If x 4 + a x 3 + 3 x 2 + b x + 1 ≥ 0 for all real x where a , b ∈ R . Find the maximum value of ( a 2 + b 2 ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
That's very nice!
Why can every quartic polynomial be factored?
Log in to reply
I am going to prove here for you that any quartic polynomial of real coefficients can be factored into the product of two quadratic polynomials of real coefficients. To make this more concrete we are going to consider the case when the polynomial has leading coefficient 1. As a consequence of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra any polynomial f ( x ) with leading coefficient 1 and degree 4 can be factored into linear factors as follows f ( x ) = ( x − z 1 ) ( x − z 2 ) ( x − z 3 ) ( x − z 4 ) where the numbers z i are complex numbers. In the other hand, the complex conjugate theorem says that for any polynomial of real coefficients if z is a complex zero then its complex conjugate is also a zero. Therefore there are three possible cases here:
Case 1: when all the z i are real zeros. Case 2 : when only two zeros are real, let's say z 1 and z 2 and the other two are complex conjugate numbers, let's say z 3 and z 4 . Case 3: when the polynomial has two pairs of complex conjugate zeros, let's say the first pair is formed by z 1 and z 2 and the second pair by z 3 and z 4 .
Since the expanded expression of ( x − α ) ( x − β ) is a second degree polynomial with real coefficients whenever α and β are both real or both complex conjugate, then the desired factorization in any of the three cases is ( x 2 − ( z 1 + z 2 ) x + z 1 z 2 ) ( x 2 − ( z 3 + z 4 ) x + z 3 z 4 ) .
Since x 4 + a x 3 + 3 x 2 + b x + 1 is always greater than or equal to 0
⇒ x 4 + a x 3 + 3 x 2 + b x + 1 = ( x + r ) 4 or ( x + p ) 2 ( x + q ) 2
Now if desired answer is ( x + r ) 4 then r = 1 but expanding ( x + 1 ) 4 we get
x 4 + 4 x 3 + 6 x 2 + 4 x + 1 which cannot be our solution {as coefficient of x 2
are different}
Therefore the only possibility left is ( x + p ) 2 ( x + q ) 2
After expanding and rearranging the coefficients we get
x 4 + 2 ( p + q ) x 3 + ( p 2 + q 2 + 4 p q ) x 2 + 2 p q ( p + q ) x + p 2 q 2
Comparing this equation with given equation we can easily see that,
2 ( p + q ) = a ............ 1
p 2 + q 2 + 4 p q = 3 ............ 2
2 p q ( p + q ) = b ............ 3
and p 2 q 2 = 1 ............ 4
Now required value is maximum of all values of a 2 + b 2 = 4 ( p + q ) 2 + 4 p 2 q 2 ( p + q ) 2
⇒ a n s = m a x { 4 ( p 2 + q 2 + 2 p q ) ( 1 + p 2 q 2 ) }
Since p 2 q 2 = 1 therefore a n s w e r is m a x { 8 ( p 2 + q 2 + 2 p q ) }
Since p 2 q 2 = 1
⇒ p q = 1 or − 1 using this in 2 n d equation we get p 2 + q 2 + 2 p q = 1 or 5
⇒ a n s = m a x { 8 , 4 0 }
⇒ a n s = 4 0 .
The first line need not be true. For example, x 4 + 1 is always greater than or equal to 0, but it cannot be written in either format.
Log in to reply
x 4 + 1 = 0 ∀ x ∈ R
Log in to reply
It is not required, nor stated, that the function must be equal to 0 at some point in time.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – True, but if you add a larger x^3 or x, one side of the function will decrease in value. The larger the co-efficient, the larger the discrepancy. So that means there is a largest value which will make the function touch the x-axis, and he is assuming that this point of contact is a tangent. If it is a tangent, then it must be at least a double root. Hence, he assumes that it is a perfect square. I don't know if this is his line of reasoning, but this is the best I can reconstruct...
Log in to reply
@Jack Lam – Right, that is the path that Ariel took in his solution.
I do not profess to be a mind reader, and can only comment on the solution that I see.
Sorry but I couldn't find a way to solve it geometrically; I used algebra.
Let f ( x ) = x 4 + a x 3 + 3 x 2 + b x + 1 .
Lemma 1: If a 2 + b 2 is at its maximum value, then f ( x ) must have a double root.
Proof: Suppose not. Then either it has no real roots or a non-double root. Suppose first that it has no roots. Assume b ≤ 0 (the case for b > 0 is similar). Now let s be the minimum value of x f ( x ) for x > 0 . Then s > 0 and f ( x ) ≥ s x for x > 0 . Incidentally, for x ≤ 0 we have f ( x ) ≥ 0 ≥ s x , so therefore we have f ( x ) − s x ≥ 0 for all x . Therefore we have a new function g ( x ) = x 4 + a x 3 + 3 x 2 + ( b − s ) x + 1 ≥ 0 , and since b ≤ 0 we have a 2 + ( b − s ) 2 > a 2 + b 2 . This is a contradiction, because a 2 + b 2 was supposed to be a maximum.
