Find the value of k such that x 5 + k x + 4 has exactly one positive root of multiplicity 2.
Clarification: Having one positive root of multiplicity 2 means that there is exactly one positive root for the equation, and the root is repeated as a factor of the polynomial twice.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
At a multiple root the derivative is zero. Thus 5 x 4 + k = 0 ∴ 5 x 5 + k x = 0 , and subtracting this from the original equation − 4 x 5 + 4 = 0 ∴ x 5 = 1 ∴ x = 1 ; substitute in derivative gives 5 + k = 0 ∴ k = − 5 .
I did not use the condition x > 0 . Am I overlooking something?
I'm not a master of calculus, but...
The equations you just written require solutions for x such that it crosses AND is tangent to the x-axis at some point for some k. Since the graph rises to the right and is above the x-axis when x = 0 , then the graph must have its local maxima to the left of the x-axis for all k, so the only point which can satisfy must have a positive x-coordinate.
Take it with a grain of salt. I have actually never studied anything beyond differentiation in calculus...
Also, did you know this was an algebra problem? XD
Log in to reply
No doubt you are right... Thing is, I did not need the assumption that x > 0 .
And yes, if a polynomial has a multiple zero, this corresponds to a point tangent to the x -axis.
Log in to reply
Nope XD
What about roots of multiplicity 3? (Gonna screw you over XDD)
Log in to reply
@Manuel Kahayon – In that case the graph is still tangent to the x-axis... we use that language even if it crosses it (unless the multiplicity is actually 4 :) )
Log in to reply
@Arjen Vreugdenhil – Huh? Now I'm the one who got screwed over...
Won't it still be tangent at multiplicity 4...?
Log in to reply
@Manuel Kahayon – Yes, it would; but it would not "cross" to the other side, as in the case of multiplicity 3.
Since the polynomial only crosses the x-axis once and is tangent to the x-axis, we conclude that x 5 + k x + 4 ≥ 0 for all positive x, which simplifies to x 5 + 4 ≥ − k x .
By AM-GM Inequality,
5 x 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 ≥ 5 x 5 = x
So, x 5 + 4 ≥ 5 x for all positive x .
So, we get − k = 5 , k = − 5
If f(x) > -5x, then f(x) is certainly greater than -6x -7x -8x .......
Assume polynomial to be ( x − a ) 2 × ( x 3 + b x 2 + c x + d ) . Make coefficients of x 3 , x 2 , x 4 = 0 and constant =4 to get a=1,b=2,c=3,d=4. Substitute these values in coefficient of x to get it -5, which is k also!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We want f ( a ) = f ′ ( a ) = 0 or a 5 + k a + 4 = 5 a 4 + k = 0 or a 5 − 5 a 5 + 4 = 0 , so a = 1 and k = − 5