I'm thinking of two positive whole numbers that multiply to 1000, neither of which contain the digit 0. What is the sum of these 2 numbers?
Check the factors! What's true about any of them that contain a digit 0?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Good question! It's possible that the difficulty depends wholly on the solvers worldwide other than math and science fans. :)
Log in to reply
Surely the four circles inscribed in a 3-4-5 triangle yesterday was at least two cacti better than this.
Log in to reply
Yes, I agree with you for that one. I believe the best challenge is the billiard pocket one. It's the good problem.
Anywho, it doesn't require a lot of work to be able to answer the challenge questions. All you do is to get down the basics, and you are done. To me, I felt the way the challenge set is rushed. At first, you tried the billiard challenge, which has a reasonable difficulty. Then, the question thrown each day becomes like high-school type of problems other than Olympiad ones.
I agree! Here is a more interesting one: I'm thinking of three positive integers, all of which are greater than one and less than ten (between two and nine). There may or may not be duplicates. Now I change them so that the same conditions apply, while the SUM of the three integers remains the same, but their PRODUCT increases by one. What is the smallest pair of products that I can make in this way? Are there any others?
u r so good at explaining can u do that in my math class? (teacher sucks at explaining)#no offense teacher
The factors of 1 0 0 0 are
1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 1 0 , 2 0 , 2 5 , 4 0 , 5 0 , 1 0 0 , 1 2 5 , 2 0 0 , 2 5 0 , 5 0 0 , 1 0 0 0
Notice that all of the factors containing the digit 0 are multiples of 1 0 . Now, any multiple of 1 0 is of the form 2 a ⋅ 5 b for positive integers a and b . Thus, since neither of the numbers contain the digit 0 , they cannot be products of any permutation of 2 and 5 . This extends to the one-digit factors that are paired with factors that are multiples of 1 0 − namely, 2 ( × 5 0 0 ) , 4 ( × 2 5 0 ) , and 5 ( × 2 0 0 ) .
However, since 1 0 0 0 is a multiple of 1 0 , it must necessarily be of the form 2 a ⋅ 5 b . Indeed, its prime factorization is 2 3 ⋅ 5 3 , or 8 × 1 2 5 . Recall that 1 0 n = 2 a ⋅ 5 b , where a and b are positive integers. We can rewrite 1 0 0 0 's prime factorization as ( 2 3 × 5 0 ) ⋅ ( 2 0 × 5 3 ) . Neither number is a multiple of 1 0 , instead being only powers of 2 or powers of 5 , respectively.
Hence, our numbers are 8 and 1 2 5 , and the desired sum is 1 3 3 .
@Zach Abueg , we really liked your comment, and have converted it into a solution. If you subscribe to this solution, you will receive notifications about future comments.
Log in to reply
Thank you so much! By the way, will the 100 Day Summer Challenge and notifications ever be added to the app? I'm on the app as much as, if not more than, I am online, and it'd be really great if we had those features on the Brilliant app. Thanks for considering!
Log in to reply
Since the 100 Day Challenge is one-off, we're not planning on adding it into the app as yet.
Because every number with a 0 is divisible by both 2 and 5, we start by factoring 1000. 1 0 0 0 = 5 0 0 ∗ 2 = 2 5 0 ∗ 4 = 1 2 5 ∗ 8 = > 1 2 5 + 8 = 1 3 3 , which is our desired answer.
This question is not worded properly and therefore there are two solutions which are 8 + 125 = 133 and 4 + 250 = 254. The question should have been worded without any ambiguity so that the answer is unique. The reworded question would be "I'm thinking of two positive whole numbers that multiply to 1000, neither of which contain the digit 0. What is the lowest sum of these 2 numbers?"
Let the two numbers be m and n . Thus we have m n = 1 0 0 0 = 2 3 ⋅ 5 3 . Obviously one of these must be even, say m is even. If m contains any power of 5 , then m will be a multiple of 1 0 , which is not allowed. Thus it must be n that is divisible by 5 3 . Now if n is even, then it will be a multiple of 1 0 too, which is not allowed. So all of 2 3 must be contained in m . Therefore 2 3 ∣ m 5 3 ∣ n but m n = 1 0 0 0 . It follows that m = 2 3 = 8 and n = 5 3 = 1 2 5 , so m + n = 1 3 3 .
By listing all pairs of positive integers that multiply to 1 0 0 0 ,
1 0 0 0 = 1 × 1 0 0 0 = 2 × 5 0 0 = 4 × 2 5 0 = 5 × 2 0 0 = 8 × 1 2 5 = 1 0 × 1 0 0 = 2 0 × 5 0 = 2 5 × 4 0
we find that { 8 , 1 2 5 } is the only pair satisfying the condition.
Hence, the sum is 8 + 1 2 5 = 1 3 3 .
Numbers divisible by 10 are divisible by 2 and 5. 1 0 0 0 = 2 3 × 5 3 , so to make sure the numbers are not divisible by 10, we must make sure that we don't mix 2 and 5 in the same factor. Therefore, one factor must be only 2s and the other should be only 5s. This gives the two factors 8 and 125, which add together to 133.
