66 of 100: Cutting Corners

Geometry Level 1

27 unit cubes are packed together to create this 3 × 3 × 3 3\times 3\times 3 cube. Each face of a unit cube has an area of 1.

If all 8 of the corner cubes are removed, by how much will the surface area of the figure increase?

Focus on just one of the corners.

0 4 8 16 24

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

12 solutions

Imagine we remove a corner

There were THREE sides before removing

There are still THREE sides after removing

Nice and clear. Great job!

Angel ONG - 3 years, 10 months ago

appreciated! and upvoted @Nikita Mahilewets

nibedan mukherjee - 3 years, 10 months ago

Just remove one unit cube from the top corner.

There will be 3 new surfaces with the loss of 3 old surfaces. So, ultimately total surface area won't change.

This thing will happen for all 8 corner cubes.

So, surface area change will be 0.

A good answer and optical illusion :))

Kazem Sepehrinia - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Is it a cube missing a corner or a cube suspended on the corner of a wall? :)

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes exactly :)

Kazem Sepehrinia - 3 years, 10 months ago

Very lucid, and as 'a picture paints 1,000 words' how did you generate your picture of the cube with one corner missing? Most respectfully yours, David

David Fairer - 3 years, 10 months ago

What did you use to make this picture? I really like it :)

Anna Rosner - 3 years, 9 months ago
Mohammad Khaza
Aug 4, 2017

if all 8 8 of the corner cubes are removed it will be still 3 × 3 × 3 3 \times 3 \times 3 cube.

so,its area will be= 6 a 2 6a^2 = 3 × 3 × 6 3 \times 3 \times 6 = 54 54

so, its surface area will not increase or change

Wtf that is not right

Joe Aulicino - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

why this is not right?

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Well area is not 3^3. That's volume. Area would be 3x3x6(there are six sides with 9 tiles on each).

Joe Aulicino - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Joe Aulicino oh ! thanks.i wrote the wrong formula of area.now i have changed that.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Your explanation does not make sense to me. The object after removing the 8 corner is no longer a cube. It is a more complex shape than a cube. So how can you say it is still a cube?

Todd Mabey - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

think carefully from the corner, you will understand. if you still unable to get that, just tell me.i will give the explanation.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

The more careful I think, the less your statement makes sense. If I start with a perfect cube and notch out the corners, it can't be called a cube anymore. It's been altered. A 3x3x3 cube has a volume of 27, do you agree? After removing the corner elements, you have reduced the volume by 8, leaving 19. It is no longer a 3x3x3 cube. Why is this not obvious? (Yes, I know that the problem presented is about the surface area, but my discussion of volume serves to demonstrate my point.)

Todd Mabey - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Todd Mabey oh! i understood your point. obviously volume will change.there is no doubt

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Sweet. Sorry I was a rude initially

Joe Aulicino - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

that's okay.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Any chance you can remove the statement saying it will still be 3 x 3 x 3 cube? Come to think of it, you haven't really presented an argument here.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 10 months ago
Robert DeLisle
Aug 5, 2017

Each cube has six faces. The corner cubes expose 3 and hide 3. Once removed the hidden 3 are exposed when there is no net change in the number of exposed faces. The answer is zero.

The wonder is that after taking out over 1/4 of the cubes, a volume reduction from 27 to 19, there is no -reduction- in surface area !

The surface area for C unit cubes joined face to face into a single unit is given by S = 6C - 2M where S is surface area and M is the number of face to face meetings. Removing the corners reduces C by 8, but also reduces M by 24 (3 per corner) with no net change in surface area. The same surface area now has a volume of only 19.

It remains to show that the cube is the optimal container (made with unit cubes that is) with volume 27 contained in surface area 54 while the worst case is 27 cubes in a row when a surface area of 110, over twice as much, contains the same volume.

Stefano Gallenda
Aug 5, 2017

For each corner we remove three external faces but reveal other three hidden faces, so we have no area changes.

Ratnadip Kuri
Aug 4, 2017

While, Each face of cube have area 1 than three faces surface area is involve in total 3 x 3 x 3 cube for each small cube. If we remove 1 small cube it will also leave three faces surface area. So, ultimately there will be no change of surface area for removing small cubes from every corner.

Abby Titlow
May 20, 2020

If you removed one corner block that would be three sides that you are removing. In its place is also three sides. That is 0 new sides. If you do the same to all of the other corners, each one will be 0. In total it is still 0.

Michael King
Aug 6, 2017

The area of the top of the cube underlying each removed cube is the same as that of each removed cube. The same holds true for each of the adjacent vertical faces revealed when the cubes are removed. Hence, the surface area remains the same whether the corner cubes are removed or left in place. As the surface area does not change, the amount of the increase is 0.

If x is the total surface area of the cube, we could say that x 24 + 24 x-24+24 would equal x x , so the surface area would increase by 0 **0**

Mark Dawes
Aug 5, 2017

With the original cube, if you look directly at the yellow face you will see 9 squares. If you look directly at any of the other faces you won't see these yellow squares again.

Now remove the eight corner cubes. When you look at the yellow face you will still see 9 squares. You won't see these squares if you look directly at any other face.

This means the surface area hasn't changed.

If, however, you were to remove a strip of three cubes from along one edge (eg the three cubes that have both yellow and green on them) then when you look at the blue face you will only see 8 squares. Here the surface area will decrease.

If you instead remove the centre cube from one of the faces there are parts of the new shape that you cannot see if look directly at any of the faces, so the surface area will increase.

Hansen Yang
Aug 5, 2017

A cube is the same as no cube

Sundar R
Aug 4, 2017

The area of one of the faces of each small cube is 1/9. So, if we remove the corner cubes,on each face we are left with 5 of these for a surface area on each face of 5/9. There are 6 faces . So the total surface area (without the corner cubes) is 6 * (5/9) = 30/9. Now the area exposed due to the removal of each corner cube is 3 * (1/9) and there are 8 of these for a total surface area of 8 * (3/9) = 24/9, for a combined area of (30+24)/9 = 6 which is the original surface area.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...