Chain on a hillock

Consider two hillocks adjacent to each other with smooth surfaces,

They may have any shape, A silver chain lying midway between them initially has "half" of its length on one hillock and half on the other hillock ,, and rises to an equal height 'H" initially on either of them, ( Refer to figure)

The earth as usual has gravitational field.

And the slope of the part where the chains end terminate have slope 90 degree.

You may refer to the figure now

Now if i slightly displace the chain towards the centre and release, find the time period of oscillations.

( in seconds)

DETAILS

\bullet Mass= 1

\bullet height =1

\bullet l= 1

\bullet g =10

NOTE

\bullet Assume all ideal Conditions.

HINT

\bullet internal tension of chain cancels out

\bullet It is a free chain.


The answer is 1.40496.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Mvs Saketh
Oct 18, 2014

consider any small element of mass 'dm' of length 'dx'

Let the linear mass density of the chain be ' λ \lambda '

Then the forces acting on this small component is dT ( change in tension from right of this component to left) and

dm(g sin (x)) along the hillock

or we have d m g s i n θ d T = d m a dm\quad g\quad sin\theta \quad -\quad dT\quad =\quad dm\quad a\quad \\ \\

Now being an inextensible string, also due to lack of friction there is no chance of slacking,

so acceleration of all components have same magnitude but different directions.

Now

being a free chain, its tension at the ends are 0 , (qualititavely it can also be explained as arising from the fact that net tension should cancel out as an internal force so d T \int { dT } should be 0 when over whole chain it is integrated)

also

g s i n θ d m = g s i n θ λ d l = g λ ( d l s i n θ ) = g λ d y gsin\theta \quad dm\quad =\quad gsin\theta \quad \lambda \quad dl\quad =\quad g\lambda \quad (dl\quad sin\theta )\\ \\ =g\lambda dy

thus we have

d m g s i n θ d T = d m a dm\quad g\quad sin\theta \quad -\quad dT\quad =\quad dm\quad a\quad \\ \\

= g λ d y d T = a d m g\lambda dy-dT=adm

Now when i slightly displace the chain,, the lengths of chain on either hill change by l+dl and l-dl, and height to h+dh and h-dh,

Then integrating expression for part 1 under limits

we get

g λ d y d T = a d m g λ ( h 2 h 1 ) = m a ( d o w n w a r d a l o n g t h e h i l l ) f o r h 1 = h + d h a n d h 2 = h d h w e h a v e 2 g λ d h = m a o r g λ 2 m d h = a = 2 g λ m s i n Φ d l = 2 g l d l = l ¨ ( r e p r e s e n t s a c c e l e r a t i o n a l o n g l e n g t h ) g\lambda dy-dT=adm\\ \\ g\lambda (h2-h1)=ma(downward\quad along\quad the\quad hill)\quad for\quad h1=h+dh\quad and\quad h2=h-dh\\ \\ we\quad have\quad -2g\lambda dh=ma\quad or\quad \\ -\frac { g\lambda 2 }{ m } dh=a=-2\frac { g\lambda }{ m } sin\Phi \quad dl=\quad -2\frac { g }{ l } dl=\ddot { l } (represents\quad acceleration\quad along\quad length)\\ \\

s o 2 π l 2 g = 1.40496 so\quad 2\pi \sqrt { \frac { l }{ 2g } } =\quad 1.40496

Now isnt that a beautiful result , it is equivalent to a pendulum with half its length, please correct me if I am wrong

note i have mentioned sin(phi) = 1 in the question do check if doubtful

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 7 months ago

To check, do you want me to remove the image? If so, please let me know by replying to this comment.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Can i replace the image instead with another one? because the image does not properly reflect the conditions of the questions.

sorry for delayed response

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

If you email me the image, I can update it. Please mention the title of this problem, and preferably include the URL. Thanks!

Calvin @ Brilliant.org

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin I have emailed it , please update

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mvs Saketh Thanks for the image!

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 7 months ago

Nice problem !:) But sir, you would agree that if H=1 then l must be greater than 2. I get confused while i was calculating the result.

Вук Радовић - 6 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...