This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
typo in third line as it should be 1 l n ( 0 ) not 1 l n ( 1 )
Please, please, please, be very wary of doing such substitutions.
You have to justify why lim f ( x ) g ( x ) = lim f ( x ) lim g ( x ) .
Log in to reply
Thanks. I have changed the solution.
Log in to reply
We're still in an indeterminate case with lim x x ln x \since lim x x = 1 , lim ln x = − ∞ .
Take x^x as t.So now the problem stands out to be x^t-t....well t tends to 1 and x tends to 0 so the answer...😊😊
L = x → 0 lim x x ln ( L ) = x → 0 lim x ln ( x ) = (Using L’Hopital’s Rule) x → 0 lim − x 2 1 x 1 = 0
L = e 0 = 1
lim x → 0 x 1 − 1 = − 1
You can't directly write lim(x>0) xln(x)=0 as it's an indeterminate form.Should have cleared that.
why have you considered lim x → 0 x 1 . why can't we consider lim x → 0 1 x in the last step
Log in to reply
Since the original function is x ( x x ) then do the limit to the exponent first. x x x / = ( x x ) x so we can't consider 1 x . Also doing that would not result in -1.
Log in to reply
Can you prove why you considered limit to the exponent first. What is wrong in my consideration because while solving to u Don't that the answer is − 1 .
Log in to reply
@Shivam Jadhav – This goes to my point that we have to be aware of the conditions under which lim f g = lim f lim g .
We cannot just blindly substitute one for the other, especially when we're in an indeterminate form.
Please, please, please, be very wary of doing such substitutions.
You have to justify why lim f ( x ) g ( x ) = lim f ( x ) lim g ( x ) .
I was excited that you did the justification for x x , but saddened that you subsequently ignored it.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: L'Hopital's Rule - Basic
L = x → 0 + lim ( x x x − x x ) = x → 0 + lim exp ( ln x x x ) − x → 0 + lim exp ( ln x x ) = exp ( x → 0 + lim x x ln x ) − exp ( x → 0 + lim x ln x ) = e ln 0 − e 0 = 0 − 1 = − 1 Note that x → 0 lim x ln x = 0 ⟹ x → 0 lim x x = 1 (see note)
Note:
x → 0 lim x ln x = x → 0 lim x 1 ln x = x → 0 lim − x 2 1 x 1 = x → 0 lim − x 1 × x 2 = 0 A ∞ / ∞ case, L’H o ˆ pital’s rule applies. Differentiate up and down w.r.t x