2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 3 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 = ?
Don't use a calculator!
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I didn't use any kind of formula... 4x4=16 3x5=15 so there would be one left because the only numbers that changes are the last ones...
Log in to reply
But, fundamentally, it is the formula which you applied
Hehe, I did the same. Same reasoning . We are geniuses!!!!!!
The fact that 4x4 - 3x5 = 1 does not prove that the question is equal to 1.
Log in to reply
No, it doesn't prove it. But combine this with 5x5 - 4x6 = 1 and 6x6 - 5x7 = 1 etc etc, which strongly indicates it with a pattern with no obvious exceptions. And on a timed problem, that's an excellent method. (Although an algebraic proof is more intellectually and academically satisfying when you are not constrained by time.)
I like the solution and its simplicity but what about a mathematical proof/calculation to get there?
Hey, I too did the same.
That's what I did
See, 20142014 is not equals to 2014*2014. Because if you'll solve it that way then your answer will be something else. Here 20142014 is a no. of 8-digits.
I'm sorry but there is a flaw in your logic. (2014)(2014)-1 doesn't equal (2014)(2013). For this substitution to be correct it would have to look like this : a^2 - (a-2014)(a+2014). When you factor this out you get 2014^2 which = 4056196. If you intended the numbers to be 20142014 not (2014 2014) you should not have put them in separate colors to imply multiplication. That would be like giving this equation in the form aa aa-ab*ac and then saying that a is not a common factor.
Log in to reply
I think you misunderstood the question. I did the same thing initially, then realised that we are looking at the number 20142014, ie. 20,142,014. Not 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 . Separate colours do not imply multiplication. Where did you get that notion? The colours were to emphasise 2013, 2014, 2015 as years. Your example of aa·aa-ab·ac is different because we're looking at algebraic letters.
Log in to reply
That makes so much more sense now!
Sure, I think the problem somehow "hints" that it is a multiplication, where it isn't. Thus, it is kind of unclear.
The colours made it more confusing because some people thought it implied multiplication between the 2 different coloured numbers.
I Had same confusion like u
Are you really 13 years old?
Find the square of 1000000005 without manual multiplication
Log in to reply
(100000000+5)^2= 10000000000000000 +1000000000+25 =10000000100000025
1000000010000000025
(100000000*100000001).25
Log in to reply
i really didn't get how to solve the above question!!!
1000000010000000025
If you use small numbers, you will get 1. But if i use a number with 7 or more digits it gives me 0. The cause could be, the square of a big number is bigger, with 13 or greater power. So the calculator may not be able to minus those two big numbers and giving us 0 because those are quite close big numbers. (may be, but unlikely, but reality)
Log in to reply
Actually, the calculator you are using is rounding the number if it's very big. Like 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 to 1 0 1 2 or 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 So if both numbers are rounded to same number their difference would always be 0, whether their actual difference is 1 or 1000
I TOO SOLVED IN THE SAME METHOD
At first I had 1 as the answer, but the different colours employed threw me off; and I came up with 2014.
Your answer is wrong.
Log in to reply
It would be more constructive to tell him why his answer is wrong than just tell it!
that's amazing thanx for the solution
That can't be right... Let x = 2014. Would end up with x^2 at the end.
(x^2)(x^2) - [x(x-1)][x(x+1)] x^4 - (x^2 - x)(x^2 + x) x^4 - (x^4 +x^3 - x^3 - x^2) x^4 - (x^4 - x^2) x^2
Please check your answer
Log in to reply
There is no x(x-1). It's 20142013, not 2014*2013
hahah the same mistake i fall in
same method :)
I did it exactly the same way as Mr Victor.
i think applying vedic maths here would be d best approach! It's fast n easy and accurate too..
brilliant guy
I also solved this by applying the same identity...
Good solution!
That's just what I did. I used x though!
Good approach
masterclass
wowww.........!
Awsomeeee!!!!!1
this solution was so simple and easy to follow thank you :) and however while I do understand this, how come when you put this question into a calculator the answer is 0? perhaps this is a stupid question but I'm very confused and would be very glad if someone could help me with this.
Same method. :)
the above solution is ok but solving through calculator the answer came out as 0, (zero), why?
