f ( x ) = x 3 − x 2 − 2 x + 1
Let the zeros of the function above be α , β , and γ .
Find f ′ ( α ) × f ′ ( β ) × f ′ ( γ ) .
Note: f ′ ( x ) denotes the derivative of f ( x ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
i can't undersand the 'DEFINITION OF DISCRIMINANT FOR CUBIC POLYNOMIAL' .would u pls help??
Log in to reply
It is the common general definition for polynomial discriminant. When they are null, there are multiple roots.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolynomialDiscriminant.html
It is a problem of writing this symmetric function in terms of the elementary ones, which amounts to prove the discriminant formula, unless one knows it by heart...kind of messy. Anyone trying a Vandermonde approach?
Your f'(x) are missing coefficients in front of the multiples (I think), i.e. a negative gamma before (x-a)(x-b). They cancel each other out in the multiplication part because alpha beta gamma = -1.
When you solved this question did you know the fact used in the first step yet?
Your solution is just simple, beautiful and profound. Really Loved it.
Please explain in detail I can't understand from definition of discriminant
Here's a non-discriminant approach but without bashing out the solution.
We have f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 − 2 x − 2 , so we want to find r = { α , β , γ } ∏ ( 3 r 2 − 2 r − 2 )
Expanding it and comparing it by Vieta's formula will be extremely tedious. So I consider factoring the quadratic polynomial.
Consider 3 x 2 − 2 x − 2 = 3 ( x − A ) ( x − B ) , solving the identity equation for constants A , B (values are interexchangeable) gives A = 3 1 + 7 , B = 3 1 − 7
Thus the desired product becomes
= 3 3 r = { α , β , γ } ∏ [ ( r − 3 1 + 3 7 ) ( r − 3 1 − 3 7 ) ] 2 7 r = { α , β , γ } ∏ [ ( r − 3 1 ) 2 − 9 7 ]
Let g ( x ) = f ( x + 3 1 ) = x 3 − 3 7 x + 2 7 7 be a cubic function with roots α ∗ = α − 3 1 , β ∗ = β − 3 1 , γ ∗ = γ − 3 1 . The product further simplifies to
2 7 r = { α ∗ , β ∗ , γ ∗ } ∏ [ r 2 − 9 7 ]
Now consider h ( x ) = g ( x ) = 0 be a cubic equation has roots ( α ∗ ) 2 , ( β ∗ ) 2 , ( γ ∗ ) 2
x x − 3 7 x + 2 7 7 x ( x − 3 7 ) 2 x 3 − 3 1 4 x 2 + 9 4 9 x − 7 2 9 4 9 = = = 0 ( 2 7 7 ) 2 0
So h ( x ) = x 3 − 3 1 4 x 2 + 9 4 9 x − 7 2 9 4 9 . Product becomes
2 7 r = { ( α ∗ ) 2 , ( β ∗ ) 2 , ( γ ∗ ) 2 } ∏ [ r − 9 7 ]
So the product above is simply − 2 7 (we multiply by − 1 because by Vieta's formula it's the constant term in a cubic equation) times by the coefficient of the constant term in the expansion of h ( x + 9 7 ) .
Hence, the answer is − 2 7 × [ ( 9 7 ) 3 − 3 1 4 ( 9 7 ) 2 + 9 4 9 ( 9 7 ) − 7 2 9 4 9 ] = − 4 9
This just shows that this problem could be solved without expanding the product and without the knowledge of the discriminant of the cubic equation, but doing so will look extremely ridiculous.
awesome approach ...
this is very cool, never seen such a thing!
Simply the best !!
I don't get it, you lost me at -27 and obtaining the solution how???
Discriminants and all that are messy. I just resorted to WolframAlpha :c
f ( x ) = x 3 − x 2 − 2 x + 1 = 0 ⇒ 1 = 2 x + x 2 − x 3
Hence, f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 − 2 x − 2 ( 2 x + x 2 − x 3 ) = x ( 2 x − 3 ) ( x + 2 ) .
Let the solutions for f ( x ) = 0 be a , b , and c .
We know that a b c = − 1 , a b + b c + c a = − 2 , a + b + c = 1 .
Therefore,
f ′ ( a ) f ′ ( b ) f ′ ( c ) = a b c [ ( 2 a − 3 ) ( 2 b − 3 ) ( 2 c − 3 ) ] [ ( a + 2 ) ( b + 2 ) ( c + 2 ) ]
= a b c [ 8 a b c − 1 2 ( a b + b c + c a ) + 1 8 ( a + b + c ) − 2 7 ] [ a b c + 2 ( a c + b c + c a ) + 4 ( a + b + c ) + 8 ]
= ( − 1 ) ( 7 ) ( 7 ) = − 4 9
Used TI-83 Plus, graphed the curve, found the roots and calculated the answer from the calculator.
The reason why this kind of solution is disliked on brilliant is because it used bashing and that solving question graphically removes the beauty of the question.
However, in physics... who cares? If it works, it works.
Log in to reply
Though I solve by graphing I totally agree with your comment ,"solving question graphically removes the beauty of the question". It for this reason I always mention how I have solved it. Since I do not want to loose point by asking to show answer I use this. I am not good at higher maths but want to know. I do not know web-site that can teach this. Can you or any one suggest a good website? Thanks.
Log in to reply
Actually there is plenty of information here on Brilliant.org in the wiki/learning sections, along with quizzes to test and reinforce your skills. The upside to brilliant is that it has a learned community that you can always interact with, and it has a sizeable collection of lessons on important mathematical methods and problems. You will find plenty of information on Wikipedia as well if you cannot find it here. Also I recommend "How to Prove it" by Velleman to learn logic and proof strategies.
