For a positive real number r , let M ( r ) be the largest possible value of F ( x , y , z ) = x 2 + y z 3 over all ordered triples of non-negative real numbers ( x , y , z ) , such that x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = r .
There is a value of r , denoted by r ∗ , such that F ( x , y , z ) = M ( r ∗ ) for two different triples ( x , y , z ) which satisfy x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = r ∗ . If r ∗ = b a where a and b are coprime positive integers, what is a + b ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Woah--What are lagrange multipliers?
Log in to reply
Is there any simpler way to do the problem?
Log in to reply
Lagrange multipliers are a method for extremizing a function F ( x , y , . . . ) of several variables subject to a constraint G ( x , y , . . . ) = 0 . You obtain the extrema by solving ∇ F − λ ∇ G = 0 G = 0 for some constant λ . You could do this another way by "parametrizing the constraint". In this case you could write x y z = = = r 4 1 cos θ r 4 1 sin θ cos ϕ r 4 1 sin θ sin ϕ in which case θ can vary freely between 0 and π , and ϕ can vary freely between 0 and 2 π . Then F is equal to F = r 2 1 cos 2 θ + r sin 4 θ cos ϕ sin 3 ϕ and we could successively maximize this with respect to ϕ and θ . There won't be a massive saving of labour, though.
There are non-calculus approaches.
HInt: If you fix x , what is the maximum value of F ( x , y , z ) (in terms of x )?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – This is just the same as doing the ϕ maximization. The only difference is that you get your answer in terms of x , not θ .
Why is the above requirement?
Log in to reply
We have three positive extrema for general r , each obtainable in one way. These are r 2 1 , 1 6 3 3 r and r 2 1 − 3 3 4 . If the global maximum is to be achieved in two different ways, two of these extrema must be the same. Hence the requirement that the first two must be equal for r ⋆ , since the third extremum is clearly smaller than the first.
First let R = y 2 + z 2 = r − x 2 , which ranges from 0 to r . We'll find the largest value of F ( x , y , z ) = x 2 + y z 3 = r − R + y z 3 for a fixed R > 0 . The key here is to maximize the function g ( θ ) = cos θ sin 3 θ with domain [ 0 , π / 2 ] . We note that g ′ ( θ ) is
3 cos 2 θ sin 2 θ − sin 4 θ = sin 2 θ ( 3 cos 2 θ − sin 2 θ ) = sin 2 θ ( 4 cos 2 θ − 1 ) .
Also note that at the endpoints, g ( 0 ) = 0 = g ( π / 2 ) , and the only other critical point is θ = π / 3 . Hence g has a unique maximum, g ( π / 3 ) = ( 2 1 ) ( 2 3 ) 3 = 1 6 3 3
From the above result it follows that, for a fixed R ≥ 0 , the largest value of F ( x , y , z ) = x 2 + y z 3 = r − R + y z 3 is:
m ( R ) = r − R + 1 6 3 R 2 3 .
(Note that this is trivial for R = 0 .) Since m ( R ) is an upward-concave parabola (as a function of R ) it achieves its maximum at one or both of the endpoints R = 0 , R = r . Therefore r = r ∗ if and only if m ( 0 ) = m ( r ) . Squaring both sides, this equation becomes r = ( 1 6 3 r 3 ) 2 and since r = 0 this means that r ∗ = 2 7 2 5 6 .
How can we substitute y and z with the trigo functions? What it this methid called?
Log in to reply
@Abhimanyu Swami,
I didn't say so explicitly, but yes that is what's happening in the first part: substituting R cos θ for y and R sin θ for z .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Using Lagrange multipliers, we need to solve the equation ⎝ ⎛ 2 x z 3 3 y z 2 ⎠ ⎞ − λ ⎝ ⎛ 2 x 2 y 2 z ⎠ ⎞ = ⎝ ⎛ 0 0 0 ⎠ ⎞ and so 2 x ( 1 − λ ) = z 3 − 2 λ y = z ( 3 y z − 2 λ ) = 0
If z = 0 , then λ y = x ( 1 − λ ) = 0 . If λ = 0 then x = 0 and y = r 4 1 , and the matching extremal value of F is 0 . If λ = 0 then y = 0 , so that x = r 4 1 and λ = 1 , and the matching extremal value of F is r 2 1 .
If z = 0 then λ = 2 3 y z and x ( 2 − 3 y z ) = z ( z 2 − 3 y 2 ) = 0 . Thus z 2 = 3 y 2 , so z = y 3 , so x ( 2 − 3 3 y 2 ) = 0 . If x = 0 then y = 2 1 r 4 1 and z = 2 3 r 4 1 , and the matching extremal value of F is 1 6 3 3 r . If x = 0 then y = 3 3 2 z = 3 2 and hence x 2 = r 2 1 − 3 3 8 The matching extremal value of F is r 2 1 − 3 3 4 which is smaller than r 2 1 .
Thus r ⋆ is identified by the requirement that ( r ⋆ ) 2 1 = 1 6 3 3 r ⋆ , which implies that r ⋆ = 2 7 2 5 6 . The required answer is 2 5 6 + 2 7 = 2 8 3 .