This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
but if we think logically and not just mathematically , 1 - something would be less than 1 and , something less than 1 when multiplied by itself an infinite amount would become zero , plz tell if i am wrong.
Log in to reply
Yes, I think you are wrong,I think your problem is that these terms approach to 1 . I can prove that x → a lim ( 1 + f ( x ) ) f ( x ) 1 = e , if x → a lim f ( x ) = 0 . Do you want me to prove it? It's similar to n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n 1 ) n = e = n → ∞ lim ( 1 − n 1 ) − n " = 1 ∞ "
Log in to reply
no, i already know that identity but i want to say that 1/n^2 is infintely small but still has some value and when we subtract it from 1 , the number we get will approach 1 from left side on number line . and something even a little less than 1 when raised to power infinity will tend to zero. i also could have reached the answer mathematically but i want to solve it using pure arguments . plz help
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Sometimes, we are wrong about some things that seem logical and obviously true for us, for instance, ( 1 − n 1 ) n seems approaching to 0 , because ( 1 − n 1 ) < 1 , but actually n → ∞ lim ( 1 − n 1 ) n = e 1 . Nevertheless, there is always a true and correct justification (logic) demonstrating that we are wrong. If you want I can detail you one concrete question? Do you have one concrete question for me? do you want me to prove(wit logic-mathemathics arguments) that n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n 1 ) n = e ⇒ n → ∞ lim ( 1 − n 1 ) n = e 1
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – yes i would be glad if you prove it logically only with giving arguments and not some textbook proof, thanks for seeing to my problem
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – The sequence ( 1 + 1 / n ) n is a strictly increasing sequence and it's bounded by 3. This implies that this sequence has a limit. If you take a calculator, you'll see that the limit is approaching to e ≈ 2 . 7 1 8 . . . . Make the proof. Take again other calculator and make the same with ( 1 − 1 / n ) n , it will convince you, little by little to the right result. If you want me to make a logical proof, I'll be using a text book... My advice: You have to convince yourself... Start with a calculator....
L = n → ∞ lim ( 1 − n 2 1 ) n = n → ∞ lim exp ( n ln ( 1 − n 2 1 ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( n 1 ln ( 1 − n 2 1 ) ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( − n 2 1 n 2 − 1 2 n − n 2 2 n ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( − n ( n 2 − 1 ) 2 n 2 ) = n → ∞ lim exp ( − 1 − n 2 1 n 2 ) = e 0 = 1 exp ( x ) = e x 0/0 case, L’H o ˆ pital’s rule applies Differentiate up and down Divide up and down by n 3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
n → ∞ lim ( 1 − n 2 1 ) n = n → ∞ lim ( 1 − n 2 1 ) − n − n 2 = = n → ∞ lim ( ( 1 − n 2 1 ) − n 2 ) − n 1 = " n → ∞ lim e − n 1 " = 1