The first few powers of 101 all begin with 1, as highlighted by red colors below:
1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 = 1 0 1 = 1 0 2 0 1 = 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 = 1 0 4 0 6 0 4 0 1 ⋮
Is this always the case for all positive integer powers of 101?
Bonus: If it is the case, why? If not, what is the smallest power of 101 that doesn't start with a 1?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Short and sweet. That's what I like to see.
nice solution !
Yes much the simplest way
Great solution - oh, and whilst you could have written \ge, that would have only ended up with me whingeing 'What does \ge mean?'. But you can get ≥ on word's 'insert' list, or on the character map.
Oh, come for a new challenge and realize yesterday was the last I feel no sadness after finishing last year in school And I feel sad because that challenge is over
Maybe just because it is a SUMMER challenge
It was a bit longer than the whole summer
And it is gone
So the summer is absolutely gone
Cant understan. Janesh262@gmail.com. Pls explain to email
Examine the first few powers of 101. 1 0 1 1 = 1 0 0 1 + 1 1 1 0 1 2 = ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) 2 = 1 0 0 2 + 2 × 1 0 0 + 1 2 = 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 3 = ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) 3 = 1 0 0 3 + 3 × 1 0 0 2 + 3 × 1 0 0 + 1 3 = 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 As you can see, the leading digit comes from 1 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 3 and so on. Now, we'll look at the binomial expansion of 1 0 0 n . 1 0 1 n = ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) n 1 0 1 n = 1 0 0 n + ( 1 n ) 1 0 0 n − 1 + ( 2 n ) 1 0 0 n − 2 + ( 3 n ) 1 0 0 n − 3 + … + ( n n ) 1 0 0 n − n 1 0 1 n = 1 0 0 n + ξ So, the leading digit of the first few powers of 1 0 1 is 1 because 1 0 0 n is dominant in that region. Hence, we deduce the leading digit will be changed when ξ becomes equal to or greater than 1 0 0 n . (For example, we need to add 10000 with 10000 to get a number whose leading digit is not 1.) Therefore, the necessary condition is ξ ≥ 1 0 0 n Now, 1 0 1 n = 1 0 0 n + ξ ≥ 1 0 0 n + 1 0 0 n 1 0 1 n ≥ 2 × 1 0 0 n ( 1 0 0 1 0 1 ) n ≥ 2 Taking natural logarithm, (As it is a monotonically increasing function, inequality will still hold true.) n ( ln 1 0 1 − ln 1 0 0 ) ≥ ln 2 n ≥ ln 1 0 1 − ln 1 0 0 ln 2 ≈ 6 9 . 6 6 If we force n to be an integer, then n ≥ 7 0 So, the smallest power of 1 0 1 that doesn't start with a 1 is 7 0 .
For the record (and for anyone trying to confirm on a calculator), 1 0 1 7 0 is 141 digits long, and is:
2 0 0 6 7 6 3 3 6 8 3 9 5 3 8 3 7 1 2 9 7 3 7 4 6 1 9 5 3 2 5 9 0 4 2 2 5 1 1 7 4 6 8 7 8 1 5 7 6 1 8 0 8 3 8 6 9 2 4 2 8 6 6 1 2 0 0 8 6 3 0 3 4 7 6 8 9 5 4 3 5 6 9 0 1 7 9 3 6 7 1 4 6 2 6 7 1 0 8 0 5 4 5 7 7 0 9 6 0 3 0 8 5 4 6 9 4 0 7 3 6 7 7 9 0 9 1 0 6 8 8 4 2 6 4 1 5 7 0 0 1
Log in to reply
How did you get that? My calculator doesn't work in that limit!
Log in to reply
Some calculators have three-digit exponent. For example HP 35s.
what kind of calculator?
The calculator is rounding - see the actual full value in my Challenge Master note.
Log in to reply
if i remembered correctly, this problem was in the top 15 problems, a couple of months back....
good explanation,bro.now i understood the question.
