Four congruent circles, each with radius 6 cm, intersect as shown (their centers are marked in purple). What is the perimeter of the entire figure (marked in red)?
Try adding some line segments.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
666 ∆ Illuminati confirmed
Log in to reply
4 circles, 12 intersections, 12 divided by 4 is 3:O Confirmed
This is exactly how I solved it too!
This is my favourite solution.
How do we know that the triangles create a right angle?
Log in to reply
Connect all blue dots - by symmetry, they must form a square.
Log in to reply
As pointed out by Mark Hennings, that need not be the case. All that we are given is the quadrilaterial formed by the 4 centers has equal side lengths, so it could be a rhombus.
As it turns out, the answer is still the same.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – True, as overall the large angle negates the effect of the small angle.
Ok, I had missed the part that the purple points were the centers of the circles. Thanks
Is there any other way to solve this other than computing the arc length of a circle?
Log in to reply
Solve for arc length without computing arc length?
Log in to reply
I meant solving this problem
Log in to reply
@Scrub Lord – But the problem is asking for the arc length? It would be pretty impressive ;) Technically you could've estimated it and guessed the multiple choice :P
Although the picture is drawn to look as if the centres of the four circles form the corners of a square, this is not necessary. They must, however, form the vertices of a rhombus. If we consider the effect of the four equilateral triangles and the rhombus, the sum of the four exterior angles (marked in red - they do not have to be all equal, only equal in pairs) is
4
×
3
6
0
∘
−
8
×
6
0
∘
−
3
6
0
∘
=
6
0
0
∘
or
3
1
0
π
radians. Thus the total exterior arc length is
3
1
0
π
×
6
=
2
0
π
cm.
I think this answer is more accurate as it does not have to be a square in middle
The thing to realize is that the answer will remain the same in every possible scenario. This is explained in your answer. But I knew this as a pre-requisite, and so it is much more useful to solve the simplest case to provide the general answer, in exams where time limit is an issue.
Log in to reply
Perhaps, but solving problems under time constraints is not the ultimate aim of mathematics. If you are in an exam, where someone has checked that there is a single answer, then a shortcut will often get you to the answer. However, that shortcut has not taught you why that answer is unique. Personally, I find the "why" much more interesting than the simple answer.
Log in to reply
I quoted this comment in my own comment (in reply to a comment, which was a reply to my comment on his solution) without your permission. I hope that was alright.
Because there are 4 circles, we can just look at one of the circles, and try to find the angle of the red arc, then to find the length of the arc using the circumference.
Since we are looking for the red outer part, we can calculate the arc angle of the rest of the circle(the black inner part). When we connect two adjacent blue points, and the black dot 'tip,' we form a equilateral triangle, and since every circle has two of those, we already have 120 degrees.
Then, it is obvious that the center of the circles create a square, or another 90 degrees. From this, we know that the inner angle of the circle(not the red part) will be 210 degrees, so the outer black part will have an angle of 150.
Finally, we can calculate the actual length: Every circle will have a red part of 3 6 0 1 5 0 × 2 π r ( r = 6 ) ⟶ 1 2 5 × 1 2 π = 5 π per circle. Thus, the red outer rim of the 4 circles combined, and the answer to the problem would be 2 0 π
doesn't necessarily have to be a square right?
Log in to reply
Since the centers lie on all the circles it has to be a square.
@Wuu Yyiizzhhoouu , it is, since all sides are the same, and all the angles are 360.
^Mark Hennings' solution. and also they didnt say all sides are the same
@Wuu Yyiizzhhoouu , oh ok, but the 4 90s added together will still be 360 degrees
@Wuu Yyiizzhhoouu , in the big picture
Yeah the sum of the 4 angles will be 360
The given options are: 16π, 18π, 20π, 22π, 24π.
I will give a solution which includes more logic rather than math.
.
Radius = 6cm
Therefore,
circumference of each circle = 2πr = 12π
All 4 circles are identical
Thus, Circumference of all 4 circles = 4 • 12π = 48π
.
Now, out of the given options, only 16π, 20π and 24π are divisible by 4
Hence, 18π and 22π are not the correct answers; we strike them out
.
Half of 48π is 24π -- for 24π to be the correct answer, the red arc should be a semicircle which it is not as seen in the figure
Hence we strike out 24π.
.
If we observe the figure carefully, we find that red arc isn't even 1/3rd of the whole circumference.
Hence, we strike out 16π as it is 1/3rd of 48π
.
SO , the option which remains is 20π
Answer = 20π
Great! Logic to solve a geometry question!
That's how I did it too!
Now, out of the given options, only 16π, 20π and 24π are divisible by 4
Hence, 18π and 22π are not the correct answers; we strike them out
What if one red arc actually equals 4.5π or 5.5π? Divisibility rules does not always follow because lengths are not always integral in values. Also, in high school, we were always thought that geometric figures are liars! :))
Consider the triangle formed by the centers of two adjacent circles and their point of intersection on the outside of the shape. This is an equilateral triangle, with side length 6 cm. Therefore the central angle here is 6 0 ∘ above horizontal. That means its complement is 3 0 ∘ from vertical, as is the corresponding arc segment. By symmetry each circle contributes two copies of such a 3 0 ∘ arc to the perimeter of the shape, along with the main 9 0 ∘ contribution. Thus each circle contributes 6 5 th of a semicircle, i.e. 6 5 ∗ π ∗ 6 cm. Summing over the four corners gives us 4 ∗ 6 5 ∗ 6 ∗ π cm, i.e. 2 0 π cm.
Divide the shape into eight identical segments.
Draw segment DO, which is length 6cm
CO is perpendicular to DO
Triangle BOD is equilateral so Angle BOD = 60°
Therefore, angle BOC = 30°
Angle AOC = 45°
Total angle of segment AB = 45° + 30° = 75°
The total perimeter is made of eight segments, so 8 x 75° = 600°
Total perimeter = 2π r x 600° / 360° = 12 π x 600° / 360° = 20 π
LaTeX: The perimeter of one circle is : P = 2 × π × R then P = 2 × 6 × π = 1 2 π
LaTeX: As you can see, the radius defines an equilateral or regular triangle (EKB),
LaTeX: that is to say, each angle is equal to 3 π and the good news is that 6 equilateral triangles
LaTeX: can be inscribed into a cercle ! We get it ! The hexagone can now appear in the circle.
LaTeX: Let’s calculate the parts of the perimeter that has to be deduced of the main perimeter :
LaTeX: We have : 3 × 3 π and a 2 1 × 3 π
LaTeX: We get : 3 3 π + 6 π = 6 6 + 1 = 6 7
LaTeX: Now we have the total of all the angles added, we have to take into account the radius to
LaTeX: calculate the part of the perimeter to be deduced of the main perimeter : LaTeX: 6 7 π × 6 = 7 π
LaTeX: 1 2 π − 7 π = 5 π , but that’s not quite over, this is just the perimeter for one circle !
LaTeX: We just have to multiply by the 4 circles to get the overall perimeter required :
LaTeX: 5 π × 4 = 2 0 π
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Total Red Length = 4 × 3 6 0 1 5 0 × 2 π × 6 = 2 0 π