Enclosed Area 8-22-2020

Calculus Level 4

What is the area enclosed by the curve?

5 x 2 + y 2 + 3 x y x + 4 y 3 = 0 5x^2 + y^2 + 3 x y - x + 4 y - 3 = 0

Inspiration


The answer is 21.7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Aug 23, 2020

For an ellipse or hyperbola of the form A x 2 + B x y + C y 2 + D x + E y + F = 0 Ax^2 +Bxy+Cy^2 +Dx+Ey+F=0 , it can be transformed into the following standard form ( reference ):

x 2 S / ( λ 1 2 λ 2 ) + y 2 S / ( λ 1 λ 2 2 ) = 1 \frac {x'^2} {-S/(\lambda_1^2 \lambda_2)}+\frac {y'^2} {-S/(\lambda_1 \lambda_2^2)}=1

where S = det [ A B / 2 D / 2 B / 2 C E / 2 D / 2 E / 2 F ] S=\det\begin{bmatrix} A & B/2 & D/2 \\ B/2 & C & E/2 \\ D/2 & E/2 & F \end {bmatrix} ; and λ 1 \lambda_1 and λ 2 \lambda_2 are eigenvalues of [ A B / 2 B / 2 C ] \begin{bmatrix} A & B/2 \\ B/2 & C \end {bmatrix} or the roots of λ 2 ( A + C ) λ + ( A C ( B / 2 ) 2 ) = 0 \lambda^2 - (A+C) \lambda +(AC-(B/2)^2) =0 . Putting in the values, we have

S = 5 3 / 2 1 / 2 3 / 2 1 2 1 / 2 2 3 = 63 2 S=\begin{vmatrix} 5 & 3/2 & - 1/2 \\ 3/2 & 1 & 2 \\ - 1/2 & -2 & - 3 \end {vmatrix} = - \frac {63}2

λ 2 6 λ + 11 4 = 0 4 λ 2 24 λ + 11 = 0 ( 2 λ 1 ) ( 2 λ 11 ) = 0 λ 1 , λ 2 = 1 2 , 11 2 \begin{aligned} \lambda^2 - 6\lambda +\frac {11}4 & =0 \\ 4\lambda^2 - 24\lambda +11 & =0 \\ (2\lambda - 1) (2\lambda - 11) & =0 \\ \implies \lambda_1, \lambda_2 & = \frac 12, \frac {11} 2 \end{aligned}

Since area of an ellipse is given by π a b \pi ab , where a a and b b are the semi-axes, then π a b = S ( λ 1 λ 2 ) 3 2 21.7 \pi ab =-S(\lambda_1 \lambda_2)^\frac 32 \approx \boxed{21.7} .

Talulah Riley
Aug 22, 2020

@Steven Chase is it feasible to do the above problem using pen and paper only?

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

It looks like it is. See Hosam's solution

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Did you understand his whole solution completely?? I am not able to understand his solution.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley No, that's not really my style either

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase So do you want to understand???

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Not really. As long as I have a way of solving, I don't need to know every possible way

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Suppose just imagine if python programming is banned in USA, then what will you do?
You should have some alternative approach. Isn't it??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley I'll switch to C++

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase if C++ and every type of this computational approach is banned then what??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Then the situation is so messed up that nobody will bother solving these types of problems in their spare time

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Then according to that if you don't mind this problem should posted in computer science section, because this problem only needs Computational approach.
The calculus section should full of only those problem that are good and trick and not should contain very very difficult maths which needs to be solved with computer only.
Isn't it??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley People can solve however they want. I don't care what method is used. And this is absolutely not a computer science problem.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase if this is absolutely not a computer science then why you are using computer ??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Because computer science has nothing to do with using computers

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Then why “computer science”word contains “computer” ??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Computer science is really the study of algorithms and such. The properties of the algorithms are independent of the machines running them. Computer science problems typically deal with algorithms, data structures, sorting techniques, etc. Numerical calculus is not typically considered a computer science topic.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Then while doing Numerical integration why you use computer??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley There is no other practical way to do numerical calculus.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Now finally I bring you to the end of the loop, that is why I am saying this should be posted in computer science section.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley That is not even remotely the case

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase what case?
I didn't understand

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley This is either a geometry problem, or a calculus problem depending on how you choose to solve it

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase ok I agree
Then you should use geometry or calculus, but by neglecting both the things you are using computer why?

