A geometry problem by Chandrashekar Giridharan

Geometry Level 2

cos θ + cos ( θ + 1 ) + cos ( θ + 2 ) + + cos ( θ + 35 9 ) \cos \theta^\circ + \cos (\theta^\circ+1^\circ) + \cos (\theta^\circ+2^\circ) +\cdots + \cos (\theta^\circ+359^\circ)

What is the value of this expression when θ \theta is an integer?

A certain theta value is shown here, but theta can be any integer. Consider how the cosine changes as the angle increases. A certain theta value is shown here, but theta can be any integer. Consider how the cosine changes as the angle increases.

1 -1 0 0 1 2 \frac{1}{2} 1 1 Depends on the value of θ \theta

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

12 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Apr 30, 2018

Relevant wiki: Proving Trigonometric Identities - Basic

S = cos θ + cos ( θ + 1 ) + cos ( θ + 2 ) + + cos ( θ + 35 9 ) = k = 0 359 cos ( θ + k ) = k = 0 179 cos ( θ + k ) + k = 180 359 cos ( θ + k ) Note that cos ( 18 0 x ) = cos x = k = 0 179 cos ( θ + k ) k = 180 359 cos ( 18 0 ( θ + k ) ) = k = 0 179 cos ( θ + k ) k = 0 179 cos ( θ k ) Note that cos ( x ) = cos x = k = 0 179 cos ( θ + k ) k = 0 179 cos ( θ + k ) = 0 \begin{aligned} S & = \cos \theta^\circ + \cos (\theta^\circ + 1^\circ) + \cos (\theta^\circ + 2^\circ) + \cdots + \cos (\theta^\circ + 359^\circ) \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^{359} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^{179} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) \color{#3D99F6} + \sum_{k=180}^{359} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{Note that }\cos (180^\circ - x) = - \cos x \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^{179} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) \color{#3D99F6} - \sum_{k=180}^{359} \cos (180^\circ - (\theta^\circ + k^\circ)) \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^{179} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) - \sum_{k=0}^{179} \color{#3D99F6} \cos (- \theta^\circ - k^\circ) & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{Note that }\cos (- x) = \cos x \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^{179} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) - \sum_{k=0}^{179} \color{#3D99F6} \cos (\theta^\circ + k^\circ) \\ & = \boxed{0} \end{aligned}

Have you used the fact that theta is an integer?

Tanmay Devale - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

θ \theta doesn’t have to be an integer. This expression is always equal to zero for any real value of θ \theta

Log in to reply

Yup I got that from the proof but then why is that specified in the question at all?

Tanmay Devale - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Tanmay Devale I guess it makes the problem easier, as therefore θ \theta can be removed as soon as the first line : cos ( 360 + θ ) = cos ( θ ) \cos(360 + \theta) = \cos(\theta) . If θ \theta is an integer, the sum is directly k = 0 359 cos ( k ) \sum_{k=0}^{359} \cos(k) .

Thomas Lesgourgues - 3 years ago

I can't understand your solution

Trang Trần - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

You have to learn up summation k = a b \displaystyle \sum_{k=a}^b .

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years ago

Does theta need to be an integer? It can be any real value, right?

Vighnesh Raut - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Not necessary an integer.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years ago

Can be written as integral from theta to theta plus five fifty nine of the function cos theta approximately

Sukhendu Roy - 3 years ago

Not sure how you got to step 5: cos(-theta° - k°)

Titus Davis - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Why isn't it cos(theta°+ k°)? And why do we change the interval to k=0, 179?

Titus Davis - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

k = 180 359 cos ( 18 0 ( θ + k ) ) = cos ( θ ) k = 180 + cos ( θ 1 ) k = 181 + cos ( θ 2 ) k = 182 + + cos ( θ 17 9 ) k = 359 = k = 0 179 cos ( θ k ) \begin{aligned} \sum_{k=180}^{359} \cos(180^\circ -(\theta^\circ + k^\circ)) & = \underbrace{\cos (-\theta^\circ)}_{k=180} + \underbrace{\cos (-\theta^\circ - 1^\circ)}_{k=181} + \underbrace{\cos (-\theta^\circ-2^\circ)}_{k=182} + \cdots + \underbrace{\cos (-\theta^\circ-179^\circ)}_{k=359} \\ & = \sum_{k=0}^{179} \cos (-\theta^\circ-k^\circ) \end{aligned}

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years ago
Jason Dyer Staff
May 10, 2018

Relevant wiki: Trigonometric Periodicity Identities

The cosine value is the signed distance from the point on the unit circle to the y y -axis (or if written as a coordinate point, the x x part of the coordinate).

