Dealing with Primes

Given 2 prime numbers, I compute their sum and their absolute difference, which again turn out to be both prime. So, now I have 4 prime numbers, whose sum is __________ . \text{\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_}.


The answer is 17.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

We know that a b a-b and a + b a+b are either both odd or both even.

They are primes \Rightarrow They both are odd. \therefore One of a , b a,b is odd and the other is even.

2 2 is the only even prime.

b = 2 \therefore\space b\space =\space 2 .

Hence, a 2 , a , a + 2 a-2,\space a,\space a+2 are consecutive odd primes. Hence they are 3 , 5 , 7 3,\space 5,\space 7 .

5 , 2 , 5 2 , 5 + 2 5,\space 2,\space 5-2,\space 5+2 are all prime.

Sum is 2 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 17 2+3+5+7=17 , which is a prime.

Thank you for sharing your solution.

Hana Wehbi - 3 years, 11 months ago

How can you prove that 3 , 5 , 7 3, 5, 7 are the only consecutive odd primes in the infinite range of primes?

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Because one of them must be a multiple of 3 3 .

Shourya Pandey - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Precisely. Can you rigorously prove that?

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

@Zach Abueg Amongst the integers a 2 , a , a + 2 a-2,a,a+2 the difference between any two of them is not a multiple of 3 3 . Thus they must form a complete residue system modulo 3 3 . Therefore one of them must be 0 ( m o d 3 ) 0 \pmod 3 .

Shourya Pandey - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

@Shourya Pandey Yes! Thank you, Shourya :)

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 11 months ago

@Zach Abueg Since (a-2), a and (a+2) are expected to be primes, the same should not be divisible by 2 or 3 and therefore, they are of the form (6n-1) or (6n+1).
Let us say, (a+2) = (6n+1), then
a = (6n-1) and (a-2) = (6n-3)=3(2n-1)
Since a-2 = 3(2n-1) is a multiple of 3, it can be prime only if it is 3 itself.
So, 6n-3 = 3 implies n=1 and, therefore, a+2=7, a=5 and a-2=3.


Auro Light - 3 years, 10 months ago

Thank you for sharing your solution.

Hana Wehbi - 2 years, 7 months ago
Auro Light
Sep 12, 2017

All the primes are odd numbers except one which is 2.
In the instant case, since the sum as well as the difference of two primes are also prime numbers, it is necessary that one of the prime numbers is even i.e. 2 otherwise, their sum and difference would result into two even numbers and hence not prime. Let the other prime, being odd number, be (2n+1).
The remaining two primes would be,
(2n+1) - 2 = (2n - 1) and,
(2n+1) + 2 = (2n+3)
Arranging them in ascending order, the 4 primes are :
1. 2,
2. (2n - 1) = {2(n - 2) + 3},
3. (2n + 1)= {2(n - 1) + 3},
4. (2n + 3) = {2(n) + 3},
Since (n - 2), (n - 1) and n are three consecutive numbers, one of the prime has to be a multiple of 3. Since the only prime which is a multiple of three, is 3 itself, the smallest odd prime is 3, hence we have,
2n - 1 = 3 or 2n = 4, so n = 2, The remaining two prime numbers are
2n + 1 = 5, and
2n + 3 = 7,
So, sum of 4 prime numbers
= 2+3+5+7 = 17 .

Thank you for sharing a nice solution.

Hana Wehbi - 3 years, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...