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Talulah Riley I admire his solution very much; he did it without using any calculus. Basically, he found the rotation and translation of the equation, and found the original ellipse. It's all super algebraic and feels a bit arcane lol

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Lil Doug

That previous comment chain is so long that it is barely readable. I have not neglected calculus. If you are summing infinitesimal quantities to derive a result, you are doing integral calculus. Whether you do the summing by hand or using a computer, is just an implementation detail.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Then why my mathematics teacher doesn't allow me to do integration using python.
When I showed him a python code of a good integration instead of complementing , he scolded me, he said me that you have to do with pen and paper only .
Whether you do the summing by hand or using a computer, is just an implementation detail.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Apparently, he wants you to become proficient at doing integrals by hand, using anti-differentiation. That does not mean, however, that numerical calculus is not calculus.

In general, there are two main ways of evaluating an integral, both of which are calculus.

1) Compute an anti-derivative. This is typically what hand analysis consists of
2) Compute a Riemann sum. This is typically what numerical calculus does

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase But why he wants me to become proficient, if we have another simple way.
All should have to use computers simply.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley It's nice to know about anti-differentiation. It's a useful skill. But I agree with you that there is too much emphasis on it in calculus instruction. Numerical techniques should be taught at least as much as anti-differentiation, in my opinion.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Till now I have not used that useful skill .
And if we go in higher levels like making rockets, a very big projects , the integration used in that purpose can't be done with hand.
So at the end we have to use python/Matlab. So what is the use of that skill?

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley I would argue that anti-differentiation is still important to know, at least at a basic level. But as you say, in many cases, numerical integration is required. I think the key is just to use the right tool for the job. And there are certain cases in which numerical methods have problems, and hand analysis does better. And if I run into a situation where I need to solve a problem and I can't use numerical methods, I will try some other way.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase in which case you are not able to use numerical methods,
If you are not able to do, it doesn't mean that, it can't be done with numerical techniques.
Maybe you don't know that type of numerical technique.
Please don't mind.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley For example, if the integrand takes on infinite values, or if the integration range is infinitely big (from zero to infinity, for example), numerical integration can potentially have trouble.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase if the value of y is increasing if x is increasing then it is obviously that answer will be infinite and it is not a problem of numerical integration. But the y should decrease as x increase, then by putting x as 1000and then 1500 and then 2000,we can definitely reach to the answer.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Yeah, I think the infinities in the integrand is a bigger problem. For example, this problem.

https://brilliant.org/problems/integrate-cotx-sin4x-from-0-to-pi/

At x = 0 x = 0 , the integrand is undefined 0 0 \frac{0}{0} , and yet the integral still presumably converges to some finite value. For that type of problem, hand analysis is better than numerical integration.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase I think you should integrate from x=0.01 to x=π.
When you put x=0 to x=π . The computer doesn't able to swallow that information because at x=0 the graph is approaching infinity.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley And then you would have to try again starting at x = 0.001 x = 0.001 , etc. and see if the answer is the same (approximately).

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase But you don't need to worry sir .
When I will go to university, I will make such programming software which can integrate functions from x=0.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley I look forward to it :)

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase what will you look forward? :)

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley To your revolutionary new software program. Maybe I can get a free license

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase Why not, you will be the first user of that software. And you will get free license lifetime. Just chill sir.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Bro can I get a free license?

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Krishna Karthik @Krishna Karthik no bro sorry.
Only @Steven Chase sir

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley lmao all good man, jk

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Talulah Riley Actually, artificial intelligence will easily be able to solve any type of integral.

21st century will bring about great computerised advancement.

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Steven Chase Numerical techniques are more useful, if anything, than analytical calculus. Most integrals/differential equations found in real life will be barely solvable using analytical approaches (Navier-Stokes equation is an example). I agree.

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Talulah Riley Also a historical note. For the great majority of history, we haven't had powerful digital computers. Therefore, all of the standard curriculum has been focused on anti-differentiation by hand, since the direct computation of Riemann sums has been impossible until lately. So the old way of teaching still has a huge amount of momentum.