Log in to reply
but my answer with a calculator is coming 1. you must have done some mistake
Log in to reply
I do not thinks so since this is a trick question. If your calculator doesn't have enough digit processing power, it will get zero as an answer. Intuitively, you know this is wrong. Even * even = even, and odd * odd=odd. Therefore, the answer must be odd. Zero is not odd.
always use BODMAS rule that is firstly division , multiplication......
i m also getting zero, i have checked the values but by calculator it shows only...do u get where are the mistake take place???
You must have made a mistake somewhere.
Log in to reply
can you please explain me... 20142014 20142014 = 4.05700728 10^14 20142013 20142015 = 4.05700728 10^14 when we subtract these two terms, how could 1 come.
Log in to reply
@Abhishek Harit – Since the number is so large the calculator has to round it. The work is right. Use smaller numbers or variables to represent the larger numbers
@Abhishek Harit – Not for those guys who try to by heard thing rather tha using a simple logic
Log in to reply
@Hashim Shaikg – Your calculator probably went overflow
Log in to reply
@Fabio Gama – Intuitively, you know zero is wrong. Even * even = even, and odd * odd=odd. Therefore, the answer must be odd. Zero is not odd.
no by calculator also the ans came was 1
devansh sharma is correct
My answer using the calculator of computer was 1.
Log in to reply
This is a trick question. If your calculator doesn't have enough digit processing power, it will get zero as an answer.
Intuitively, you know this is wrong. Even * even = even, and odd * odd=odd. Therefore, the answer must be odd. Zero is not odd.
DISTRIBUTIVE :)
i too solved in same method
same approach here...
Dx I forgot to distribute haha
hand held calculators have a six or seven decimal precision the others are rounded off. So the two very large numbers would appear as identical - using better calculators (wincal) with higher precision should allow you to get 1
0 - (20142013x20142015) = -405700727976195
when done with a calculator,answer is 0
Log in to reply
This is a trick question. If your calculator doesn't have enough digit processing power, it will get zero as an answer.
Intuitively, you know this is wrong. Even * even = even, and odd * odd=odd. Therefore, the answer must be odd. Zero is not odd.
nice solution …. just awesome … thanks man...
So cutely calculated! I worked it manually and got the same result. But it was laborious.
nice problem ever
In the age of 13; such a brilliant brain
2014x2013=2014x2014 -1???????
Log in to reply
20142013 chứ không phải 2014x2013, nó 2 tô màu làm làm cho ta nhầm tưởng đó là 2 số nhân nhau
Is the problem 20142014^2 - 2013 2014 * 2014 2014 ?
Just for verification check this on calculator and see what are we getting is it 0
exactly dude!!!!!!! yeah
Even I did the same thing.
If you take out 20140000 as a common factor than you get 20140000(2014^2-2013×2015). The total inside the brackets are zero, so the entire product is zero. Sorry if my simple mind is outlooking something here or if I have made a mistake but please explain my error. Thanks.
বুঝি নাই....
Mine is -(2014-2013) (2014-2015) =(-1) (-1) =1 Not sure if its only coincidence ;-)
How can I easily understand the Algebraic and Rational Expression can you help me?????????
Log in to reply
Check out the Algebra Practice section. There's lots of good problems there, be it easy or hard. Each problem comes with a detailed solution too. Alternatively you can check out Calvin or Arron's sets on Algebra. They're really useful.
Haha I had this all written out to submit as a solution, and saw it was identical to yours. Great minds think alike. ;)
it was nice problem . I couldn't get it that how to solve it.
WRONG. Here is the answer: 2014x2014x2014x2014 - 2014x2013x2014x2015 (for 2014=a) = (a^4) - (a^2) x [(a-1)(a+1)] = (a^4) - (a^2) x [a^2 + a - a - 1] = (a^4) - (a^4) + (a^2) = (a^2) = (2014^2) = 4056196
Log in to reply
It's because of the different colours used for the two parts of the same no that you've got this answer . actually, the question is 20142014×20142014 - 20142013×20142015
I totally agree. The answer would be 1 if you divide all the number by 2014 before you solve.
