Circle Γ 1 with center O 1 is drawn. A smaller circle Γ 2 with center O 1 is drawn. Circle Γ 3 with center O 2 is drawn such that it is internally tangent to both circles Γ 1 and Γ 2 . The radius of circle Γ 1 that is perpendicular to O 1 O 2 is drawn; it intersects Γ 1 at A , Γ 2 at B , and Γ 3 at P .
Let the minimum possible value of A B A P for any choice of circles Γ 1 and Γ 2 be m . Find ⌊ 1 0 0 0 m ⌋
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Interestingly one can show that P B A P = B O 1 A O 1
You could just say "Altitude Theorem" rather than proving it...
Log in to reply
In context of circles it's essentially just power of a point.
Log in to reply
That's true. I'm just pointing out that he's reproving something. :P
Log in to reply
@Finn Hulse – I wanted a full solution. So I did everything.
Log in to reply
@Daniel Liu – Then why didn't you prove that an inscribed triangle on a semicircle is a right triangle? You just made that assertion without proof. :D
Log in to reply
@Finn Hulse – Because that is one of the most basic properties of angles. Power of a Point is not as trivial.
And besides, why do you care?
How to prove that the point O 2 is on the second circle?
Log in to reply
I never used the fact that O 2 is on the second circle because that is not true. It was just a coincidence that O 2 was on the second circle in the diagram.
Let O 1 be ( 0 , 0 ) in O x y Coordinate and let O 1 A = 1 , O 1 B = r ( r < O 1 A = 1 ) .
We then have:
That means m = m i n ( A B A P ) = m i n ( 1 − r 1 − r ) = m i n ( 1 + r 1 ) = 2 1
when r = 1
Call x=AP. A P ∗ ( 2 R − A P ) = 2 R − r ∗ R ∗ 2 = ( R − r ) ∗ R ⇒ x 2 − 2 R x + ( R − r ) ∗ R = 0 A P = − r R + R S = A B A P = R − r R − r R S = R − r R ( R − r ) S = R + r R L i m r → R S = 2 1 Because when r increases then S is decreases, but max(r)=R, at this r: S=1/2. ⌊ 1 0 0 0 S ⌋ = 5 0 0
Have you proved that the minimum happens when r → R ?
Log in to reply
S decreases when r increases, so minimum of S happens when r gets to its maximum, that is R
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Draw and label as in the above diagram.
First, notice that ∠ D P C = 9 0 ∘ because C D is the diameter of circle Γ 3 and P is on Γ 3 .
Also, we know that ∠ D O 1 A = 9 0 ∘ .
Thus, △ D O 1 P ∼ △ P O 1 C .
Therefore the ratio of their sides are the same: O 1 P D O 1 = O 1 C O 1 P
Rearranging gives ( O 1 P ) 2 = ( D O 1 ) ( O 1 C ) or O 1 P = D O 1 ⋅ O 1 C
Now, we know that D O 1 = B O 1 and A O 1 = C O 1 because they are radii of their respective circles.
Thus, O 1 P = A O 1 ⋅ B O 1
Thus, A P = A O 1 − P O 1 = A O 1 − A O 1 ⋅ B O 1
Also, A B = A O 1 − B O 1 .
Thus, we need to find the minimum of A O 1 − B O 1 A O 1 − A O 1 ⋅ B O 1
By AM-GM, we have − A O 1 ⋅ B O 1 ≥ − 2 A O 1 + B O 1 , so A O 1 − B O 1 A O 1 − A O 1 ⋅ B O 1 ≥ A O 1 − B O 1 A O 1 − 2 A O 1 + B O 1 = A O 1 − B O 1 2 A O 1 − B O 1 = 2 1
Thus, m = 2 1 , so ⌊ 1 0 0 0 m ⌋ = 5 0 0
Note: Equality case is when A O 1 = B O 1 . However, technically this can never be achieved, because when A O 1 = B O 1 then A B A P = 0 0 which is not defined. Thus, we actually have m > 2 1 . However, this does not affect the answer.