Steven Chase - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase So it is job of education system to destroy that momentum, because that techniques take very time instead of that use python and enjoy .

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

I personally think your maths teacher is living in the 19th century. That's a very old fashioned way of thinking. Physics and maths in the 21st century can't be done using only hand. It's stupid.

Listen up: if you wanna be a good physicist, you will have to learn numerical techniques. Tell him that no one is using blackboard and chalk anymore.

By the way, in contrast with living in India vs living in Australia, I have found Indian teachers to be much more ancient and old-fashioned. Just because your teacher isn't keeping up with the rest of the world, don't get disheartened. The Indian system limits imagination.

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago
Steven Chase
Sep 3, 2020

One way to solve this numerically is to sweep x x over a range. For a particular value of x x , there is a quadratic equation to solve for y y . Call the two solutions y p y_p and y n y_n , where y p y n y_p \geq y_n . The infinitesimal area is d A = ( y p y n ) d x dA = (y_p - y_n) dx . This method is applicable to any ellipse; even ones that do not contain the origin.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
import math

dx = 10.0**(-6.0)

x = -5.0

A = 0.0

flag = 0

while x <= 5.0:

    a = 1.0
    b = 3.0*x + 4.0
    c = 5.0*(x**2.0) - x - 3.0

    q = b**2.0 - 4.0*a*c

    if q >= 0.0:

        root = math.sqrt(q)

        yp = (-b + root)/(2.0*a)
        yn = (-b - root)/(2.0*a)

        if yp < yn:
            flag = 1

        dA = (yp-yn)*dx
        A = A + dA

        #print x,yp
        #print x,yn

    x = x + dx

print ""
print ""

print dx
print flag
print A

#1e-05
#0
#21.7000825478
#>>>

#1e-06
#0
#21.7000825386
#>>> 

@Lil Doug

Steven Chase - 9 months, 1 week ago

@Steven Chase Thanks , love you sir.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

You're welcome. One thing to note is that the simple polar way only works if the ellipse contains the origin

Steven Chase - 9 months, 1 week ago

We will make use of the following three facts :

Any transformation of axes system can be represented as the combination of translation and rotation .

It is immaterial which operation is executed first, translation or rotation. The final result is the same .

Transformation of axes system in a direction is equivalent to the same transformation of a figure in the opposite direction

Shifting the origin of coordinates from ( 0 , 0 ) (0,0) to ( 14 11 , 43 11 ) (\dfrac {14}{11},-\dfrac {43}{11})

and then rotating the axes system counterclockwise through an angle of tan 1 ( 1 3 ) \tan^{-1} (\frac 13) , the given equation of the curve is reduced to

X 2 252 121 + Y 2 252 11 = 1 \dfrac {X^2}{\frac{252}{121}}+\dfrac {Y^2}{\frac{252}{11}}=1

So, length of the major semi-axis is

252 121 \sqrt {\dfrac {252}{121}}

and the length of the minor semi-axis is

252 11 \sqrt {\dfrac {252}{11}}

Therefore the area enclosed by the curve is

π × 252 121 × 252 11 π\times \sqrt {\dfrac {252}{121}}\times \sqrt {\dfrac {252}{11}}

= 252 π 11 11 21.7 =\dfrac {252π}{11\sqrt {11}}\approx \boxed {21.7} .

Details

First give the translation of the axes system according to the law

x = x + h , y = y + k x=x'+h, y=y'+k such that the linear terms in the given equation vanish. This will lead to h = 14 11 , k = 43 11 h=\dfrac {14}{11},k=-\dfrac {43}{11} .

Then give the axes system a counterclockwise rotation through an angle α α to obtain a new system X , Y X, Y according to the law :

x = X cos α Y sin α x'=X\cos α-Y\sin α

y = X sin α + Y cos α y'=X\sin α+Y\cos α

such that the x y x'y' terms vanish. This will lead to α = tan 1 ( 1 3 ) α=\tan^{-1} (\frac 13) .

Finally simplify the equation to obtain the required form.

The same thing can be done using the translation and the rotation matrices, which is elaborated by Hosam Hajjir :

X = T R x = R T x X =TRx=RTx , where X X and x x are the transformed and the original coordinate matrices, T T and R R are the translation and the rotation matrices respectively.

