We know that, lo g ( x y z ) = lo g ( x ) + lo g ( y ) + lo g ( z )
But it's not true for, lo g ( x y z ) = lo g ( x + y + z )
However, for some values of x , y and z the false property above is true.
If, − 1 0 ≤ x , y , z ≤ 1 0 and x , y , z are integers, then find the total number of ordered triples ( x , y , z ) for which the equation above is true.
Note: The domain of the lo g function is positive reals.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
nice solution. did the same way
You have not mentioned the Range of the function. Negative logarithms are defined, they just do not come in the set of real numbers.
l o g ( a ) = l o g ( b ) ⇒ a = b regardless of the value of a and b , only difference it would make is that l o g ( a ) , l o g ( b ) ∈ C
Log in to reply
Your interpretation is only true for complex logarithm. And, if the question was about complex logarithm, it would have been mentioned clearly.
Log in to reply
If you mean l o g ( z ) where z is a complex number, it's not the same as a negative logarithm. I mistyped the last sentence earlier.
Log in to reply
@Vishnu Bhagyanath – And if you mean negative logarithm isn't a part of complex logarithm, then I think you are doing a big mistake.
Log in to reply
@Md Omur Faruque – Did I say it wasn't? Did you mention in the question that R a n ( l o g ( x ) ) = R ?
Log in to reply
@Vishnu Bhagyanath – You mean why I didn't mention that it isn't complex logarithm.
Well, I didn't need to. When we see lo g x , we take it as principal logarithm. And it's range is R .
Log in to reply
@Md Omur Faruque – I don't see the harm in mentioning it :)
Log in to reply
@Vishnu Bhagyanath – Oh, you too! I also didn't see the harm in not mentioning it ;)
From inspection we find that the identity xyz=x+y+z is only true for positive integers 1, 2 and 3. The identity doesn't hold for any other combination in the given interval. So the total number of ordered triplets is 3!=6
From inspection you can only say that, x y z > 0 .
You can say neither they are all positive nor they are all integers .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
l o g ( x y z ) = l o g ( x + y + z ) log x is only defined when x>0 . So, we can rewrite the equation as, x + y + z = x y z − − − − ( i ) Only if, x y z > 0 .
For the i n e q u a l i t y to be true, there can be two possible cases,
Case 1: x , y , z > 0
Let's assume, x ≤ y ≤ z ⇒ x + y + z ≤ 3 z ⇒ x y z ≤ 3 z ⇒ x y ≤ 3 So, we get only 3 possible integer pairs of ( x , y ) : ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 1 , 3 ) Putting these values in equation (i) , we get only one possible integer triple, ( x , y , z ) = ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) Now, if we take out the condition of x ≤ y ≤ z , the total number of triples we get is, 3 ! = 6
Case 2: Any 2 of the 3 variables is negative and the other one is positive.
Let's assume x ≤ y < 0 < z .
Then, x + y < z ⇒ x y z − z < z ⇒ x y z < 2 z ⇒ x y < 2
This time we get 2 possible integer pairs of ( x , y ) : ( − 1 , − 1 ) , ( − 2 , − 1 ) But none of the pairs gives a positive integer value of z, when we put them in equation (i) .
Thus, the total number of ordered triples is 6 .