It is well known that one can create a bijection between the natural numbers and the rational numbers by snaking diagonally through the entries of a grid, as can be seen in the picture.
We can define a sequence { a i } i = 1 ∞ in that manner, ie
a 1 = 1 1 a 4 = 3 1 a 7 = 1 4 a 2 = 1 2 a 5 = 2 2 a 8 = 2 3 a 3 = 2 1 a 6 = 1 3 …
Find the value of
n → ∞ lim n ln n μ ( a i , n ( n + 1 ) / 2 )
where μ ( x i , n ) denotes the mean of the first n elements of { x i } .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Mannn.... I thought the mean was the average of the terms....
I agree that n → ∞ lim n 2 ln n S n = 2 1 . But then S n = 2 n ( n + 1 ) μ ( a i , 2 n ( n + 1 ) ) . Substituting, I get n → ∞ lim ln n μ ( a i , 2 n ( n + 1 ) ) = 1 .
Log in to reply
@Ang Yan Sheng Thoughts?
I do not agree with
Let S n be the sum of the first 2 n ( n + 1 ) terms; we wish to find lim n → ∞ n 2 ln n S n .
Log in to reply
Indeed, I seem to have thought that μ ( a i , 2 n ( n + 1 ) ) = n S n ...
Log in to reply
@Ang Yan Sheng – Thanks. I have updated the answer to 1.
Can you update the solution accordingly?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since the question keeps changing, let us prove once and for all that n → ∞ lim n ln n μ ( a i , 2 n ( n + 1 ) ) = 2 1 .
Let S n be the sum of the first 2 n ( n + 1 ) terms; we wish to find lim n → ∞ n 2 ln n S n . Firstly, S n = 1 1 + 2 1 + ⋯ + n − 1 1 + n 1 + 1 2 + 2 2 + ⋯ + n − 1 2 + ⋯ + 1 n = H n + 2 H n − 1 + ⋯ + ( n − 1 ) H 2 + n H 1 , where H k = 1 + 2 1 + ⋯ + k 1 .
Define ϵ k = H k − ln k . Then S n = T n + ϵ n + 2 ϵ n − 1 + ⋯ + n ϵ 1 , where T n = ln n + 2 ln ( n − 1 ) + ⋯ + ( n − 1 ) ln 2 + n ln 1 .
Recall the standard result lim k → ∞ ϵ k = γ = 0 . 5 7 7 … . Hence the sequence ∣ ϵ k ∣ is bounded by an absolute constant E , so ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ n 2 ln n ϵ n + 2 ϵ n − 1 + ⋯ + n ϵ 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ≤ n 2 ln n 2 n ( n + 1 ) E → 0 as n → ∞ . Hence we are left to find lim n → ∞ n 2 ln n T n .
Now note that T n = ( ln n n + ln n ) + 2 ( ln n n − 1 + ln n ) + ⋯ + n ( ln n 1 + ln n ) = 2 n ( n + 1 ) ln n + j = 1 ∑ n f ( n j ) + n j = 1 ∑ n g ( n j ) , where f ( x ) = ln x and g ( x ) = ( 1 − x ) ln x .
But as n → ∞ , we have n 1 j = 1 ∑ n f ( n j ) → ∫ 0 1 ln x d x = − 1 , and n 1 j = 1 ∑ n g ( n j ) → ∫ 0 1 ( 1 − x ) ln x d x = − 4 3 .
Hence n → ∞ lim n 2 ln n T n = n → ∞ lim ( n 2 ln n 2 n ( n + 1 ) ln n + n ln n n 1 ∑ j = 1 n f ( n j ) + ln n n 1 ∑ j = 1 n g ( n j ) ) = n → ∞ lim ( n 2 ln n 2 n ( n + 1 ) ln n − n ln n 1 − ln n 4 3 ) = 2 1 − 0 − 0 = 2 1 , as desired.