Elegant solution !!
Whilst I did get the answer right, due to 101^n being equal to (100 + 1)^n = 100^n + (n choose 1) x 100^(n-1), I thought that it would need to be the 100th power of 101 that gave 2 as the first digit. Continuing with my error, this was because (100 choose 1) which equals 100 of course, would 'replace' the 2 digits multiplying the 100 by one less power. And for the next part of the binomial sequence (Again I am not sure whether I express this quite correctly?), you would have (100 choose 2) but this would not quite large enough to figure in the next digit. I now see that the addition of all these individual numbers which will combine to make it the 70th power that takes the first digit of the number equal to 2. I have either forgotten or did not know in the first place the rules which lead you to the answer of n>=70. VERY GOOD SOLUTION! Regards, David
How do you find a number that large? I could find the answer was yes, and at 101^70 by using Excel - but of course, I was only getting the first 4 digits by then. I remember a few years ago, doing the old 'rice on a chessboard' puzzle with a group of kids, and there came points where we had to split the numbers, and then add the septillions or whatever to the trillions or whatever and then to the units etc by hand.
Log in to reply
For the record, this occurs in a cyclic way- completing a cycle at 101^231, a 466 digit long number which precedes a power that begins with 1. The values of 101^x, 70<x<232 show a progression in the first place until it reaches 1, again, at the 232nd power. (I've provided the values of 101^231 and the subsequent power of 232) 101^231=995949559340661128482110883816932583882702854743496679182361699087772595389707248655 873246407856263808334049750494332982059505607051857784451444956473596406529632803358939420308873333957021184736095452133191288684060525439720689797334159031933774484856217842919900586645660560929840513347372207361776851368349142834057173708774074577618176272376879928983410963917795048567977722637236487538293365027617509388781806597226782169072451181685451147813610469560673101. (463 digits)
I got these values using comptune.com 's wonderful "Big Calculator" that lets us calculate upto a million digits! (Even though the UI might be confusing)
very nice solution
It is wrong answer
Log in to reply
Details, please!
Log in to reply
Where do we get our certificates??!!
Log in to reply
@Aniswar S K – There will be an email coming later today about the certificates.
@Aniswar S K – I don't know! Maybe @Jason Dyer can help.
I agree - a number of us have got the same answer through using different methods - can you show us your working that makes this answer wrong
Not pure maths. But imagine a bank paying 1% interest on a £1 deposit (yes I'm English!) forever. After n years you'd have £1*1.01^n. When you get to £2 in the account, that's when 101^n starts with 2!
Ha ha this is great, Max. Very similar to the way I solved it by inspection simply knowing the existence of the rule of 72 which tells you approximately the number of periods it will take for an investment to double when earning periodic interest rate r : ≈ 7 2 / r = 7 2 / 1 ≈ 7 2 periods, close enuf for this prob since all we need is the possibility of the factor of 2 . Well done!
Sort of how I did it. In my case, I just noticed that the numbers in the odd-number digits except for the first were increasing. There is nothing special about the leftmost digit that contains a non-zero value, so eventually the >1 values will ripple through.
Which guided guess. I wasn't dedicated to being right.
Excellent solution by visualisation - the more detailed efforts above show at exactly what point we get a power of 101 that starts with a digit other than 1.
thanks a lot very simple solution
Very well done, sir.
The function a n is monotonically increasing in n for all a > 1 . If we take a = 1 . 0 1 instead of 1 0 1 , then that does not affect the leading digit (the number is just scaled down by a factor 1 0 0 n ). The function 1 . 0 1 n will exceed 2 for some sufficiently large n . The first time it does so, it will still be less than 3 (because if 1 . 0 1 n ≥ 3 , then 1 . 0 1 n − 1 ≥ 2 , which contradicts the assumption that it 1 . 0 1 n − 1 < 1 ).
