∫ 0 1 ln ( ln ( u 1 ) ) d u .
What is the value of
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Ψ ( 1 )
Great solution! I liked how you proved that Γ ′ ( 1 ) = − γ .
You are correct, but it was sort of confusing for me at set x = n t . I think it is more obvious (for the reader) if you let t = 1 − n x . That way, you don't have to wrap your head around the transformed limits a=0 and b=1. Also, it leads directly to the integral ∫ 0 1 t n l n ( 1 − t ) d t so you don't need to make another substitution y = 1 − t .
@Steven Zheng I didn't give it much attention. After all, it is a well known fact.
Log in to reply
You mentioned "Tell me what do you like about math and I'll tell you who you are." on your homepage. If I like geometry and number theory, what type of person would I be?
Log in to reply
@Steven Zheng Someone who likes nature and admires beauty, and attempts to finds patterns and symmetry in everyday life.
That's may not be accurate.
Log in to reply
@Haroun Meghaichi – Wow. That's accurate. I'm not kidding!
Integrating by parts with x = ln ( − ln ( u ) ) , d v = d u
= > d x = u ln u 1 d u , v = u
\displaystyle => I= \int_0^1 \mathrm \ln (-\ln u) \mathrm{d}u = \left. u\ln (-\ln u) \right|_0^1 - \int_0^1 \mathrm{ \frac{1}{\ln u} }\mathrm{d}u
Solving the second integral, let u = e − t , d u = − e − t d t
= > ∫ 0 1 ln u 1 d u = ∫ ∞ 0 t e − t d t = − ∫ 0 ∞ t e − t d t
Note the definition of the exponential integral: − ∫ − x ∞ t e − t d t = E i ( x )
< = > ∫ 0 1 ln u 1 d u = − ∫ 0 ∞ t e − t d t = x → 0 lim E i ( x )
Hence, I = u ln ( − ln u ) ∣ 0 1 − x → 0 lim E i ( x )
we have: u ln ( − ln u ) ∣ 0 1 = u → 1 lim u ln ( − ln u ) − u → 0 lim u ln ( − ln u )
by direct substitution, u → 0 lim u ln ( − ln u ) = u → 0 lim u 1 ln ( − ln u ) = ∞ ∞
so using L'Hopital rule : u → 0 lim u 1 ln ( − ln u ) = u → 0 lim − u 2 1 u ln u 1 = u → 0 lim − ln u u = 0
now we are left with I = u → 1 lim u ln ( − ln u ) − x → 0 lim E i ( x ) . With direct substitution, I = − ∞ + ∞ , an indetermined form.
But I = u → 1 lim u ln ( − ln u ) − x → 0 lim E i ( x ) = u → 1 lim ln ( − ln u ) − x → 0 lim E i ( x )
= x → 0 lim ln ( x ) − x → 0 lim E i ( x ) (substitution x = − ln u )
= x → 0 lim ( ln ( x ) − E i ( x ) )
Note that E i ( x ) = γ + ln x + k = 1 ∑ ∞ k k ! x k
= > I = x → 0 lim ( ln ( x ) − E i ( x ) ) = x → 0 lim ( − γ − k = 1 ∑ ∞ k k ! x k )
The terms of the sum are all zero for x = 0 , therefore:
I = − γ
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Set u = e − t then the integral becomes : ∫ 0 ∞ e − t ln t d t = d x d ( Γ ( x ) ) ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x = 1 = − γ A Proof that Γ ′ ( 1 ) = − γ : This proof can be found in many real analysis books.
Using dominated convergence theorem we can note that : ∫ 0 ∞ e − x ln x d x = n → ∞ lim ∫ 0 n ( 1 − n x ) n ln x d x Set x = n t you'll get n → ∞ lim n ∫ 0 1 ln n ( 1 − t ) n + ( 1 − t ) n ln t d t = n → ∞ lim n + 1 n ln n + n ∫ 0 1 ln t ( 1 − t ) n d t The latter integral can be evaluate by y = 1 − t and then by parts easily : ∫ 0 1 y n ln ( 1 − y ) d y = n + 1 − 1 ∫ 0 1 y − 1 y n + 1 − 1 d y = n + 1 − H n + 1 The last equality follows from the geometric sequence sum, then Γ ′ ( 1 ) = n + 1 n ( ln n − H n + 1 ) = − γ .