Find the value of k that makes the equation
∣ ( p 4 + k p 2 q 2 + q 4 ) + ( 4 p 3 q − 4 p q 3 ) i ∣ = p 2 + q 2
true for all real values of p and q .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let p 4 + k p 2 q 2 + q 4 + 4 p q ( p 2 − q 2 ) = α + β i . Then we have:
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ α + β i = ( α + β i ) 2 = α 2 − β 2 + 2 α β i ∣ α + β i ∣ = p 2 + q 2 ⟹ α 2 + β 2 = p 2 + q 2 ⟹ { α 2 − β 2 = p 4 + k p 2 q 2 + q 4 α β = 2 p q ( p 2 − q 2 ) . . . ( 1 ) . . . ( 2 ) ⟹ α 2 + β 2 = p 4 + 2 p 2 q 2 + q 4 . . . ( 3 )
⟹ ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ 2 ( 3 ) + ( 1 ) : 2 ( 3 ) − ( 1 ) : α 2 = p 4 + ( 2 2 + k ) p 2 q 2 + q 4 β 2 = ( 2 2 − k ) p 2 q 2 . . . ( 4 ) . . . ( 5 )
From ( 2 ) : α β = 2 p q ( p 2 − q 2 ) ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ α = p 4 + ( 2 2 + k ) p 2 q 2 + q 4 = p 2 − q 2 β = 2 2 − k p q = 2 p q ⟹ k = + 6
There are a few problems here. The biggest is that the square root function is not well-defined over the entire complex plane. Because, generally speaking, squaring is a 2-to-1 function and the easy algorithm of "take the positive root" that works over the reals cannot be extended analytically to the complex plane as a whole.
A second problem: if I let p=q=1, the imaginary terms disappear and we are left with 2 + k = 2 . And that implies k = 2 .
But if I follow your logic, we end up with ∣ − 4 ∣ = 2 . And that's the problem. Because − 4 isn't really well-defined. There are two complex numbers that square to equal -4, and they both have norm 2. But, from the standpoint of rigor, this is a bit sketchy.
I looked at the left hand side as being essentially ( p + q i ) 4 , with k = − 6 . Indeed the system accepts k = − 6 as an answer.
Did you make a typo when you said k = 6 ? Because while k = − 6 is a problematic answer in some sense, k = 6 is surely false, and doesn't even work for your formula for α .
Log in to reply
The answer should be k = − 6 . There must be a typo in this solution.
De Moivre's Theorem is a well-defined method to take square roots on a complex plane and shows that there are always two answers with the same r -value and therefore the same absolute value. For example, z = − 4 converts to z = 4 ( cos π + i sin π ) , and its 2 second roots are 4 ( cos 2 π + 2 π 0 + i sin 2 π + 2 π 0 ) = 2 ( cos 2 π + i sin 2 π ) and 4 ( cos 2 π + 2 π 1 + i sin 2 π + 2 π 1 ) = 2 ( cos 2 3 π + i sin 2 3 π ) , which converts back to 2 i and − 2 i , both of which have an absolute value of 0 2 + ( ± 2 ) 2 = 2 .
Letting p = q = 1 in the problem leads to ∣ 2 + k ∣ = 2 (note the absolute value), which could mean k = 2 or k = − 6 . Some more examples of p and q would be needed to narrow down the answer, since the question says the equation is true for all real values of p and q .
Log in to reply
Again, the square root function is not well-defined on the complex plane. If somebody wants to define a "square root of the modulus" function, they are free to do so. That is something that is well-defined. But that's not what this problem is doing.
As you point out, there are always two solutions to z 2 = k for any complex number k = 0 . Your argument shows that − 4 is not well defined. Actual functions don't have two values. That fact is the most important thing about functions.
"Letting
p
=
q
=
1
in the problem leads to
∣
2
+
k
∣
=
2
, which means k =4, since the absolute value function used outside the square root function is redundant. The square root function is only defined on non-negative real numbers and only returns non-negative values.
You and Chew-Seong have not been empowered to redefine the square-root function away from how it is understood to function in the world's mathematical community. Being "one of two roots of a second-degree equation" is a different thing than being "the value of a square root function" because, again, square root functions are single-valued! Moreover, it is impossible to define an analytic square root function the entire complex plane. One needs to create a branch cut to create a simply connected region that excludes zero. (Deleting the negative real axis would work, but that's not the only possibility.)
Log in to reply
@Richard Desper – How about if I swap the square root and the absolute value symbols? Would that make it a better problem?
Like this:
∣ ( p 4 + k p 2 q 2 + q 4 ) + ( 4 p 3 q − 4 p q 3 ) i ∣ = p 2 + q 2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let a = p 4 + k p 2 q 2 + q 4 , b = 4 p 3 q − 4 p q 3 , and c = p 2 + q 2 . Then the equation becomes ∣ a + b i ∣ = c ,
Since ∣ a + b i ∣ = a 2 + b 2 , the equation becomes a 2 + b 2 = c , which means a 2 + b 2 = c 4 .
Substituting the original expressions back into a 2 + b 2 = c 4 gives:
( p 4 + k p 2 q 2 + q 4 ) 2 + ( 4 p 3 q − 4 p q 3 ) 2 = ( p 2 + q 2 ) 4
( p 8 + k 2 p 4 q 4 + q 8 + 2 k p 6 q 2 + 2 k p 2 q 6 + 2 p 4 q 4 ) + ( 1 6 p 6 q 2 − 3 2 p 4 q 4 + 1 6 p 2 q 6 ) = p 8 + 4 p 6 q 2 + 6 p 4 q 4 + 4 p 2 q 6 + q 8
( 2 k + 1 2 ) p 6 q 2 + ( k 2 − 3 6 ) p 4 q 4 + ( 2 k + 1 2 ) p 2 q 6 = 0
2 ( k + 6 ) p 6 q 2 + ( k − 6 ) ( k + 6 ) p 4 q 4 + 2 ( k + 6 ) p 2 q 6 = 0
2 p 2 q 2 ( k + 6 ) ( p 4 + 2 ( k − 6 ) p 2 q 2 + q 4 ) = 0
For this to be true for any value of p and q , k + 6 = 0 which means k = − 6 .