Hence, the leading digit will differ from 1 at some point. In fact, it is easy to see that every digit will be leading at some point, cycling through 1 , 2 , … , 9 , 1 , 2 , … .
I used a way that doesn't need l n or whatever that is quite complicated (to me). But I saw a pattern to it.
To make things simpler, we can first observe the pattern of the first few powers of 11:
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 = = = = = = 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 4 6 4 1 1 6 5 0 5 1
If you observe carefully, you can find a pattern of Pascal's Triangle in it.
Note: for 1 1 5 , you can find the answer by adding 1 × 1 0 5 + 5 × 1 0 4 + 1 0 × 1 0 3 + 1 0 × 1 0 2 + 5 × 1 0 1 + 1 × 1 0 0
Now, observe the pattern for the first few powers of 101 and you will find the pattern too.
1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 = = = = ⋮ 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 0 4 0 6 0 4 0 1
Now, obviously, sometime soon (we'll get to that later) the second number of the Pascal's Triangle will get to 100.
So the answer is NO
So, when? (Ah, we're here)
I can't think of a way to find it without using l n but we can find an approx. value for it.
Let's first observe the first 5 digits (Why 5 and not 3? Well it won't be so accurate. You'll get to an answer of 100) and ignore the other digits. You will find this pattern:
F i r s t f i v e d i g i t s o f 1 0 0 n = 1 0 0 0 0 + 1 0 0 n + 2 n ( n + 1 )
We must now solve 1 0 0 0 0 + 1 0 0 n + 2 n ( n + 1 ) ⩾ 2 0 0 0 0 − 1 0 0 0 0 + 1 0 0 n + 2 n ( n + 1 ) ⩾ 0 n 2 + 2 0 1 n − 2 0 0 0 0 ⩾ 0 We then find the value of n using the Quadratic Formula x = 2 a − b ± b 2 − 4 a c and we find
n ⩾ 2 1 ( 1 2 0 4 2 1 − 2 0 1 ) n ⩽ 2 1 ( − 1 2 0 4 2 1 − 2 0 1 )
Since we want the positive value, we choose n ⩾ 2 1 ( 1 2 0 4 2 1 − 2 0 1 ) which is approx. n ≥ 7 2 . 9 9 4 2 . The correct solution is actually 70. We are 3 apart from the answer
The claim about the first 5 digits of 1 0 1 n (I'm assuming that's a typo) isn't quite true, which is why your value of n is off. It's true for small enough numbers like what you studied, but what we have by the binomial theorem is: 1 0 1 n = ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) n = 1 0 0 n + 1 0 0 n − 1 × n + 1 0 0 n − 2 × 2 n ( n − 1 ) + 1 0 0 n − 3 × 6 n ( n − 1 ) ( n − 2 ) + … .
So, to find a counter example to the claim, let's check when 6 n ( n − 1 ) ( n − 2 ) > 1 0 0 , or when n = 1 0 . Indeed, from Wolfram we obtain that 1 0 1 1 0 = 1 1 0 4 6 … .
What is true though, is that 1 0 1 n = ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) n > 1 0 0 n + 1 0 0 n − 1 × n + 1 0 0 n − 2 × 2 n ( n − 1 )
And for n = 7 2 , we can see that 1 0 1 n > 2 × 1 0 1 4 4 . However, this isn't enough yet to conclude that the first digit is not 1. Do you see why?
I saw that the 3rd number grows by 1 for each power, therefore i thought that by 101^100 the first number had to become a 2, but then i realized i goes quicker than that.
Compound interest :-)
My student and I discovered a beautiful method for this last month while on a pattern finding expedition!
- Build a triangle with 101 at the top in the middle
- With each new row add a 1 on either end
- To find the numbers in the middle, take the sum of the two numbers above and diagonal. Like so:
As digits get carried it still works, it just gets sticky. Take a look at the 5th row for how this works:
And then go on as long as you want!