Factor out a 2014 to get 2014 (2014^2- 20132015) which reduces to 2014 (1) thus 2014 is the answer
Nice I did it in the same way..
seems like a miracle. if we apply this trick, the answer is 1. but if we're going to apply MDAS and apply some tricks, we can simply get 0 as the answer. 20142014x20142014 is the same as with a^2. We subtract this with 20142013x20142015 which is the same with 20142014x20142014 . by subtracting 20142015 by 1, and adding 1 to 20142013., the factors become both 201 42014, or 20142014^2. which is also a^2. a^2-a^2=0.
Your's logic is correct but practically it is wrong. If you want to prove your logic then question was complete with it is not equal to zero, then your logic is correct
There’s a misunderstanding happen here. You have to show the expression clearer, because it seem like 20,142,014 more than 2014x2014. However this problem is so beautiful, and I like it.
But in number 20142014 two number is there. 2014 is written in different colour so I think the correct answer is 2014. 20142014 × 20142014 -20142013 × 20142015
So we can take 2014 common out
2014(2014 × 2014 -2013 × 2015) 2014(4056196-4056195) 2014(1) =2014
let 20142014 be x , so, x = 20142014 ; x - 1 = 20142013 and x + 1 = 20142015 therefore, A.T.Q x 2 − ( x − 1 ) ( x + 1 ) = x 2 − x 2 = 0
Log in to reply
bro,thts =1 not 0
No.
The problem, as written in the original dialogue: 20142014 * 20142014 - 20142013 * 20142014 = ? let A = 20142014. Then: A^2 - (A-1)*A Then A^2 - A^2 + A = A
Just replace 20142014 with a smaller number, say "6"...The result will always be 6, in that example.
x^2 - (x-1)(x+1) = x^2 - (x^2 - 1) = x^2 - x^2 +1 = 1
i think 4.4 - 3.5 = 1
Log in to reply
nope that's 0.9
yeah...same here :)
Just assume that 2014 =2 2013 = 1 and 2015 = 3 there we go : 2 x 2 - 1 x 3
Disregard the first seven digits. Use only the last digits. (4x4)-(3x5). 16-15=1.
Correct, because you multiply the first seven digits and then subtract that same number, they would cancel out leading to the above.
This is what I did as well seemed easy enough
thats what I did
Dang very cool!
2 0 1 4 2 − ( 2 0 1 4 − 1 ) ( 2 0 1 4 + 1 )
= 2 0 1 4 2 − ( 2 0 1 4 2 − 1 )
= 2 0 1 4 2 − 2 0 1 4 2 + 1
= 1
I tried to do something like this.
it's not 2014 its 20142014
But then you're multiplying 2014^2 power by 2014 so the final answer should be 2014(1).
It would be (20142014-1)
Let X=20142014 then According to Question, x^2-(x-1)(x+1)=x^2-(x^2-1) =x^2-x^2+1 = 1 ans.
Let x = 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4
Then the problem becomes x 2 − ( x − 1 ) ( x + 1 ) = x 2 − ( x 2 − 1 2 ) = x 2 − x 2 + 1 = 1
=20142014^2 -( 20142014-1) x (20142014+1) ; // As (a-b)x(a+b) = a^2-b^2 ; = 20142014^2 - (20142014^2 - 1^2 ) ; = 1 ;
Way too complicated my dude
Let x =20142014, Then The above eq. is: = x × x − ( x − 1 ) × ( x + 1 ) A s ( a + b ) ( a − b ) = ( a 2 − b 2 ) ∴ ( x − 1 ) ( x + 1 ) = ( x 2 − 1 ) = x 2 − ( x 2 − 1 ) = x 2 − x 2 + 1 = 1
It's really really easy ^^ nearly the same as Victor Loh but maybe some don't understand so let's make it clear *but a bit longer :( * .
20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142015
= (20142014)^ 2 - (20142014 - 1) x (20142014 + 1)
= (20142014) ^ 2 - [ (20142014) ^ 2 - 1]
= 0 - (-1) = 1
We also have another way to solve this, no expanding or factoring formulas required :)
20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142015
= 20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x (20142014 + 1)
= 20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142014 - 20142013
= 20142014 x ( 20142014 - 20142013) - 20142013
= 20142014 - 20142013 = 1
That's all :) Have a nice weekend :)
Smart @ age of 16
Victor saved a lot of time by letting a=20142014 !
