⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + ⋯ + x n x 1 4 + x 2 4 + x 3 4 + ⋯ + x n 4 = 2 0 1 6 = 2 0 1 6 × 5 1 2
Let x 1 , x 2 , … , x n be real numbers .
Find the smallest possible value of n such that there exists real solutions to the equations above.
For more problems like this, try answering this set .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Ya, i did it with Titu's Lemma!
Log in to reply
can you kindly show how you apply Titu's Lemma in this problem? :)
Log in to reply
Ya, Actually the modified form of Titu's Lemma, let me show you the modified form
For any positive integer m , we have a 1 m − 1 x 1 m + a 2 m − 1 x 2 m + ⋯ + a n m − 1 x n m ≥ ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a n ) m − 1 ( x 1 + x 2 + ⋯ + x n ) m .
Log in to reply
@Md Zuhair – This is wrong. A condition for Titu's lemma to work is to have x 1 , x 2 , … , x n to be strictly positive. But this problem didn't specify that they are all positive numbers.
So you have only shown that the answer is 252 if you made the assumption that x 1 , x 2 , … , x n are positive.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Yes, Its correct, So how have you done it?
@Pi Han Goh – So what if some of them are negative? Can you help?
Log in to reply
@Steven Jim – See the solution posted by the author.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – I read it. What I mean is that can we use Titu's lemma here?
Log in to reply
@Steven Jim – No, we can't.
Use power mean inequality and you will get your answer in one step.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
Let's generalize this.
Let x and y denote the values
x y = = x 1 + x 2 + ⋯ + x n x 1 4 + x 2 4 + ⋯ + x n 4
By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (CS), for all sequences of real numbers a i and b i , we have ( i = 1 ∑ n a i 2 ) ( i = 1 ∑ n b i 2 ) ≥ ( i = 1 ∑ n a i b i ) 2 .
Now suppose a i = x i for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , n and b 1 = b 2 = ⋯ = b n = 1 , then we have
(x_1^2 + x_2 ^2 + \cdots + x_n ^2 ) \left( \underbrace{1 + 1 + 1 + \cdots + 1}_{n \text{ number of 1's}} \right) \geq (x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n)^2 .
Or equivalently, \color{#3D99F6}{x_1^2 + x_2 ^2 + \cdots + x_n ^2 \geq \dfrac{x^2}n} .
Now suppose we apply CS again, but this time, suppose a i = x i 2 for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , … , n and b 1 = b 2 = ⋯ = b n = 1 , then we have
(x_1^4 + x_2 ^4 + \cdots + x_n ^4 ) \left( \underbrace{1 + 1 + 1 + \cdots + 1}_{n \text{ number of 1's}} \right) \geq (x_1^2 + x_2 ^2+ \cdots + x_n^2 )^2 .
Or equivalently, y ≥ n ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + ⋯ + x n 2 ) 2 .
Combining these 2 inequalities (highlighted in blue) gives
y ≥ n 3 x 4 .
In this case, x = 2 0 1 6 , y = 2 0 1 6 × 5 1 2 . Upon simplifying, we get n ≥ 2 5 2 , with x 1 = x 2 = ⋯ = x 2 5 2 = 2 5 2 2 0 1 6 = 8 .