Don't wet the block

A cubical block of wood of edge 3 3 c m cm floats in water. The lower surface of the cube just touches the free end of a vertical spring fixed at the bottom of the pot. Find the maximum weight that can be put on the block without wetting it.

Given: Density of wood = 800 = 800 k g m 3 kgm^{-3} , density of water = 1000 = 1000 k g m 3 kgm^{-3} and spring constant of the spring = 25 = 25 N / m N/m . Take g = 10 g = 10 m s 2 ms^{-2} .

0.64 0.10 0.20 0.35

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

The specific gravity of the block = = 800 1000 \frac{800}{1000} = = 0.8 0.8 . Hence, the height inside water = = 3 3 cm × \times 0.8 0.8 = = 2.4 2.4 cm and the height outside water = = 3 3 cm - 2.4 2.4 cm = = 0.6 0.6 cm

Suppose the maximum weight that can be put without wetting the block is W W . The block in this case is completely immersed in the water. The volume of the displaced water = = volume of the block = = 27 × 1 0 6 27 \times 10^{-6} m 3 m^{3}

Hence, the force of buoyancy = = 27 × 1 0 6 × 1000 × 10 27 \times 10^{-6} \times 1000 \times 10 = = 0.27 0.27 N

The spring is compressed by 0.6 0.6 cm and hence the upward force exerted by the spring = = 0.25 × 0.6 0.25 \times 0.6 = = 0.15 0.15 N.

The force of buoyancy and the spring force taken together balance the weight of the block plus the weight W W put on the block.

The weight of the block is W b W_{b} = = 27 × 1 0 6 × 800 × 10 = 0.216 27 \times 10^{-6} \times 800 \times 10 = 0.216 N \approx 0.22 0.22 N

Thus, W W = = 0.27 0.27 N + + 0.15 0.15 N - 0.22 0.22 N = = 0.20 \boxed{0.20} N

My answer coming was W=0.204. Is it anyway correct? As i inserted the nearest answer ;)

Md Zuhair - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

You must have not approximated the weight of the block to its significant digits, but it is okay. This is an option question, not an input question. Next time learn about significant digits before commenting like a smartass. So for those who must have forgotten about significant digits like they don't matter, I have now shown how 0.22 N was obtained.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Sorry Maam. I just asked if i was correct or my answer just came(which means wrong)

Md Zuhair - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Md Zuhair Of course, it is right.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Thanks Maam. I will look forward as to not be a "smartass" :P

Md Zuhair - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Md Zuhair Please do not interact with me next time.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...