The first thing came to my mind was " 1 2 5 × 8 = 1 0 0 0 " because we learned this in school as a concept. Both 125 & 8 don't contain the digit 0. So 1 2 5 + 8 = 1 3 3
factor 1000 into 5 5 5 2 2*2
do not do 5*2 because that = 10
5 5 5 and 2 2 2 do not do that
add them up
133
Make a systematic table of factor pairs
1 x 1000
2 x 500
4 x 250
5 x 200
8 x 125 <- this is it, it is the only factor pair with no zeros.
10 x 100
20 x 50
25 x 40
I agree that this problem is ridiculously easy.
I solved this quickly by recalling the first few common fractions as decimals:
2 1 = 0.5
3 1 = 0.333...
4 1 = 0.25
5 1 = 0.2
8 1 = 0.125
Factor these up and you have 2+500, 3+333.3..., 4+250, 5+200, 8+125. The only one here that really works is 8 1 and hark when you add 125 and 8 you get 133 which is one of the answers
The sum is 133. You can work out the prime factors of 1000 which are: 2, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5. These factors can also be written as 2 cubed and 5 cubed - 8 and 125. These are the two numbers the question talks about. Add these two together and you get 133 - the answer to the question.
250 x 4 =1000
So, I halved 250 to get 125 and then doubled 4 to get 8; 125 x 8 =1000
125 + 8 = 133
1000 = 10 * 10 * 10 = 5 * 2 * 5 * 2 * 5 * 2 = (5 ^ 3) * (2 ^ 3) = 125 * 8 (Answer)
Note that 1 0 0 0 = 2 3 5 3 . The only factors that don't involve 0 is 2 3 = 8 and 5 3 = 1 2 5 , and their sum is 8 + 1 2 5 = 1 3 3 .
So each number can't end in 0
x*y=1000
x+y=
x = 125
y = 8
125*8=100
125+8=133
So 133 is the answer
There is no need to factor 1000 in order to find the correct answer. Since the product of the two numbers is 1000, one of them must be divisible by 5. Since that number does not contain a zero digit, it must not be divisible by 2. Hence the other number must be even, and the sum of the two numbers must be odd. Since 1001 is too large to be the sum of two numbers whose product is 1000, that leaves 133 as the only possible answer.
1000 factors to 5^3x2^3 (5x5x5x2x2x2). Since any number that has factors of 5 and 2 has the ones digit as a zero, the 5's and 2's must stay separate. This means that the two factors must be 125 (5^3) and 8 (2^3). 125+8=133
1000 has a prime factorization of (2•2•2) • (5•5•5). Considered separately, each prime factor family contributes four factors: (2•2•2) contributes the four factors 1, 2, 4 and 8, while (5•5•5) contributes the four factors (1, 5, 25 and 125). Combined, this leads to 1000 having 16 factors: (1, 2, 4, 8) • (1, 5, 25, 125) or 8 factor-pairs. The eight factor pairs are: 1•1000, 2•500, 4•250, 5•200, 8•125, 10•100, 20•50 and 25•40. Only 8•125 is a factor-pair where neither factor contains a 0 digit. An ending 0 digit would result when a factor of 2 combines with a factor of 5. Therefore, the sum 8+125 = 133 is the answer.
BTW, methinks writing the solution for this challenge was more challenging than the actual challenge!
5 x 2 is the basic power of ten combo. So the third power of 10. 5 to the third is 125, 2 to the third is 8.
factorize 1000 that gives you 2x2x2x5x5x5. the digit mustn't have 0, so we should not multiply 5 and 2 together but separately. That gives 2x2x2=8 and 5x5x5=125
1000 = 8 * 125 125 + 8 = 133
Factoring 1000 we have 1 0 0 0 = 2 3 ⋅ 5 3 so now we have to find a divider of 1000 that ends with no zeros.
A number ends with zero when in his factorization a 2 and a 5 appear, so our divider's factorization won't have a 2 and a 5 together.
So one number will be 2 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 2 = 2 3 = 8 and the other 5 ⋅ 5 ⋅ 5 = 5 3 = 1 2 5 .
8 + 1 2 5 = 1 3 3
1 0 0 0 = 1 0 × 1 0 × 1 0 = 1 0 3
Factors of 10 are (10, 1) or (2, 5). We know that any factor of 1000 that is divisible by 10 must contain a zero digit, which is not allowed.
⇒ 1 0 0 0 = ( 2 × 5 ) 3 = ( 2 3 + 5 3 )
Σ ( 2 3 + 5 3 ) = ( 8 + 1 2 5 ) = 1 3 3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The sum is 133.
Simply factor 1000 into 5x5x5x2x2x2. Once a 5 and 2 are used to form a factor a zero appears since the number will be a multiple of 10. That leaves the single possibility of 8 and 125 that sums to 133.
The real question is: why is this puzzle rated more than one cactus?