Since the rounding will keep spilling forward, the first digit will eventually be rounded up to 2 and so on and so forth. Also, the last 2 digits will always be 01. Great problem to end on!
I love your solution and I love the idea of a pattern finding expedition. One of my 'autistic person' skills is pattern recognition, which is possibly why I found this question quite easy to solve (never mind calculators or computer programs, I did not even use pen and paper). This problem and some of the solutions that people have provided will be appearing on my blog, http://aspi.blog in the near future.
this makes no sense...
The way I see it is the following: ( 1 + 1 / 1 0 0 ) 1 0 0 is approximately e . So 1 0 1 1 0 0 is about e × 1 0 0 1 0 0 who has a 2 as a first digit
One way of seeing this is by considering logarithms. A number n starts in a "1" if { 0 . 0 0 ≤ lo g 1 0 n } < 0 . 3 0 1 . Here, { x } stands for the fractional part of x .
Now lo g 1 0 1 0 1 n = n lo g 1 0 1 0 1 = 2 . 0 0 + ϵ where ϵ < 1 . Thus we may write lo g 1 0 1 0 1 n = 2 n + n ϵ , and as long as n < 1 / ϵ , { lo g 1 0 1 0 1 n } = n ϵ . Since ϵ is small, we can find a value of n such that 0 . 3 0 1 < n ϵ < 1 . 0 0 , which means that 1 0 1 n starts in a digit not equal to 1.
Bonus: The minimum value of n where this happens is the first integer greater than ϵ lo g 2 = lo g 1 . 0 1 lo g 2 = 6 9 . 7 . . . Thus, 1 0 1 7 0 does not start in 1; its first few digits are 2 0 0 6 7 6 3 3 6 8 3 9 5 3 8 5 …
101^n = 100^n (1 + 0.01)^n If n is big then (1 + 0.01)^n = 1 + 0.01 x n And obviously, we can find value n to make 1 + 0.01 x n >= 2
Jackie, sorry, but I don't see that your solution answers the question; have a good day, Ed Gray
199*101 = 20099. So, any number of the form 199.......... which is a power of 101 is likely to be a solution.
By trial and error, we find (101)^70= 2........141 digits. and (101)^69=198.......
So 70 seems to be the smallest power of 101 for which the leading digit is not a 1
1 9 9 is not a power of 1 0 1 .
i know. I was just giving an example. I have also qualified the statement 'Any number of the form 199....' with 'which is a power of 101'
We can also apply Knorecker's Approximation Theorem!!!
No, that would definitely not work. And it's called Kronecker's theorem not Knorecker's theorem. That is only useful in analytic number theory. Do you even fully understand Kronecker's and Dirichlet's approximation theorems?
Look at the sequence in the problem. The third digit of each line is: 1, 2, 3, 4. This appears to increase by 1 on each iteration. Is this the case?
Think of it this way: Multiplying a number x by 101 is equivalent to adding x to 100x. 100x is just x shifted left two places. The third digit of 100x will line up with the first digit of x. As long as the first digit is 1, this will increase the third digit by 1 on each iteration. On the tenth iteration, it'll spill over into the second digit, and by the 100th iterations, it'll hit the first digit, increasing it to 2.
In fact, it'll happen sooner than that, because lower digits will wind up affecting it too. But this simple reasoning shows us that the first digit will increase eventually, and gives us an upper bound for when.
The easiest way to see it is by looking at powers of 1.01. Each subsequent one adds more than 0.01 so 1.01^100 is more than 2. In fact, that's an approximation for e.
In my head I estimated the smallest such power to be between 60 and 70. The calculator confirmed it was 70.
Answered all 100 questions, what now?
101^n = 100^n * 1.01^n Multiplying by 100 doesn't change the first digit so first digit of 101^n = first digit of 1.01^n, which is trivially not always 1.
