If half of the earth is blown away by the impact of a comet, what happens to the orbit of the moon?
During impact
After impact
Details and Assumptions:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The argument above gives that the moon would have exactly the escape velocity IF the initial distance from the moon to the center of mass of the remaining half earth were the old r0. However, as per the figure, the remaining half has a center slightly closer to the moon, so the potential energy will be very slightly more negative than the kinetic energy and we get a highly elliptical orbit.
Log in to reply
But if you look at the effective potential, the energy increases for r < r 0 and becomes slightly positive after the impact when the moon is slightly closer to the center of the earth's halves. The negative gravitational energy would be overcompensated by the rotational energy m r 2 L 2 , since we assumed the conservation of angular momentum.
Log in to reply
This comes down to a question of what conservation of angular momentum means. I took this problem to be that the Moon is a "spectator" and its instantaneous position and velocity are unchanged by the ejection of half the earth. That means the angular momentum is unchanged relative to the original center of the earth. However, the moon is now in orbit about a slightly closer point and so, L = m v R is now slightly less relative to the new center of rotation. The L^2 / 2 m R^2 term is simply the kinetic energy of the moon when in a circular orbit, m v^2 /2, and this is not going to change if v(moon) does not change.
Log in to reply
@Kevin Lehmann – You have a point. It's plausible to assume that the moon remains its velocity, so that the angular momentum might change a bit, because the center of mass has moved. The problem is not very precise at this point. However, it would be only a minor change in the distance (-0.6%), so that the maximal radius in the elliptical orbit would be very high (approx. 128E+6 km) and the orbit of the moon would interfere with other planets and is disturbed by the sun. Realistically, no stable orbit would be possible.
In a circular orbit, the total energy of the moon is E = K + U , with U = − 2 K ( virial theorem ). Since E = − K < 0 , the moon remains bound to the earth.
By halving the mass of the earth, the potential energy becomes half of its original value, i.e. U = − K . The total energy becomes E = 0 , meaning that the moon is no longer bound to the earth. It will travel away from the earth in a parabolic path; as its distance to the earth increases, its speed will approach zero.
I think this is incredibly neat as far as a solution goes but I can't help but wonder if it's a mathematical coincidence of if it is indeed true? Doesn't matter anyway because I was really impressed, so thanks :)
I am having trouble understanding why the total energy becomes zero as I thought the kinetic energy would decrease by half as well. Could you explain further?
Log in to reply
The impact does not affect the moon's motion directly. Its mass and velocity remain the same, and therefore K remains the same as it was before.
There is no longer an Earth, so the moon simply leaves. :-D
No, there's an Earth, it's just half the size.
Of course, this problem ignores the question of the moon's position during the comet collision. There's a slight chance that the destroyed earth bits could have been pushed into the moon's path, thus destroying the moon outright.
Apply a more better logic than this
lmao your solution is jokes
Why dont you also leave into the outer space just like the moon.....lol.
The orbital velocity along a circular path at a distance 'r' from earth is the same as escape velocity at the same distance if mass of earth is halved, the moon escapes from earth's gravitational field
The velocity of the moon as an object in circular orbit is
V_orbit=sqrt(GM/R)
The escape velocity of moon right after the impact is
V_escape=sqrt(2G*(M/2)/R)=sqrt(GM/R)
Hence, the moon will leave its orbit around the earth and, since the two velocities are equal, will eventually come to a stop.
-m-
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Lagrangian Mechanics
The velocity v of the moon is composed of a radial velocity r ˙ and a tangential velocity r ϕ ˙ whose vectors are perpendicular to each other. Therefore, the total energy can be converted to E = 2 1 m v 2 + V ( r ) = 2 1 m r ˙ 2 + 2 1 m r 2 ϕ ˙ 2 + V ( r ) = 2 1 m r ˙ 2 + 2 m r 2 L 2 + V ( r ) = 2 1 m r ˙ 2 + V eff ( r ) with the angular momentum L and the effective potential V eff ( r ) = 2 m r 2 L 2 − G r M m which contains the kinetic energy of the angular motion. This representation has the advantage, that the energy depends only on the radius r and its velocity r ˙ , so that we describe a motion in one dimension. The function V eff ( r ) takes the following form:
For a given energy
E
, the radial distance
r
can only assume values with
V
eff
(
r
)
≤
E
.
Therefore, we can distinguish two cases:
E < 0 : The radial distance is bounded by a minimal radius r min and maximal radius r max , so that r min ≤ r ≤ r max . The orbit is a closed elliptical orbit. For the special case r max = r min = r 0 (minimum of V eff ( r ) , the orbit has a perfect circular shape.
E ≥ 0 : There is no maximum radius r max , so that the radial distance r can take abitrary large values. The orbits are open, so that the moon orbits the earth only once, then continually moves away from it and never returns.
Before the impact, the moon has a circular orbit with radius r 0 , so that effective potential is minimal V eff ′ ( r 0 ) = − m r 0 3 L 2 + G r 0 2 M m = ! 0 ⇒ r 0 = G M m 2 L 2 After the impact, the moon's potential takes the value V eff ( r 0 ) = m r 0 2 L 2 + G r 0 ( M / 2 ) m = 0 This fulfills the condition for an open orbit so that the moon leaves the Earth orbit.