x 3 − 1 3 x + a = 0
Find the sum of the squares of all integers a for which the above cubic equation has three integer roots.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
A different approach is to WLOG assume r 1 , r 2 have the same signs, then r 1 r 2 ≥ 0 . Substitude r 3 = − r 1 − r 2 into the other equation to obtain 1 3 = r 1 2 + r 2 + r 1 r 2 ≥ 3 r 1 r 2 ⟹ 4 ≥ r 1 r 2 . From this we only have to check a few cases to get a = 1 2 , − 1 2 .
Is there any mathematical for finding the actual roots.
Log in to reply
Refer to my solution., Hope u like it.
Sorry, I don't exactly understand your question. Are you asking whether or not there exists a more efficient way of solving the problem without finding the actual roots?
I found the range for a for 3 real roots of the equation, by using the fact that a cubic with 3 real roots has a positive local maxima and negative local minima, which ends up with 18.04>|a|. and some integer bounded vieta bashing to get 12 and -12. Your solution is cool too!
Clearly if we try and split 13 into two numbers such that one of them at least is a perfect square then we can ensure integer roots. Like if →x^3 - 13x +a=0 → x^3 - 9x - 4x +a=0 → x (x-3)(x+3) -4(x-a/4)=0→ Setting a=12 and a = -12 , We get 3 integer roots. On the other hand if we factorise as→ x^3 - 4x -9x + a=0 → x (x-2)(x+2) -9 (x-a/9)=0, We never get integer roots. Check for ur self!..! So sum of squares of integers' a' = (12)^2 + (-12)^2 = 144 + 144=288. Ans. Please note:- Im a beginner in maths, especially number theory, so if anyone finds some mistake plz suggest me. Thank you.
Let the roots are a1 ,a2, a3 then a1+a2+a3=0 and ,a1a2 +.....=-13 solve this equation and a1 ,a2 and a3 that is -4,3,1 and 4,-3,-2 so a=-12 or 12 Finally 288 is our answer...broooo
According to you -2×-3×4=12 Wow what calculation
Used TI-83 Plus.
− 2 1 S T O A ↓ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ↓ m e a n s E N T E R K E Y A + 1 S T O A ↓ P u t y = x 3 − 1 3 x + A = 0 i n g r a p h i n g m o d e . I n w i n d o w x : − − 1 0 t o 1 0 , y : − − 0 . 0 1 t o 0 . 0 1 . P r e s s G R A P H Does the graph intersect x-axis at all three integer x? Yes. then note down that A by pressing A and ENTER. Press ENTER ENTER GRAPH. You get the next graph with A=A+1. If there is no three integral cuts, go to next as under. Press ENTER GRAPH You will note that when |A|>18 the graph cuts the x-axis only in one point. This indicates that there are three real roots only for |A|<19. S o S T O P a t A = 1 9 .
"You will note that when |A|>18 the graph cuts the x-axis only only in one point"
How do you know this? Have you plotted the graph y = x^3-13x + a for all infinitely many integer values of a?
Log in to reply
I really can't think of your ideas as a first approach. I'll suggest you guys to solve it using Number Theory principles :D
Log in to reply
Yup. Just use Vieta's formula on the number 13.
I agree since it is a cubic and not 5th and higher.
Log in to reply
@Niranjan Khanderia – The degree of polynomial is not the issue here.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – This was with reference to using a calculator. Not your question. I have answered your question separately.
This is the WINDOW in which we have three real roots. The rest is only one real root. At A=|18|, one root has multiplicity of 2.
Log in to reply
You didn't answer my question. How do you know that there can't be 3 integer roots of x for equations like (x^3- 13x + 1000000000000 = 0)?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh
–
If you observe the behavior of the graph after A=-18 , as A goes on increasing, you will note that the x-axis starts coming between the turning points, shifting near the left turning point. At A=18, x-axis only touches the left point. There after it goes more and more away from the points. That is the behavior of the graph. We will have three roots only as long as the x-axis is between the two points. I hope I have been able to explain your point.
In y=f(x), the constant term only shifts the curve up or down by the amount the change in constant term. In an odd degree polynomial, there will be a zone between to lines parallel to the x-axis where a line parallel to x-axis will cut the curve at more that one point or touch with more than on multiplicity. It is only this zone where there are more than one roots. In our case this zone is |y|=18.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Suppose that the roots of the polynomial are r 1 , r 2 , r 3 . We then have x 3 − 1 3 x + a = ( x − r 1 ) ( x − r 2 ) ( x − r 3 ) , and by Vieta's Formulas, r 1 + r 2 + r 3 = 0 , and r 1 r 2 + r 1 r 3 + r 2 r 3 = − 1 3 .
Squaring the first formula yields r 1 2 + r 2 2 + r 3 2 + 2 r 1 r 2 + 2 r 1 r 3 + 2 r 2 r 3 = 0 , which we notice to be the sum of the squares of the roots plus twice the left side of the second formula. Subtracting that from both sides leaves r 1 2 + r 2 2 + r 3 2 = ( − 2 ) ( r 1 r 2 + r 1 r 3 + r 2 r 3 ) = 2 6 .
Thus, each root must lie between -5 and 5, inclusive, and with a little bit of guess-and-check, it becomes clear that the roots must be -4, 3, and 1 , or 4, -3, and -1 .
Since a is the product of the roots, a = 12 or -12 , and the sum of the squares of those two numbers is 2 8 8