I defined x=2014
X(2014) * X(2014) which would be X^4
X^4 - x(X-1) * x(X+1) X^4 - X^4 = 1
The problem is invariably wrong. It should have a^2-(a-1)(a+1) in which case the figures should have appeared as (20142014 20142014) - (20142013 20142015). Here we are given the problem as a^2-(a-1)a in which the answer comes as "a" itself always. The answer to (20142014 20142014)-(20142013 20142014) evaluates to 20142014 itself.
Thanks, Siddhartha
No your solution is incorrect the correct answer is 1
Was the question originally posed with an error? I've seen a few comments talking about "20142014·20142014 - 20142013·20142014"
its simple take 20142013 on the right side then take anyone of the 20142014 and divide it u will be left with jst 20142014 and 20142013 on both sides subtact them and theres ur answer
Beauty is in simplicity!Good job!
we have given 20142014^2= x^2, and 20142013*20142015= (x-1)(x+1) so that why, Let's considered x^2-(x-1)(x+1) therefore x^2-1^2=(x-1)(x+1) =x^2-(x^2-1^2) =x^2-x^2+1 =1
Since every time 2 of the same numbers are multipled together, for example 4x4 which is 16. And every time the numbers is one less and one more, the answer is one less, like 5x3 which is 15 which is one less than 16. Another example could be 7x7 makes 49, and 6x8 makes 48. Or 10x10 makes 100 and 11x9 makes 99. So for this question it is 2014x2014-2015x2013 (this is when you simplify it) which we know equals one, even when we dont know the answer for 2014x2014 or 2015x2013.
x=20142014
x²-{(x-1)(x+1)} =x²-(x²-1²) =1
Consider 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 = a Then, 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 3 = a − 1 and 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 = a + 1 So, we have 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 = a 2 And 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 3 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 = ( a − 1 ) ( a + 1 ) = a 2 − 1 So, we have a 2 − ( a 2 − 1 ) = ( a 2 − a 2 ) + 1 = 1
I did the easier way: the numbers are almost the same: 20142014-20142014-20142013 -20142015 just the last digit has changed so... I forgot the whole number and keep just the last digit and did it 2014201(4)x2014201(4)-2014201(3)x2014201(5) then.. 4x4-3x5 16-15 = 1
hahhahahah
Let 20142014 = x - 1
Thus 20142013 = x - 2
And 20142015 = x
So,
=(x-1)^2 - ((x-2)*x)
=x^2 -2x +1 -x^2 + 2x
=1
Alright, let's see what we've got!: 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 3 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5
Let us first re-write 2013 & 2015 as ± 1 of 2014, as such: 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 1 ) × ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 + 1 ) 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 1 ) × ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 + 1 )
Now, we distribute the negative sign, to the one, as so: 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 + 1 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 + 1
Now, we just simplify, as such: 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 + 1
Now, we merely factor out the 2014, as so: ( 2 ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 ) − 2 ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 ) ) + 1
Now, we merely cancel out the 2014s, as both of them are 2 ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 ) , therefore leading us to: 1
Q ∙ E ∙ D
TIP: Oh, and one more thing, start using current dates, like 2016. 2014 was 2 years ago!
I must say that the answer is not right. Its simply 0. The last digit is useless as you take one and move to the other. You did there (a x a) - (b x c) but the fact is that (a x a) = (b x c).
Two close numbers multiplied have a trick, Average^2 - difference^2
If we apply this here we get: 20142014 * 20142014 - 20142013 * 20142015
20142014^2 - 20142014^2 -1^2 -1^2=1
20142014(20142014) - (20142014 + 1 )(20142013) = a(a) - (a+1)(b) = a(a) - a(b) - b =a(a-b) - b = (20142014)(20142014 - 20142013) - (20142013) =20142014 - 20142013 = 1
Simple. x^2 -(x^2 -1) = 1
Why would a single number ever be displayed as two different colors? The years to me have no significance in solving this equation other than if they were being multiplied by each other, seems like most other people commenting have the same thought process.