Log in to reply
@Caleb Townsend – Thank you. I did not find sufficient in our wiki. I will try again.
Log in to reply
@Niranjan Khanderia – No problem. If you want to try a similar problem again without graphing, I posted one today, based on this problem. I assure you graphing is not required, and it can be solved easily without a graph if you are familiar with the properties of polynomials. If you are interested, here is the link to "Inspired by Vieta's Derivatives." I recently helped someone with a polynomial concept and while I was solving Vieta's Derivatives at the bank today, the idea came to me.
y(x)=3x^2-2x-2, evaluate y(-1.2470)×y(.44504)×y(1.8019)
=-48.9979
Wolframalpha
hello it was a really great solution but it is a level 5 question ,u know naa soo u have to solve it analytically ,please dont share such kind of solutions as we too know how do it computationally.
Let M = ⎝ ⎛ 0 1 0 0 0 1 − 1 2 1 ⎠ ⎞ the companion matrix of the polynomial f . The matrix M is similar to a triangular one with α , β , γ on its diagonal, so that for any polynomial g , the matrix g ( M ) is similar to a triangular one with g ( α ) , g ( β ) , g ( γ ) on its diagonal. Hence, the answer is the determinant of the matrix f ′ ( M ) = 3 M 2 − 2 M − 2 I 3 = ⎝ ⎛ − 2 − 2 3 − 3 4 1 − 1 − 1 5 ⎠ ⎞ .
Please explain more. Thanks.
Log in to reply
ß = a = 3/7 f ( x ). therefore. x = 2M.
For easy typing purposes, I will let α = a = x 1 , β = b = x 2 and γ = c = x 3
f ( x ) = x 3 − x 2 − 2 x + 1
f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 − 2 x − 2
f ′ ( α ) × f ′ ( β ) × f ′ ( γ )
= ( 3 x 1 2 − 2 x 1 − 2 ) ( 3 x 2 2 − 2 x 2 − 2 ) ( 3 x 3 2 − 2 x 3 − 2 )
= i = 1 ∏ 3 ( 3 x i 2 − 2 x i − 2 )
The rest of the problem is to find this product, which is exactly the same as this question
From Vieta's formula, we get:
a + b + c = 1
a b + a c + b c = − 2
a b c = − 1
Next, we simplify the product above by obtaining ( x i 3 − x i 2 ) in it:
i = 1 ∏ 3 ( 3 x i 2 − 2 x i − 2 )
= i = 1 ∏ 3 x i − 3 1 ( 3 x i 2 − 2 x i − 2 ) ( x i − 3 1 )
= i = 1 ∏ 3 x i − 3 1 3 x i 3 − 3 x i 2 − 3 4 x i + 3 2
= i = 1 ∏ 3 x i − 3 1 3 ( x i 3 − x i 2 ) − 3 4 x i + 3 2
Given that x i are the zeroes of the function, we get:
x i 3 − x i 2 − 2 x i + 1 = 0
x i 3 − x i 2 = 2 x i − 1
Substitute this into the product, and we get:
i = 1 ∏ 3 x i − 3 1 3 ( 2 x i − 1 ) − 3 4 x i + 3 2
= i = 1 ∏ 3 x i − 3 1 3 1 4 x i − 3 7
= i = 1 ∏ 3 3 x i − 1 7 ( 2 x i − 1 )
= ( 3 a − 1 ) ( 3 b − 1 ) ( 3 c − 1 ) 7 ( 2 a − 1 ) ( 7 ) ( 2 b − 1 ) ( 7 ) ( 2 c − 1 )
= 7 3 ( 2 7 a b c − 9 b c − 9 a c + 3 c − 9 a b + 3 b + 3 a − 1 8 a b c − 4 b c − 4 a c + 2 c − 4 a b + 2 b + 2 a − 1 )
= 7 3 ( 2 7 a b c − 9 ( a b + a c + b c ) + 3 ( a + b + c ) − 1 8 a b c − 4 ( a b + a c + b c ) + 2 ( a + b + c ) − 1 )
= 7 3 ( − 2 7 + 1 8 + 3 − 1 − 8 + 8 + 2 − 1 )
= 7 3 ( − 7 1 )
= − 7 2 = − 4 9
Notes: This solution was obtained from the solutions of the linked question above. I didn't come up with this solution, I just took someone else's solution and applied it here. All credits go to the people who shared their solutions in the linked question.
I also have another solution in the linked question, where I fully expanded the product into an expression of 27 terms and substituted the values in. Not the best method available, but if you want to try out that method, you can refer to my solution in the linked question for details.
Respect! Your solution really helps me a lot. Thank you!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We have f ( x ) = x 3 − x 2 − 2 x + 1 = ( x − α ) ( x − β ) ( x − γ )
⇒ f ′ ( x ) = ( x − α ) ( x − β ) + ( x − β ) ( x − γ ) + ( x − α ) ( x − γ )
So ,from this we may calculate f ′ ( α ) , f ′ ( β ) , and f ′ ( γ ) and get
f ′ ( α ) × f ′ ( β ) × f ′ ( γ ) = − ( α − β ) 2 ( β − γ ) 2 ( γ − α ) 2
Now, using the definition of discriminant we have
Δ = ( α − β ) 2 ( β − γ ) 2 ( γ − α ) 2
The discriminant for the cubic polynomial p x 3 + q x 2 + r x + s is given by Δ = q 2 r 2 − 4 p r 3 − 4 q 3 s − 2 7 p 2 s 2 + 1 8 p q r s
On calculation we get Δ = 4 9 , so our final answer is − 4 9 .