Since we want to see left most digit of 1 0 1 n , n ∈ N , we consider 1 0 1 n − 1 0 0 n . This value should at least 1 0 0 n . So 1 0 1 n − 1 0 0 n ≥ 1 0 0 n With a little logarithm magic, we have n ≥ 6 9 . 6 6 , so n = 7 0 is the smallest value of n that make 1 0 1 n doesn't start with 1.
Consider the function f(n) = 101^n. Clearly, f is monotonically increasing and is unbounded. Therefore, there must be a value of n for which the leading digit must be 2. Trial calculations reveal that: 1.99475766x10(^124) = 101^(69) and 2.014705236x10^(125)= (101)^(70). Ed Gray
The question doesn't say "all positive powers of 101." Then 101 to the -1 power does not begin with a 1.
This should not be a 5-star problem. It should be 3 stars or 4 stars.
The following statement is true until 101^69. But hereby, the power begins with 2.
I am a middle school student ,and thought about it this way.If you keep multiplying 101 it will slowly creep up.The one at the end will become a bigger number and take over the ones place.
Only up to the 69th power. 101^69 begins with the digits 1986… But 101^70 begins with the digits 2006… The first digit on 101^n is the same as the first digit of (1.01)^n.
Proof:
101=(1.01)∗(102)101=(1.01)∗(102)
101n=((1.01)∗(102))n=((1.01)n)∗(10(2∗n))101n=((1.01)∗(102))n=((1.01)n)∗(10(2∗n))
Eventually n is large enough that 2 < (1.01)^n < 3, in which case the first digit of 101^n will be 2.
My solution is not nearly as "mathematical" as some others, and probably rather simple-minded. Mine has to do with looking at the patterns in the results of each power.
The third digit from the left of each successive power increases by 1. If this pattern continues, then once we reach 101 to the 100th, the 1 as the first digit will change. Actually, it will probably occur sooner since the 5th digit is increasing by 3 with each power, but the question was just whether or not the first digit would always be 1.
1 0 1 1 0 0 = ( 1 . 0 1 1 0 0 ) 1 0 0 1 0 0 starts with 2 because 1 . 0 1 1 0 0 is very close to the natural logarithm base e = 2 . 7 1 . . . . . A calculator app on my tablet says 1 . 0 1 1 0 0 = 2 . 7 0 4 8 1 3 8 2 9 4 2 1 5 2 6 0 9 3 2 6 7 1 9 4 7 1 0 8 0 :-)
7 0 is the smallest power that doesn't start with a 1 .
There is actually a very simple shortcut to the solution that doesn't require any advanced math to discover. If you look at the third digit of the first four powers of 101, you might notice that these are integers in ascending order. If we ignore everything past the third digit, the powers of 101 begin to look like integers in ascending order, starting with 101. You can therefore determine that the 100th power of 101 can't start with a 1, and if it does, then some power of 101 before the 100th power can't start with a 1.
For the number not to begin with 1, it is necessary for the power to equal n*ln(2) or greater. This first happens at n=70, for which an answer of 2.00676...e140 is obtained. As a follow-up question, what is the next power of 101 to have an answer beginning with 1 once again?
because of the carry adds up to populate the zeroes ..
and the carry gets added up after 10, 9, 8, 7 , 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 additional powers.. in the second left digit
the second left digit will turn to zero with the carry 1 at the power 55 (if i am not wrong) ..
So after power 55, the first digit will no longer be 1.
-- no.. wrong... not 55. 70 is the right answer... as the additional power is of the form: 9, 9, 8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 6, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, ... that will keep retaining the same second left digit and after which 1 will be added as carry to the same.
seems to be a log curve indeed.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
1 0 1 n = 1 . 0 1 n × 1 0 0 n
So the smallest integer n for which 1 0 1 n starts with a 2 can be found from:
1 . 0 1 n > = 2
n × ln ( 1 . 0 1 ) > = ln ( 2 )
n > = ln ( 1 . 0 1 ) ln ( 2 ) = 6 9 . 6 6
The smallest power of 101 that doesn't start with a 1 is 70.