Each of the angle values has a matching one reflected over the y y -axis where the cosines are opposites. For example, cos ( 6 0 ) = cos ( 12 0 ) . \cos(60^\circ) = -\cos(120^\circ) . (The only exceptions are at 90 and 270 degrees, which are both 0 to begin with.) When these pairs are added up, they equal 0. Since all angle values from 0 to 359 can be matched in this way (this represents 180 pairs, 360 angles total) the overall sum must be 0.

It's more logical to pair up the ones that are reflected over the origin (so α \alpha and α + 180 \alpha + 180 , where α = θ + n \alpha = \theta + n ). They cancel each other out as well. Also in your explanation, there are no pairs when α \alpha is 9 0 90^\circ or 27 0 270^\circ ), which is not a big problem, because then c o s ( α ) cos(\alpha) is 0. Plus, when using the origin, it also works when θ \theta is not an integer.

Log in to reply

Oh, yes, I should mention the 90 and 270 degree points, thank you.

Jason Dyer Staff - 3 years ago

Relevant wiki: Sine and Cosine Graphs

The cos graph completes one cycle in 360 degrees. In those 360 values of cos, if the graph passes through some positive value x, it will always pass through negative x (-x) as well(refer the graph). Their sum cancels all the positive and negative values leaving behind an answer of 0 .

I wonder what the maximum value for θ \theta not an integer would be.

Jeremy Galvagni - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

The sum will equal to 0 even if θ \theta is not an integer. In fact, the sum will be 0 if θ \theta is any real number.

Log in to reply

Ah, I see. They still cancel out nicely. cos ( θ + x ) = cos ( θ + x + 180 ) \cos(\theta+x) = -\cos(\theta+x+180)

Jeremy Galvagni - 3 years ago

I don't entirely agree with this solution. If there would be 359 steps (instead of 360), all steps being 360/359 degree, the graph still passes through all values, but the sum does not go to 0, as cos(x+180 degrees) is not included in the sum, while it is included in the graph...

The point of the sum in the problem is that all terms can be matched up with the term 180 positions earlier or later, and the sum of these two is zero.

Francis Naldo
May 15, 2018

Whatever θ 0 \theta^{0} a.k.a starting point is, the expression above will always map a complete circle. The values of cos ( θ ) \cos(\theta) from the right side of the circle will cancel out the values on the left side. Therefore, answer is 0 0 .

Vasilis Goumas
May 14, 2018

Using Euler's formula we have: S = ( k = 0 359 e i ( θ + k ) ) S = \Re( \sum_{k=0}^{359} e^{i(\theta+k)} )

k = 0 359 e i ( θ + k ) = e i θ k = 0 359 e i k = \sum_{k=0}^{359} e^{i(\theta+k)} = e^{i\theta} \sum_{k=0}^{359} e^{ik} =

e i θ k = 0 359 ( e i ) k = e i θ k = 0 359 a k e^{i\theta} \sum_{k=0}^{359} (e^i)^k = e^{i\theta} \sum_{k=0}^{359} a^k for a = e i a = e^i

From the formula k = 0 k = n a k = a n + 1 1 a 1 \sum_{k=0}^{k=n} a^k = \frac{a^{n+1}-1}{a-1} we have:

S = e i θ ( e i ) 360 1 e i 1 = e i θ 0 = 0 S = e^{i\theta} \frac{(e^i)^{360}-1}{e^i-1} = e^{i\theta} * 0 = 0 where the last equality comes again from Euler's formula

Suresh Jh
May 2, 2018

I hav very easy solution. You are increasing the angle, but 'cos' will have value between 1 and -1 . Now you know that sum of value of cos from angle 0° to 360° =0 . And after every 360° same cycle will continue so answer will be 0 .

This is a bit too simple. You cannot go from the observation that the integral of the cos function is zero to a conclusion that the sum of the cos function over any given partition is also zero. You need to do a little more work than that.

Richard Desper - 3 years ago

The problem here is that you have to sum up discrete values over a period, not the continuous function itself. You can extend the given problem by saying you would like to sum up all vectors of the unit circle given with the angles (theta + x). You will find exactly 180 pairs of vectors that are antiparallel to each other, which means the sum of these are 0. Now you split up the vectors in sin- and cos- vectors, these pairs are also antiparallel to each other. The Sum of these vectors are then 0 too.

