Coincidental relation?

Algebra Level 2

Given that 1 + 2 + 3 + + n = 666 1 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n = 666 , what is the value of 1 3 + 2 3 + 3 3 + + n 3 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \cdots + n^3 ?

66 6 2 666^2 66 6 3 666^3 66 6 5 666^5 66 6 4 666^4

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Wen Z
Dec 20, 2016

Well the sum of the first n numbers is n ( n + 1 ) 2 \frac{n(n+1)}{2} and the sum of the first n cubes is n 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 4 \frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4} which can be found here . So obviously squaring the first results in the second.

Brock Brown
Dec 15, 2016

Obligatory Python answer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
total = 0
n = 1
while total != 666:
    total += n
    n += 1
total = 0
for i in range(1,n):
    total += i**3
i = 1
while 666**i != total:
    i += 1
print ("Answer: 666 ^", i)

The perfect answer.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 6 months ago
Tina Sobo
Nov 27, 2016

It doesn't prove why 666^2 is the answer; but if you cube both sides of the original equation, it is easy to see that the cube of the RHS is greater than 1^3 + 2^3.... n^3. Therefore the answer has to be smaller than 666^3 (the cube of the LHS). Only one option is smaller.

Sum of 1+2+3+... = n(n+1)/2 And the sum of 1^3 + 2^3+3^3+... = (n(n+1)/2)^2. So 666^2 is the anwer

But are you sure that there exists a positive integer n n satisfying the given equation?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Jup n=36. Didn't think it was worth telling ;)

Peter van der Linden - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

well, if I were to replace all the 666's with 111, then one could easily guess that the answer is 111^2 =D

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh True true... but since it all worked for this quest ion I have chosen to leave it out of my solution. But you are right that it has to be checked to see if it holds

Peter van der Linden - 4 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...