cos x = cosh x ? \cos x = \cosh x?

Geometry Level 1

Billy Tangent naively thought that the hyperbolic cosine function and the standard cosine function were the same. To make sure, he tried one real value and, sure enough, he got the same result.

What value did he try?

If you think there are multiple values for which this would work, enter 99999 as your answer.
If you think there are no values for which this would work, enter 88888 as your answer.


The answer is 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Geoff Pilling
Jan 27, 2017

cosh x = e x + e x 2 \cosh x = \dfrac{e^x + e^{-x}}{2}

This function is strictly greater that one except at the point ( 0 , 1 ) (0,1) for which it equals 1 1 .

And, 1 cos x 1 -1 \leq \cos x \leq 1

Therefore, the only point for which the two will equal is at the point ( 0 , 1 ) (0,1) .

So, x = 0 x = \boxed{0}

Interesting follow-ups: the same question instead with sin ( x ) = sinh ( x ) \sin(x) = \sinh(x) and sec ( x ) = cosh ( x ) \sec(x) = \cosh(x) . For the former the answer would still be just x = 0 x = 0 but the behavior of the two curves near the origin would have to be analyzed using calculus to verify. For the latter, if we restrict ourselves to ( π 2 , π 2 ) (-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}) then the answer would still be x = 0 x = 0 , (as sec ( x ) \sec(x) is "more concave up" on this interval), but over all reals there would be an infinite number of points of intersection.

Brian Charlesworth - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Another interesting one is csc x = csch x \csc x = \text{csch} x as its not quite so obvious just looking at the graphs where the intersections are...

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, that one is tricky. I think that there are 4 points of intersection, but they're within a whisker of each other as x 0 x \to 0 from either side.

Brian Charlesworth - 4 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Brian Charlesworth Whoa... Whisker is right!

  • ( 0.000102 , 9804 ) (-0.000102, -9804)
  • ( 0.000022 , 45455 ) (-0.000022, -45455)
  • ( 0.000022 , 45455 ) (0.000022, 45455)
  • ( 0.000102 , 9804 ) (0.000102, 9804)

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 4 months ago

I think x=0 is the only solution even for complex values.

Ishwar Karthik - 3 years, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...