Pascal Engeler - 3 years ago

The sum is zero, independent of θ \theta being integer or not:

i = 0 359 c o s ( θ + i ) = i = 0 179 cos ( θ + i ) + i = 180 359 cos ( θ + i ) = i = 0 179 cos ( θ + i ) + i = 0 179 cos ( θ + i + 18 0 ) = i = 0 179 ( cos ( θ + i ) cos ( θ + i ) ) = i = 0 179 0 = 0 \begin{aligned} \sum_{i=0}^{359} cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ)&=\sum_{i=0}^{179} \cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ)+\sum_{i=180}^{359}\cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ)\\&=\sum_{i=0}^{179} \cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ)+\sum_{i=0}^{179} \cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ+180^\circ)\\&=\sum_{i=0}^{179} (\cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ)-\cos(\theta^\circ+i^\circ))\\&=\sum_{i=0}^{179} 0\\&=0 \end{aligned}

From the problem's figure of a trigonometric circle, it can be easily seen that the cosine function of an angle rotated half circle ( 18 0 180^\circ ) is the opposite value to the cosine of the original angle (i. e., cos ( θ + 18 0 ) = cos ( θ ) \cos(\theta^\circ+180^\circ)=-\cos(\theta^\circ) ). If we pair the first term with the 181th one, the second with 182th,... the 180th with the 359th, we get pairs of cosines of angles 18 0 180^\circ apart, which sums to zero. 360 angles, 180 pairs of opposed values, 180 zeros, the total sum is zero. This result is valid even if θ \theta is not an integer.

In general,

cos θ + cos ( θ + d ) + cos ( θ + 2 d ) + cos ( θ + 3 d ) + + cos ( θ + ( n 1 ) d ) = cos ( θ + ( n 1 ) d 2 ) sin ( n d 2 ) sin ( d 2 ) \boxed{\cos\theta+\cos(\theta+d)+\cos(\theta+2d)+\cos(\theta+3d)+\ldots+\cos(\theta+(n-1)d)=\frac{\cos\left(\theta+\frac{(n-1)d}{2}\right)\sin\left(\frac{nd}{2}\right)}{\sin\left(\frac{d}{2}\right)}}

cos θ + cos ( θ + 1 ) + cos ( θ + 2 ) + cos ( θ + 3 ) + + cos ( θ + 35 9 ) = cos ( θ + ( 360 1 ) 1 2 ) sin ( 36 0 2 ) sin ( 1 2 ) \therefore \cos{\theta}^\circ+\cos(\theta^\circ+1^\circ)+\cos(\theta^\circ+2^\circ)+\cos(\theta^\circ+3^\circ)+\ldots+\cos(\theta^\circ+359^\circ)=\frac{\cos\left(\theta^\circ+\frac{(360-1)1}{2}\right)^\circ\sin\left(\frac{360^\circ}{2}\right)}{\sin\left(\frac{1^\circ}{2}\right)}

= cos ( θ + 17 9 ) sin 18 0 sin 0. 5 = 0 =\frac{\cos(\theta^\circ+179^\circ)\sin180^\circ}{\sin0.5^\circ}=0

Did the same!

Akshat Sharda - 3 years ago
Richard Desper
May 13, 2018

Note that cos ( θ + 180 ) = cos ( θ ) \cos(\theta + 180) = -\cos(\theta)

We can arrange the terms of the sum such that cos ( θ + x ) \cos(\theta +x) is paired with cos ( θ + x + 180 ) \cos(\theta + x + 180) , for x = 0 x = 0 to 179 179 . The sum of each pair is zero, thus the entire sum is zero.

Note that this identity doesn't require θ \theta to be an integer, or even rational.

Tom Verhoeff
May 20, 2018

In Turtle Geometry, it is well-known that the turtle program turn θ ; repeat N times : forward 1 ; turn 36 0 / N \mbox{turn } \theta; \mbox{ repeat } N \mbox{ times : forward } 1; \mbox{ turn } 360^\circ/N traces out a regular N N -gon, where the turtle ends again at its starting position. The projection on the x-axis of the vertices accumulates cos θ + i 36 0 / N \cos \theta+i 360^\circ/N . The image illustrates this for N = 4 N=4 , with ϕ = 36 0 / 4 \phi=360^\circ/4 and x k = i = 1 k cos θ + i 36 0 / 4 x_k = \sum_{i=1}^{k}\cos \theta+i 360^\circ/4 . The question involves a regular 360-gon, for which x 360 = 0 x_{360}=0 .

Betty BellaItalia
May 19, 2018

Geeta Thakur
May 19, 2018

Since all cos values repeat after 360 degrees...we essentially need to calculate cos 0 + cos 1 + cos 2 + cos 3 + .....+ cos 360.

cos theta = opp/hyp for a unit circle.... = y values/1 so essentially we have to add up all the y co-ordinates at theta = 1,2,3,4,.....360 this has to cancel each other out and add up to zero

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...