Just regards the last digits of every term which is 4x4-3x5=>16-15=1
20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142015 =
20142014 x 20142014 - (20142014-1) x (20142014+1) =
20142014 x 20142014 - (20142014 x 20142014 - 1 x 1) =
20142014^2 - 20142014^2 +1=
=1
Color formatting makes question unclear. I'd prefer if all 8 digits of a number one color instead of splitting it pink and blue . It implies multiplication at a glance. Had to work the problem both ways to check myself.
20142014 X 20142014 - 20142013 X 20142015 =(20142014)^2 - (20142014 - 1)(20142014 + 1) =(20142014)^2 - (20142014^2 - 1^2) =20142014^2 - 20142014^2 + 1^2 =1
I just used other numbers as an example.
3 * 3 - (3 - 1) * (3 + 1)
3² - 2 * 4
9 - 8
1
20142014 x 20142014 - (20142014-1) x (20142014+1)
20142014^2 - ( 20142014^2 - 1 )
20142014 - 20142014 + 1 = 1
=(20142014)^2 -[(20142014-1)(20142014+1) =(20142014)^2-[(20142014)^2 -1] =(20142014)^2 - (20142014)^2 +1 = 1
The solution by Victor Loh is very clear, but for people who want to deal with the numbers only, here is another form of the solution:
20142014 * 20141014 - 20142013 * 20142015 =20142014 * 20141014 + 20142015 - 20142014 * 20142015 (we add 20142015 to both terms) =20142014 * 20141014 + 20142015 - 20142014 - 20142014 * 20142014 (subtracting 20142014 from both sides) = 20142015 - 20142014 =1
Its very easy. You just need to multiply the last numbers i.e. 4×4 - 3×5=16-15=1.
20142013 = 20142014 - 1 and 20142015 = 20142014 + 1. Then: (20142014-1)×(20142014+1) = 20142014² - 1. 20142014² - (20142014²-1), will be 20142014² - 20142014² + 1; resulting in 1.
Yeah, I realised it while giving my last try
= ((2014201)^(2) * 4 * 4) - ((2014201)^(2) * 3 * 5) = 16 - 15 = 1
I looked at it and said screw that. Set 20142014 = 2
20132013 = 1
20152015 = 3
Then... 4-(1*3) = 1
We can simply minus LHS AND RHS. 2014-2014=0 2014-2014=0 2014-2013=1 2015-2014=1 and at last we will multiply answer 1×1=1
let 20142014 be x
now you will get the expression like this
a^2-(a-1)(a+1) a^2-(a^2-1)
a^2-a^2+1
1
The problem can be easily solved by breaking down numbers into simple variables: For example, we can assign 20142014 to be x. Rewriting the equation:
(x*x)-(x+1)(x-1). Notice how 20142013 is really just 20142014-1 or x-1. Same follows for 20142015. Simplifying the difference of squares gives us x^2-(x^2-1). The x^2's cancel out leaving -(-1), which is just 1.
I did not use a formula that I was aware of, I noticed that the numbers on each side of the minus were the same, and then looked closer to see that there was only 1 number difference ib the two numbers, and 1 times one is one. it was strictly observational intuition.
SUBTRACTING EACH NUMBER WITH 20142013... (20142014-20142013)X (20142014-20142013)-(20142013-20142013)X(20142015-20142013) = 1X1-0X2 = 1
2 0 1 4 2 − ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 1 ) ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 + 1 )
Since we already know the formula for difference in squares, which:
a 2 − b 2 = ( a − b ) ( a + b )
We can simplify the question even further:
2 0 1 4 2 − ( 2 0 1 4 2 − 1 2 )
Remove the bracket and you will have:
2 0 1 4 2 − 2 0 1 4 2 + 1
Evaluate and you will end up in the answer as:
1
Let x = 20142014
Then, 20142013 = ( x - 1 )
And , 20142015 = ( x + 1 )
So the given conditions become,
x^2 - ( x - 1)( x + 1 )
= x^2 - ( x^2 - 1 )
= x^2 - x^2 + 1
= 1
I simply worked with the differentials - the end digits - because, in any normal operation, the common factors would cancel each other. Hence: 4×4 -3×5 = 16-15 = 1.
