Colouring Space

You have a 3D pen which has three colours Red , Blue , Green \color{#D61F06}{\text{Red}} , \color{#3D99F6}{\text{Blue}} , \color{#20A900}{\text{Green}} . I give you a 2 m × 2 m × 2 m 2\text{m}\times2\text{m}\times2\text{m} cube and ask you to completely fill it with the colours in such a way that no two points in the cube which are 1 m 1\text{m} apart have the same colour. Is this possible? If it is possible, how many ways can this be done?

Yes, it is possible in only 6 6 ways Yes, it is possible in 48 48 ways Yes, it is possible in 6 ! × 8 6! \times 8 ways Yes, it is possible in 48 ! 48! ways No, it is not possible

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Chris Lewis
Feb 26, 2021

This actually isn't even possible in the plane, never mind a cube.

The three vertices of any 1 1 m equilateral triangle have to be different colours. Draw such a triangle, then add a new equilateral triangle on one of its sides:

The blank circle on the right can only be coloured red (it's one metre from a green point, and one metre from a blue one). Note the order of the colouring is arbitrary.

We conclude that any two points separated by a distance of 3 \sqrt3 m must have the same colour .

But now consider an isosceles triangle with sides 3 \sqrt3 , 3 \sqrt3 , 1 1 metres:

Points A A and C C must be the same colour (separated by 3 \sqrt3 m); points B B and C C must be the same colour; but points A A and B B (separated by 1 1 m) can't be. Contradiction!

So the colouring is impossible.

Nice solution, I wanted the problem to be easily solvable by considering a tetrahedron

Jason Gomez - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

I’ll try to make a harder version of the same type soon

Jason Gomez - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Actually, that's a much better solution for this particular problem! The 2d version is just a particular favourite of mine.

Chris Lewis - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Chris Lewis Involving a tetrahedron ?

Jason Gomez - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jason Gomez Yes - it's almost a proof without words with a tetrahedron

Chris Lewis - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

@Chris Lewis And do the staff decide on what topic the question is based on, I remember putting logic as the topic of this problem

Jason Gomez - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jason Gomez Yeah, good point, I remember this being logic originally too. It's certainly not probability. I think some users also have access to change topics.

Chris Lewis - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Chris Lewis Moderators like Chew Seong Cheong do I think but it would make no sense for this to be under probability, is it fine if I change it back to logic or maybe geometry

Jason Gomez - 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Jason Gomez What are you guys saying?

Ash Ketchup - 2 months, 2 weeks ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...