Djrk-Jlxjd postulate

k = 1 99988 k 99988 \large \sum_{k=1}^{99988} k^{99988}

If we are given that 99989 is a prime number, what is the remainder when the expression above is divided by 99989?


The answer is 99988.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Prasun Biswas
Jun 20, 2015

Since 0 0 and 99989 99989 are two consecutive multiples of 99989 99989 (which is a prime), we know that 99989 ∤ k 1 k 99988 99989\not\mid k~\forall~1\leq k\leq 99988 where k Z k\in\Bbb Z .

Now, we use Fermat's Little Theorem which states (with prime p p ),

a p 1 1 ( m o d p ) a Z p ∤ a a^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod{p}~\forall~a\in\Bbb{Z}~\land~p\not\mid a

The given sum becomes,

k = 1 99988 k 99988 k = 1 99988 1 99988 ( m o d 99989 ) \sum_{k=1}^{99988} k^{99988}\equiv \sum_{k=1}^{99988}1\equiv 99988\pmod{99989}

Moderator note:

Yes. Splitting the sum into individual terms makes Fermat's Little Theorem much more apparent.

@Prasun Biswas , we really liked your comment, and have converted it into a solution. If you subscribe to this solution, you will receive notifications about future comments.

Brilliant Mathematics Staff - 5 years, 11 months ago
Gari Chua
Jun 17, 2015

Repeatedly use Fermat's Little Theorem.

Uhmmm... Will you please elaborate? This is not a proper solution.

Mehul Arora - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Since 0 0 and 99989 99989 are two consecutive multiples of 99989 99989 (which is a prime), we know that 99989 ∤ k 1 k 99988 99989\not\mid k~\forall~1\leq k\leq 99988 where k Z k\in\Bbb Z .

Now, we use Fermat's Little Theorem which states (with prime p p ),

a p 1 1 ( m o d p ) a Z p ∤ a a^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod{p}~\forall~a\in\Bbb{Z}~\land~p\not\mid a

The given sum becomes,

k = 1 99988 k 99988 k = 1 99988 1 99988 ( m o d 99989 ) \sum_{k=1}^{99988} k^{99988}\equiv \sum_{k=1}^{99988}1\equiv 99988\pmod{99989}


The solution by Gari is correct although I think he should elaborate it to make it more understandable to others.

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh crap, it was that EASY????? I was using some unsolved conjecture to set up this question. GODDAMNIT. Ugghhhh

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh I'd like to know about the conjecture you're referring to. Provide a link to the paper here maybe?

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

@Prasun Biswas Hint hint: decrypt the title of my problem. Caesar cipher +3.

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Thanks ! :D

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 12 months ago

@Pi Han Goh Your question should be the other way around, in that case. (Just read the Wikipedia page; one direction (prime to the equation) is clear with Fermat's Little Theorem, but the other direction is the conjecture.)

Ivan Koswara - 5 years, 11 months ago

Why the hell do you get Downvotes??

This was really Good :D

Mehul Arora - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora Glad it helped. :)

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

@Prasun Biswas Some people on B'ant -_-

:)

Mehul Arora - 5 years, 12 months ago

Divide each term by 99989. By Fermat Little Theorm you will get remainder one in each case. In total 99988 terms so remainder is 99988.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...