How many function(s) f ( x ) satisfies the condition
f ( x ) = f ′ ( x )
where f ′ ( x ) means the derivative of f ( x ) respect to x ?
If you think the answer is infinitely many, submit your answer as -1.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Christian Daang , Please Remove this answer box , and keep a MCQ. Because anyone can 1st put 1 can check as he has 2 chances left. If you like, you may do it.
Log in to reply
I try to edit the question, I think, it is okay now. :)
Formally, this proves "If y = f ( x ) > 0 is a solution to f ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) , then y = e x − c for some c ∈ R ."
In contrast, the proof [and it is a proof] that there are infinitely many such functions is one line: ∀ c ∈ R : d x d [ e x − c ] = e x − c .
You should be comfortable calling both "proof"
Log in to reply
Ya, but I deduced the equation e x − c from the given equation where as he just gave us the equation. So i call it a complete one.
Log in to reply
You need to be careful. I feel like in your quest for some idea of "proof", you aren't looking at what you've technically shown...
You didn't technically show all the functions of the form f ( x ) = e x − c are solutions. You only showed that if f ( x ) is a positive solution, then it has that form for some real c . (given the form of your proof, it would still be possible for there to be no solutions!!)
To prove that all of those functions are solutions, you would need to take the derivative and see it gives itself. Then to show you have infinitely many solution, you need to show that { e x − c : c ∈ R } is an infinite set.
Log in to reply
@Brian Moehring – Ok sir, Please cool down. Okay. So i Agree my mistake. Thank you. Very Sorry.
Log in to reply
@Md Zuhair – Oh, I never was mad (emotion is one of those things that doesn't come through very well in text), and there's no reason to apologize.
I simply see a lot of very bright students who refuse to check whether they've proven what they intended to prove. If nothing else, you should just take my comments as someone on the internet claiming that learning to critique your own proofs is an incredibly valuable skill, and that it's usually as profitable as writing the proof itself.
Log in to reply
@Brian Moehring – Ya sir, Sure. I will keep it in mind. And i will accept all kinds of comments on my solutions. Thank you.
The possible example of function f ( x ) is e x + k where k ∈ R which means there are infinitely many functions that satisfy the condition.
FYI I've made the infinite case yield a value of -1, so that people who think there is a unique solution will realize that they made a mistake (instead of assuming that they are correct).
Log in to reply
It still says 1 in the original problem (which is what I put since there are infinite solutions).
Log in to reply
Ah yes, I saved over my edit. Those who answered 1 have been marked correct.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Okay, So this can be mathematically proved as below,
IF f ( x ) = y (Say) And f ′ ( x ) = d x d y . So,
By our equation y = d x d y
Hence d x = y d y
hence INTEGRATING EACH SIDE WE GET
x = l n y + c Where c is the constant of integration
Hence x − c = l n y
Or e x − c = y
or, y = e x − c .
Hence there are infinitely many solutions for any c ϵ R