very simple
just take x = 20142014
then x X x -(x-1)(x+1) =x^2 - (x^2-1^2) =x^2 - x^2 + 1 =1 . :) simple
Write a solution. x^2 -(x-1)(x+1) =x^2-((x^2)-1) =(x^2)-(x^2)+1 =1
20142014×20142014 - 20142013×20142015= 2014 (2014^2)- 2014 (2013x2015)= 2014^2 - 2013×2015= 1
Let 20142014 be x x^2-(x-1)(x+1) x^2-x^2-(-1) 1
Ur method is wrong and ans I'd also not one..... a=2014x2014 ...doesn't mean a-1=2014x2013......rather it's 2014x2014-1
it took me a while with the colors and all, but in the end I realized it was incredibly easy. by the way i never gnu that color meant factor, I'll have to keep that in mind
use the last digit 4x4-3x5
2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 − 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 3 × 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 = ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 + 4 ) ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 + 4 ) − ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 + 3 ) ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 + 5 ) = ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 2 + 8 ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 ) + 1 6 ) − ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 2 + 8 ( 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 ) + 1 5 ) = 1
Simple trick of squared numbers n^2 -1 = (N-1)(N+1) example 8x8=64, 7x9 =63, try with any square numbers
A^2-[(A-B)(A+B)]=A^2-[A^2-B^2]=A^2-A^2+B^2=B^2; here A=20142014 and B=1;
This problem seems difficult at first, though thinking of it differently can help.
For the equation:
20142014 * 20142014 - 20142013 * 20142015 = ?
think of the number 20142014 as a variable, in this case x therefore we get the equation:
X * X - ( X - 1 ) * ( X + 1 ) = ?
Solving we get:
X ^ 2 - (X ^ 2 - 1)
Distributing the -1 from in front of the parentheses:
X ^ 2 - X ^ 2 + 1
Subtracting the X ^ 2:
1
Use the last digit of all numbers, multiply and subtract
Ignore the redundant digits (2014201) to leave 4x4-3x5=1.
20142014^2 - (20142014-1)(20142014+1) = 20142014^2 - 20142014^2 - 20142014+20142014 +1 = 1
I disagree with the solution given of 1. Here is my reasoning. 2014x2014x2014x2014-2014x2013x2014x2015
Take out a common factor of 2014^2. 2014^2x(2014^2-2013x2015)
Now you have to do the calculations. Using algebra will not simplify the equation any more. (I've tried) The answer comes out as 4,056,196.
I've checked some of the other solutions mentioned and the algebra is flawed. If you still don't believe me then use a calculator to solve the equation from the start and you will see that the answer isn't 1 but 4,056,196. it is impossible to use algebra to find a different solution to an equation.
When it said 20142014 it is a number and not 2014*2014
Let 20142015 be y^3 Let 20142014 be y^2 let 20142013 be y Then 20142014 × 201402014 =20142013 × 20142015
Y^2 × y^2 = y × y^3 Y^4 = y^4
Then y^4/y^4 = 1
Is it right or wrong ?
What the hell! I had no idea how to do it. I casually put 1in the answer. Turned out right!!
X^2 - (X+1) (x-1)= X^2 - X^2-1= X^2-X^2 - - 1= 0- -1= +1
Multiplying the last digits we get 16 - 15 = 1 Ans
4 X 4=16 and 3 X 5=15 and other digits are same. So 1 is the answer.
let 20142014 be x. So the problem boils down to x^{2}-(x-1)*)(x+1) = x^{2}-[ x^{2}-1 ] = x^{2}-x^{2}+1 = 1
I found that any number times itself minus the product of the number minus one and the number plus one is always one. For example, (4X4)-(5X6) =1. Also, (6X6)-(5X7) is also 1. (100X100)-(99X101) is also 1. Therefore, the answer to this problem must be 1.
a squared - (a-1)(a+1)= always 1
The numbers are all the same except the last digit so I if you just pretend the rest of the numbers aren't there the problem looks like "4x4 - 3x5." 4x4=16 and 3x5=15 so I just did 16 -15= 1.
calculator is giving answer 0. what's wrong?
