Does it exist?

Algebra Level 3

Does there exist a sequence { a n } n N \left\{ a_n \right\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} that satisfies the following equation?

a i + a j = a i j , i , j N , i > j a_i + a_j = a_{i-j}, \quad \forall i,j \in \mathbb{N}, i>j

If it exists, then submit a 2018 a_{2018} , if it doesn't exist, submit 1 -1 .


The answer is 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Henry U
Dec 28, 2018

If we plug in i = 2 n , j = n , n N i=2n, j=n, n \in \mathbb{N} into the functional equation, we get

a 2 n + a n = a 2 n n = a n a 2 n + a n = a n a 2 n = 0 \begin{aligned} a_{2n} + a_n & = a_{2n-n} \\ & = a_n \\ & \Rightarrow a_{2n} + a_n = a_n \\ & \Rightarrow a_{2n} = 0 \end{aligned}

2018 = 2 1009 a 2018 = 0 2018 = 2 \cdot 1009 \Rightarrow a_{2018} = \boxed{0}


Now, we plug in i = n + 2 k , j = n , k N i={n+2k}, j=n, k \in \mathbb{N}

a n + 2 k + a n = a 2 k = 0 a n + 2 k = a n a_{n+2k}+a_n=a_{2k}=0 \Leftrightarrow a_{n+2k}=-a_n .

Furthermore, we can compare i = n + 1 , j = n i=n+1, j=n to i = n + 2 , j = n + 1 i=n+2, j=n+1

a n + 1 + a n = a 1 = a n + 2 + a n + 1 a n + 2 = a n a_{n+1}+a_n=a_1=a_{n+2}+a_{n+1} \Leftrightarrow a_{n+2} = a_n

What we've now found out is

  • a 2 n = 0 a_{2n}=0
  • a n + 2 = a n a_{n+2}=a_n
  • a n + 2 k = a n a_{n+2k}=-a_n

From the second and third equation, for k = 1 k=1 it follows

a n + 2 = a n = a n + 2 a n + 2 = 0 a_{n+2}=a_n=-a_{n+2} \Leftrightarrow a_{n+2} = 0

and therefore, the only sequence that satisfies all conditions is

a n = 0 , n N a_n = 0, \quad \forall n \in \mathbb N

True but for the purposes of this problem, since you ask for the solution, don't you have to show that this is the only possible solution? Or at least that all possible solutions lead to a 2018 a_{2018} being 0?

Geoff Pilling - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

This is what I do in the first part of the solution. I only use given information (the functional equation) and derive a 2 n = 0 a_{2n} = 0 , which is one part of the answer.

Then, I show that such a sequence actually exists by giving an example, tbe second part of the answer.

The question was "If such a sequence exists, then submit a 2018 a_{2018} , else submit 1 -1 ." It does exist (part 2) and a 2018 a_{2018} is 0 (part 1).

Henry U - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

There could be other sequences that satisfy the conditions, but for all of them a 2018 a_{2018} is 0, so I didn't have to derive them.

Henry U - 2 years, 5 months ago

Oooops... You are right... Didn't read it carefully enough... By the way, nice problem! But I think the m subscript in your solution is a typo?

Geoff Pilling - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Geoff Pilling Thanks, fixed it.

Henry U - 2 years, 5 months ago

A better way to look at it would be to plug in i = k + 1 i = k+1 and j = k j = k It boils down to a i + 1 + a i = a 1 a_{i+1} + a_{i} = a_{1} Now giving a 1 a_{1} some value and building the series up, we can see that all terms with even index must be equal to zero.

Abhinav Raichur - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Interesting... So it seems that all the odd numbers need to be equal?

Geoff Pilling - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Geoff Pilling This then satisfies the condition for i = k + 1 , j = k i=k+1, j=k , but if you write the first few terms down, you see that it doesn't work for i = k + 2 , j = k i=k+2, j=k .

Henry U - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Henry U If you plug in i = k + 2 n , n N i=k+2n, n \in \mathbb{N} and j = k j=k , the equation becomes

a k + 2 n + a k = a 2 n = 0 a_{k+2n}+a_k=a_{2n}=0 .

This means that terms whose indices differ by an even number, so also terms with odd index, have to add up to 0.

We can combine this with the fact that all odd-indexed terms have to be equal to conclude that the only such sequence is actually the zero sequence.

Henry U - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Henry U Ah... Very nice!

Geoff Pilling - 2 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...