R = x = 1 ∑ ∞ x 8 − 3 x 6 + 2 7 x 2 − 8 1 x 5 − 9 x
If R can be written in the form q p , where p and q are coprime positive integers , find ∣ p − q ∣ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yep, cool question(reshared and liked), cooolest solution!!(upvoted)
Log in to reply
Oh.. Thank you very much... Keep solving and posting... :-)
Nice! problem and solution! :)
Could you explain how you calculated that the sum of the telescopic series u got at the very end is 1+1+1/3?
Log in to reply
Write some of the starting terms and you will see how the series telescopes... ( 1 − 7 1 ) + ( 1 − 1 3 1 ) + ( 3 1 − 2 1 1 ) + ( 7 1 + 3 1 1 ) + ( 1 3 1 − 4 3 1 ) ⋯
See above the pattern how the terms cancel.All except first and last three terms cancel. Last three terms approach zero as x → ∞ so only first three terms remain and that's what I've written.. :-)
Log in to reply
@Rishabh Cool
There is no need to calculate the terms, you can show telescopy without calculating the terms.
Notice that, x 2 + 3 x + 3 = ( x + 3 ) 2 − 3 ( x + 3 ) + 3 .
Now, 6 1 [ n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( x 2 − 3 x + 3 1 − x 2 + 3 x + 3 1 ) ] = 6 1 [ n = 1 ∑ ∞ x 2 − 3 x + 3 1 − n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( x + 3 ) 2 − 3 ( x + 3 ) + 3 1 ] = 6 1 [ n = 1 ∑ ∞ x 2 − 3 x + 3 1 − n = 4 ∑ ∞ x 2 − 3 x + 3 1 ] = 6 1 [ 1 + 1 + 3 1 ] = 1 8 7 .
Log in to reply
@Aditya Sky – Nice I tried it this way but could not get it. Thanks for teaching me. up voted.
Thanks a lot :)
Nice, well done.
Plzz tell how we came to the second step of factorising the denominator
Log in to reply
(Basically its the Sophie Germain identity)
x 4 − 3 x 2 + 9 = ( x 4 + 6 x 2 + 9 ) − 9 x 2 = ( x 2 + 3 ) 2 − ( 3 x ) 2 = ( x 2 + 3 − 3 x ) ( x 2 + 3 + 3 x )
I also got the solution as 1/6 (2+(1/3)).But then i simplify it as 1/6 8/3=4/9=p/q. so absolute value of p-q =5.A silly mistake!...
Log in to reply
No problem.... You can always learn from them... :-)
You are kidding with me, the sum is 0.4924111
Log in to reply
No.... The answer is indeed correct
Log in to reply
sorry, there was a mistake in my Pascal sequence
sorry, it was a mistake in my Pascal sequence
For those yet unfamiliar with telescopic series, here is a more laborious solution:
Simplify the fraction to get: x 2 ( x 2 − 3 ) + 9 x .
Then do the summation manually until x = 2 0 , or using your calculator until x = 5 0 0 or so.
It will be clear that the series converges to 0 . 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 . . . .
Now all we need to do is to convert that into a rational fraction.
Let x = 0 . 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 . . . .
Then 1 0 x = 3 . 8 8 8 8 8 8 . . . and 1 0 0 x = 3 8 . 8 8 8 8 8 . . . .
Subtract the last two to get 9 0 x = 3 5 , or x = 1 8 7
So, the answer is the absolute value of 7 − 1 8 , i.e. 1 1 .
This is not a good solution. No finite number of terms will allow you to know with certainty that it converges to 7/18. You can, with only minor modifications, come up with series which will sum to 0.388888888889.
I know. I never said it was a good solution. But it sure helps in making a guess!
I solved it the Rishabh Cool way with long way for telescopic series.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Numerator : x ( x 4 − 9 )
Also, x 6 + 2 7 = ( x 2 + 3 ) ( x 4 − 3 x 2 + 9 ) = ( x 2 + 3 ) ( x 2 + 3 x + 3 ) ( x 2 − 3 x + 3 )
Hence Denominator : ( x 4 − 9 ) ( x 2 − 3 x + 3 ) ( x 2 + 3 x + 3 )
R = x = 1 ∑ ∞ [ ( x 2 − 3 x + 3 ) ( x 2 + 3 x + 3 ) x ]
= 6 1 x = 1 ∑ ∞ [ ( x 2 − 3 x + 3 ) 1 − ( x 2 + 3 x + 3 ) 1 ]
( A T e l e s c o p i c S e r i e s )
= 6 1 [ 1 + 1 + 3 1 ] = 1 8 7
∴ 1 8 − 7 = 1 1