Therefore f ( x ) must have a real root. Since f ( x ) ≥ 0 , then this root must be a double root
Let m be a double root of f ( x ) . Then, f ( x ) = ( x − m ) 2 ( x 2 + p x + q ) f ( x ) = x 4 + ( p − 2 m ) x 3 + ( m 2 − 2 m p + q ) x 2 + ( m 2 p − 2 m q ) x + m 2 q Matching the last coefficient gives q = m 2 1 . Hence, matching the coefficient of x 2 gives m 2 − 2 m p + m 2 1 = 3 . Therefore, p = 2 m 3 m 4 − 3 m 2 + 1 . ( A )
Now since f ( x ) ≥ 0 and ( x − m ) 2 ≥ 0 , then x 2 + p x + q must also be nonnegative. Hence its discriminant is nonpositive. Thus, p 2 − 4 q ≤ 0 p 2 ≤ m 2 4 ∣ p ∣ ≤ ∣ m ∣ 2 ∣ m p ∣ ≤ 2 . . . . ( B ) Hence, by equations ( A ) and ( B ) , we have m 4 − 3 m 2 + 1 = 2 m 3 p ∣ m 4 − 3 m 2 + 1 ∣ = 2 m 2 ∣ m p ∣ ≤ 4 m 2 m 4 − 3 m 2 + 1 ≤ ∣ m 4 − 3 m 2 + 1 ∣ ≤ 4 m 2 m 4 + 1 ≤ 7 m 2 . . . . ( C ) Now we have a = p − 2 m and b = m 2 p − m 2 . Therefore, by formulas ( A ) , ( B ) and ( C ) we get the following: a 2 + b 2 = ( p − 2 m ) 2 + ( m 2 p − m 2 ) 2 = ( 1 + m 4 ) p 2 + 4 ( m 2 − 2 m p + m 2 1 ) ≤ 7 m 2 p 2 + 4 ∗ 3 ≤ 7 ∗ 2 2 + 1 2 = 4 0 Thus a 2 + b 2 ≤ 4 0 . Note that this value is achieved when a = 2 5 and b = − 2 5 .
This is a result of full numerical analysis simplified with critical facts described as follows:
a and b ought to be of different signs for maximum possible a 2 + b 2 . Moreover, their magnitudes ought to be equal. Therefore, we can assign (a = p and b = - p) OR (a = - p and b = p). Found that p = 2 5 . The idea is either a or b helps x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 , while one of the remained to compete against it, so that a 2 + b 2 can be maximum.
Maximum a 2 + b 2 = 40
y = x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 and y = a x 3 + b x as shown above shall be encountering situations with certain a and b in their geometry. If not because of turning portions to intercept, then the maximum should be infinity. But we want the whole expression to be always NOT smaller than zero. Note that signs between a and b are totally I n t e r c h a n g a b l e !
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First we are going to prove that a 2 + b 2 is less than or equal to 40, and second we are going to prove that there is such a polynomial for which the equality can be reached.
Part 1 ( Proof that a 2 + b 2 ≤ 4 0 ): Any 4th degree polynomial satisfying the given condition can be represented in the form of the product of two quadratic polynomials that have discriminants less than or equal to zero, with leading coefficients equal to one, and positive constant terms whose product is one. Then x 4 + a x 3 + 3 x 2 + b x + 1 = ( x 2 + p x + r 2 ) ( x 2 + q x + 1 / r 2 ) where
p 2 ≤ 4 r 2 , q 2 ≤ r 2 4 ( 1 )
From the equality by expanding the product and making the coefficients of the same powers of x equal, we also obtain the following equations p + q = a , ( 2 ) r 2 + r 2 1 + p q = 3 ( 3 ) r 2 p + q r 2 = b ( 4 )
Multiplying the inequalities in (1) and taking square root of both sides we obtain that ∣ p q ∣ ≤ 4 . Using this inequality and the equality (3) we get r 2 + r 2 1 ≤ 7 . Then using the latter inequality and (1), (2), (3) and (4) we obtain the following sequence of inequalities a 2 + b 2 = ( p + q ) 2 + ( r 2 p + q r 2 ) 2 = = p 2 + q 2 + 2 p q + r 4 p 2 + q 2 r 4 + 2 p q ≤ ≤ 4 r 2 + r 2 4 + 4 p q + 4 r 2 + r 2 4 ≤ ≤ 4 ( r 2 + r 2 1 + p q + r 2 + r 2 1 ) ≤ ≤ 4 ( 3 + 7 ) = 4 0 Part 2 . (Proof that there is a particular polynomial for which a 2 + b 2 = 4 0 ) Let us consider r as one the solutions of the equation r 2 + r 2 1 = 7 . Then it can be verified by direct calculation that the polynomial ( x 2 − 2 r x + r 2 ) ( x 2 + r 2 x + r 2 1 ) satisfies all the conditions stated. Besides that, by expanding the polynomial and getting the expressions of a and b , we have that a 2 + b 2 = 4 ( r − 1 / r ) 2 + 4 ( 1 / r − r ) 2 = 8 ( r 2 + r 2 1 − 2 ) = = 8 ( 7 − 2 ) = 8 ∗ 5 = 4 0 .