I just did this
4 ∗ 4 - 3 ∗ 5 =16-15=1
Your answer is wrong.
let 20142014 =a then the expression would look like
(a x a) - (a-1)(a+1) = a^{2} - a^{2} + a - a - 1 = -1
wrongly done a^2 - (a-1)(a+1)= a^2 - (a^2 - 1) = a^2 - a^2 +1 = 1
20142000 is same . I just took 14x14 - 13x15 = 196-195 =1
if you notice that its basically just the same multiplication problem on each side except for the one at the end. the answer is one.
=[20142014 +(20142013 20142014)]-[(20142013 20142014)+20142013] =20142014-20142013
in my opinion if we replace those big numbers by small ones as if we put 2 instead of 20142014 and put 1 instead of 20142013 and put 3 instead of 20142015 because it's the biggest number so if we normally calculate 2 2-1 3 it will be simply equal 1
All you have to do is 4 4-3 5=1!
i just multiplied last one digits and subtracted
20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142015
(20142013 + 1)(20142013 + 1) - 20142013(20142013 + 2)
20142013^2 + 2(20142013) + 1 - 20142013^2 - 2(20142013)
= 1
This is what I did 2x2-1x3
When I first looked at this question I thought of this:
20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142015
let 2014 be 1
(11 x 11) - (10 x 12) = 121 - 120 = 1
I know this is strange, but for a situation like this it works! Where (a*a) - (a-1)(a+1).
I do the same you did
I started with easier example like 4* 4= 16 , 3 5=15 6 6 =36 , 5*7 = 35 the difference each time is 1
simple matter, you do remove every 5 number.than last 1 number (4\times 4-3\times 5=1)={(4\times 4=16)-(3\times 5=15)=1}.....
= (20142013+1) (20142015-1) - (20142013* 20142015) = (20142013* 20142015)-20142013+ 20142015-1- (20142013* 20142015) =20142013+20142015-1 =1 Write a solution.
You could look at this the fast way and take the last digits of each of the numbers. You end up with
(4x4)-(5x3)
16-15
1
Simple :)
= (2014 * 2014) - (2013 * 2015)
= 4,056,196 - 4056195
= 1
U must look the same value and remove it both sides remain the others and start the operation given that's it no need to make a long term to solve a simple solution.
you see, we can see a pattern if we start from the whole numbers starting from 0. Like 1 times 3 is 3 and the square of 2 (the number in the middle) is one plus 3, equals to 4. Like 2 times 4 is 8, and the square of 3 (the number in the middle) is one plus 8, equals 9. 3x5 is 15 and square of 4 is 16. 4x6 is 24 and 5x5 is 25. 5x7=35, 6x6=36. . . . . . 99x101=9999, 100x100=10000
And you can see in our problem we are asked to substruct 20142013x20142015 from the square of the number in middle, 20142014! And if we take that our pattern will work, the answer would be 1. This is my simple solution. (Sorry if any linguistic mistakes have been done during the solution, I'm not a native.)
2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 2 -- (20142014-1) (20142014+1)
a 2 -- a 2 +1
1 : ans
what I have done is I disregarded the first six digit (201420), then used the calculator. So, 14 14 - 13 15 = 1
Let's say we accept your stupid kind of thinking, still 1414-1315 is not equal to 1.
I only used the last numbers (4 x 4) - (3 x 5) = 16 - 15 = 1
this is wrong ,how it can possible 1414-1315=1 ??????
really you didnt realize that he was doing the following 14x14-13x15=1. 196-195=1
20142014 x 20142014 - 20142013 x 20142015 = 20142014^2 - (20142014 - 1)(20142014 + 1) = 20142014^2 - (20142014^2 - 1) = 20142014^2 - 20142014^2 +1 = 1
let 20142014 x (x*x)-(x-1)(x+1) then x^2 - (x^2+x-x-1)=1
I just delete the same number positionned at the same position, on top and bottom..I got 4x4 - 3x5.. 16-15=1 :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
EDIT (Friday, November 13, 2015): 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 = 2 0 , 1 4 2 , 0 1 4 . 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 is not the same as 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 4 . I've also changed the colors.
Simple.
Let a = 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 . Then the given expression is equivalent to a 2 − ( a − 1 ) ( a + 1 ) = a 2 − ( a 2 − 1 ) = 1 and we are done.