∫ 0 ∞ e − ( x 2 + 4 x − 2 ) d x = ?
Details and Assumptions
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I = ∫ 0 ∞ e − ( x 2 + x 2 4 ) d x
x = t 2
I = ∫ 0 ∞ t 2 2 e − ( t 2 + t 2 4 ) d t = ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 2 e − ( x 2 + x 2 4 ) d x
2 I = ∫ 0 ∞ ( 1 + x 2 2 ) e − ( x 2 + x 2 4 ) d x = ∫ 0 ∞ ( 1 + x 2 2 ) e − ( ( x − x 2 ) 2 + 4 ) d x
x − x 2 = y
2 I = ∫ − ∞ ∞ e − ( y 2 + 4 ) d y = e − 4 ∫ − ∞ ∞ e − y 2 d y
integral is a standard gaussian integral
2 I = e − 4 π
I = 2 e 4 π
Log in to reply
Nice, Theres another way it can be done without using gaussian integral as well, i shall tag you after posting solution
Log in to reply
@Mvs Saketh can u post the solution to this problem Thanks
@Mvs Saketh No there isn't. Even if we take your method of differentiating the integral we would get a differential equation in terms of a as I'(a) =-2I(a). Solving it we would have I ( a ) = C e − 2 a To evaluate the constant C you would have to put a=0 and thereby you would arrive at the gaussian integral and the constant C would evaluate to nothing but 2 π . So in anyways whether you do it by @U Z method or by your method you would need the gaussian integral at some step or the other.
Log in to reply
Thanks what was your method?
what are gaussian integral?
Log in to reply
the integral of e − x 2 over entire line is π . It is used for statistics, analysis and advanced calculus
Log in to reply
@Figel Ilham – Sorry, but I think you made a mistake , it should be e^{-x^{2}} to get e − x 2
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Oh yeah. I use the brackets instead the curly one. I'll fix it.. Thanks for reminding me
HI ,I think this might be of interest to you :)
I think that I did correct in waiting for this problem to get rated !!
PLZ POST UR SOLNNNNN
Firstly let x = t*root(2)
Then replace t by 1/t and add the two integrals
Now substitute t-1/t = y and taking somethings common you will get the pretty standard gaussian integral!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I will give a hint only, if someone requires the answer, then comment
Let the integral be 'I' replace '2' with a varriable 'a' now put a/x = z
differentiate 'I' with respect to 'a',
and you will know where to go next :)