∫
−
∞
∞
x
(
e
2
x
+
1
)
(
e
x
+
1
)
e
2
x
−
e
x
d
x
The integral above has a closed form. Find this closed form.
Give your answer to 3 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Superb solution, I must say.
Could you please explain what happens to the x and 1+ exp(x) in the denominator on differentiating wrt a. Thanks
can anyone tell me why the answer is not 0. if we break up the given integral into two partial fractions and then in one of them put 2x=t, then i think it will come to 0.
Log in to reply
Do you mean setting the numerator as such ( e 2 x + 1 ) − ( e x + 1 ) then splitting them? Then both the integrals will be divergent. Which means ∞ − ∞ is not a valid step.
Log in to reply
That's the reason for my title. I was contemplating "I tried partial fractions and you shouldn't", but that would be too obvious.
Do you know of any other approaches to solve this? Jatin's solution is the only one that I know of.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – My method is not as elegant as Jatin's.
I observed that given integrand is even so we have to evaluate the following:
I = 2 ∫ 0 ∞ x ( 1 + e x ) ( 1 + e 2 x ) e 2 x − e x d x
⇒ I = 2 ∫ 0 ∞ x 1 ( 1 + e x 1 − 1 + e 2 x 1 ) d x
I then used the following series expansions:
1 + e x 1 = 1 + e − x e − x = e − x k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k e − k x = k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k e − ( k + 1 ) x
1 + e 2 x 1 = k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k e − 2 x ( k + 1 )
to obtain the following:
I = 2 ∫ 0 ∞ x 1 ( k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k e − x ( k + 1 ) − k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k e − 2 x ( k + 1 ) ) d x
⇒ I = 2 k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k ∫ 0 ∞ x e − x ( k + 1 ) − e − 2 x ( k + 1 ) d x
Use the substitution x ( k + 1 ) = t to get:
I = 2 k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k ∫ 0 ∞ t e − t − e − 2 t d t = 2 ln 2 k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k
The sum is divergent. Sometime ago, Tunk mentioned about Grandi's series here: Another series expansion trouble?? . Using that (luckily) gave the right answer.
Yes , you are true. I did the same mistake in my first attempt to Nice integral . That one is quite a similar problem, as if you put ln ( x + 1 ) = t , you get it converted to ∫ 1 ∞ t e 3 t − e t dt
yaa..even i am also getting 0!
This is awesome! After putting t=exp(ax), is it vague for me that it became 1/a. How come? Can someone explain to me? Thank you very much.
Log in to reply
Sure. e a x = t ⇒ a e a x d x = d t .
Hence, the integral changes to ∫ 0 ∞ a 1 ( 1 + t ) 2 d t = a 1
Nice solution at all. I also tried but done a simple mistake..
Nice solution, except you didn't prove that derivating under the integral was possible.
here what about e power x
Denote the considered integral as I , then by using partial fraction decomposition, the integral can be rewritten as I = ∫ − ∞ ∞ x 1 ( e 2 x + 1 e 2 x − e x + 1 e x ) d x From this, we can immediately see that the integrand is even function. Therefore I = ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 ( e 2 x + 1 e 2 x − e x + 1 e x ) d x Now, one can use Frullani's theorem by taking f ( x ) = e x + 1 e x , a = 2 , and b = 1 . Hence, I is simply equal to l n 2 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider I ( a ) = ∫ − ∞ ∞ x ( e x + 1 ) ( e a x + 1 ) e a x − e x d x
Differentiate with respect to a to get:
d a d ( I ( a ) ) = ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( e a x + 1 ) 2 e a x d x
Putting e a x = t , and solving, we get
d a d ( I ( a ) ) = a 1
Integrating, we get
I ( a ) = ln a + c
As I ( 1 ) = 0 , c = 0 , ⇒ I ( a ) = ln a
We have to find I ( 2 ) . Hence, answer is ln 2 = 0 . 6 9 3