A Former Brilliant Member - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Foolish Learner Thanks I understood this clearly. But after that shifting, what did you do?

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

It's told in the details. Read carefully.

A Former Brilliant Member - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member @Foolish Learner I am not able to understand.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

@Foolish Learner after shifting the origin to 14 11 , 43 11 \frac{14}{11}, \frac{-43}{11} , what did you do??

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago
Hosam Hajjir
Aug 22, 2020

Let r = [ x y ] T r = \begin{bmatrix} x && y \end{bmatrix}^T be a column vector representing the coordinates x x and y y , then the given equation can be written as

r T A r + b T r + c = 0 r^T A r + b^T r + c = 0

where,

A = [ 5 3 2 3 2 1 ] A = \begin{bmatrix} 5 && \frac{3}{2} \\ \frac{3}{2} && 1 \end{bmatrix}

b T = [ 1 4 ] b^T = \begin{bmatrix} -1 && 4 \end{bmatrix}

c = 3 c = -3

The first step is to eliminate the linear term ( b T r b^T r ), and to do that, we define

r 0 = 1 2 A 1 b r_0 = -\frac{1}{2} A^{-1} b

Then, one can see that, similar to completing the square, we can write,

r T A r + b T r = ( r r 0 ) T A ( r r 0 ) r 0 T A r 0 r^T A r + b^T r = (r - r_0)^T A (r - r_0) - r_0^T A r_0

To see why this is so, note that

( r r 0 ) T A ( r r 0 ) r 0 T A r 0 = r T A r 2 r T A r 0 = r T A r + r T b = r T A r + b T r (r - r_0)^T A (r - r_0) - r_0^T A r_0 = r^T A r - 2 r^T A r_0 = r^T A r + r^T b = r^T A r + b^T r

So now the given equation can be written as,

( r r 0 ) T A ( r r 0 ) = c + r 0 T A r 0 = d (r - r_0)^T A (r - r_0) = -c + r_0^T A r_0 = d

After calculating r 0 r_0 , the right hand side of the above equation comes to d = 11 5 11 = 126 11 d = 11 \frac{5}{11} = \frac{126}{11}

To put the above in the standard format, we divide both sides by d d , and this gives,

( r r 0 ) T ( 1 d A ) ( r r 0 ) = 1 (r - r_0)^T ( \frac{1}{d} A ) (r - r_0) = 1

One can check that matrix A A is positive definite (i.e. both its eigenvalues are positive), by noting that A 11 > 0 A_{11} > 0 and A > 0 | A | > 0 , and therefore, the above equation represents an ellipse. We need to find the product of the lengths of the semi-axes, and this is equal to the square root of the reciprocal of the determinant of 1 d A \frac{1}{d} A . In other words,

a b = 1 1 d A a b = \dfrac{1}{ \sqrt{ | \frac{1}{d} A | } }

Since A A is 2 × 2 2 \times 2 , then 1 d A = 1 d 2 A | \dfrac{1}{d} A | = \dfrac{1}{d^2} | A |

Hence,

a b = d A = ( 126 11 ) 5 9 4 = ( 126 11 ) 11 4 = 252 11 11 a b = \dfrac{d}{ \sqrt{ | A | } } = \dfrac{ \left( \dfrac{126}{11} \right) }{ \sqrt{ 5 - \frac{9}{4} } } = \dfrac{ \left( \dfrac{126}{11} \right) }{ \sqrt{ \frac{11}{4} } } = \dfrac{ 252 } { 11 \sqrt{11} }

And the area is A = π a b = 252 π 11 11 21.7 A = \pi a b =\dfrac{ 252 \pi } { 11 \sqrt{11} } \approx 21.7

@Hosam Hajjir Hello sir
What is the meaning of T T in your solution?

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

T T means 'Transpose', so if r r is a column vector , then r T r^T is a row vector with the same entries.

Hosam Hajjir - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Yes; A T A^{T} refers to the transpose of a matrix. What this means, basically, is that the matrix is flipped over on its side. An alternative way of notating this is A A' .

