( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) ( 2 4 + 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) ⋯ ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 )
The above product can be expressed as 2 n − 1 . What is n ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It shouldnt be level 3 .Btw Same way!(+1)
exactly what i did nice one!!
Great solution!!!!!!!!
NICE SOLUTIONS..................
Relevant wiki: Properties of difference of two squares
Notice that 2 + 1 = 3 = 4 − 1 = 2 2 − 1
Substitute this in:
( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) ( 2 4 + 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) … ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 ) = ( 2 2 − 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) ( 2 4 + 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) … ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 ) = ( 2 4 − 1 ) ( 2 4 + 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) … ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 ) = ( 2 8 − 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) … ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 ) = ( 2 1 6 − 1 ) … ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 ) = ( 2 1 0 2 4 ) 2 − 1 = 2 2 0 4 8 − 1
Therefore, n = 2 0 4 8
Nice solution and better than mehul arora
Nice logic through the simple case of 2+1 = 2^2 -1, we can now understand that n + k = n^2 - k. Thank you for this generous piece of knowledge!
Log in to reply
Unfortunately, we cannot generalize the pattern n + k = n 2 − k for all positive integers k
Notice that 3 + 2 = 5 , while 3 2 − 2 = 7 = 5
However, you're on to something. There is a pattern which we can actually derive from this. Can you find it?
Log in to reply
I do not find any other instance of this generalization. What pattern do you refer to?
Log in to reply
@Refath Bari – Hint: I'll give you the first 3-4 sequences
2 + 1 = 2 2 − 1 3 + 3 = 3 2 − 3 4 + 6 = 4 2 − 6 5 + 1 0 = 5 2 − 1 0
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – I got it! Yes, allow me to send a picture of my solution. In fact, I will produce a note and send the link.
@Hung Woei Neoh – Alright I've got the generalized formula, which is : n + (n^2-n/2) = n^2 - (n^2-n/2)
Log in to reply
@Refath Bari – Am I right? I searched my formula on google, but all that comes up appears to be variations of this question. Furthermore, I seem to have wasted my math on something useless! All I've done is showed n*n=n^2. Are there any holes in my logic?
@Refath Bari – Yep, you got it. Though I must say, this is a pretty pointless pattern
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – Exactly,...I've dug a 3ft hole for no reason.
@Hung Woei Neoh – Oh well, Off to find another mathetical adventure. Hopefully a fullfilling one.
Actually, there seems to be merely 1 instance of this generalization, and that is with the integers 1 & 2!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Properties of difference of two squares
Observe that multiplying by ( 2 − 1 ) will make no difference to the complete product, but observe:
( 2 − 1 ) ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) = ( 2 2 − 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) = ( 2 4 − 1 )
This triggers a chain reaction.
Continuing in the same way, we reach:
( 2 1 0 2 4 − 1 ) ( 2 1 0 2 4 + 1 ) = 2 2 0 4 8 − 1
n = 2 0 4 8
Identity used: ( a + b ) ( a − b ) = a 2 − b 2