If you transposed this vector: v = < x , y , z > \bold{\vec{v}} = <x, y, z> , you would basically make it a column vector like so:

v = [ x y z ] \bold{\vec{v}} = \begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \\ \end{bmatrix}

Same with a matrix. Think of transposing a matrix or a vector as flipping it onto it's left side, or turning it 90 degrees anti-clockwise.

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Transpose, which for a unitary orthogonal matrix is also the inverse of the matrix and much easier to compute

A Former Brilliant Member - 9 months, 3 weeks ago

From Wolfram Mathworld's Ellipse article :

a = 5 ; b = 3 2 ; c = 1 ; d = 1 2 ; e = 2 ; f = 3 ; a=5;b=\frac{3}{2};c=1;d=-\frac{1}{2};e=2;f=-3;

a x 2 + 2 b x y + c y 2 + 2 d x + 2 e y + f = 0 5 x 2 + 3 x y x + y 2 + 4 y 3 = 0 a x^2+2 b x y+c y^2+2 d x+2 e y+f=0\to 5 x^2+3 x y-x+y^2+4 y-3=0

Δ = a b d b c e d e f 63 2 \Delta =\left| \begin{array}{ccc} a & b & d \\ b & c & e \\ d & e & f \\ \end{array} \right|\to -\frac{63}{2}

Ξ = a b b c 11 4 \Xi =\left| \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ b & c \\ \end{array} \right|\to \frac{11}{4}

I = a + c 6 I=a+c\to 6

Δ I ( 21 / 4 ) \frac{\Delta }{I}\to -(21/4)

Since Δ 0 \Delta \neq 0 , Ξ > 0 \Xi >0 , and Δ I < 0 \frac{\Delta }{I}<0 , assuming the conic section is not degenerate (which if it were, then the problem would be nonsense), then it is an ellipse.

δ = b 2 a c 11 4 \delta =b^2-a c\to -\frac{11}{4}

The center of the ellipse is at ( c e b d δ 14 11 , a b d e δ 43 11 ) (\frac{\left| \begin{array}{cc} c & e \\ b & d \\ \end{array} \right| }{\delta }\to \frac{14}{11},\frac{\left| \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ d & e \\ \end{array} \right| }{\delta }\to -\frac{43}{11})

Translating the ellipse so that its center is at the origin, which does not change its area. This is done by substituting new values for the variables and simplifying.

5 x 1 2 + 3 x 1 y 1 + y 1 2 126 11 = 0 5 {x_1}^2+3 {x_1} {y_1}+{y_1}^2-\frac{126}{11}=0

Note that linear terms are now gone.

The next problem is rotating the ellipse onto the axes, which also does not change the area.

The rotation angle is 1 2 tan 1 ( 2 b a c ) ( cos ( 1 2 tan 1 ( 3 4 ) ) sin ( 1 2 tan 1 ( 3 4 ) ) sin ( 1 2 tan 1 ( 3 4 ) ) cos ( 1 2 tan 1 ( 3 4 ) ) ) \frac{1}{2} \tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{2 b}{a-c}\right)\to \left( \begin{array}{cc} \cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\right) & -\sin \left(\frac{1}{2} \tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\right) \\ \sin \left(\frac{1}{2} \tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\right) & \cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\right) \\ \end{array} \right) , in which you can see the Pythagoras 3-4-5 triangle, which permits that rotation matrix to be simplified in turn to ( 3 10 1 10 1 10 3 10 ) \left( \begin{array}{cc} \frac{3}{\sqrt{10}} & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} & \frac{3}{\sqrt{10}} \\ \end{array} \right) .

After substituting the rotated coordinates and simplifying: 1 11 ( 11 ( 11 x 2 2 + y 2 2 ) = 252 ) \frac{1}{11} \left(11 \left(11 {x_2}^2+{y_2}^2\right)=252\right)

By substituting zero for x2 and y2 in turn, the semi-radii are 6 7 11 \frac{6 \sqrt{7}}{11} and 6 7 11 6 \sqrt{\frac{7}{11}} , respectively.

Therefore, the area is π 6 7 11 6 7 11 252 π 11 11 21.7001 \pi 6 \frac{\sqrt{7}}{11} 6 \sqrt{\frac{7}{11}}\to \frac{252 \pi }{11 \sqrt{11}}\approx 21.7001

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...