Can You Count Them All?

How many rectangles are there?

16 10 22 25 28

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Eli Ross Staff
Oct 19, 2015

We can break these up into two types.

First Type: Rectangles in a single "column". Note that if a column has n n rectangles, then there are n n individual rectangles, then n 1 n-1 rectangles by combining 2 adjacent ones, and so on. There are 20 of these types:

Second Type: Rectangles that span multiple "columns". These are easy to just count; there are 5 of them.

Its not an overly clear picture. I choose 16, some of the shapes are/look very close to squares.

Kevin Bishop - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

In fact, squares are a special type of rectangle. A rectangle is a Quadrilateral with 4 right angles and equal-length opposite sides.

Eli Ross Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

This is a very misleading question then. Common sense tells us that a square is not a rectangle. How are we supposed to know wh.ich perspectibe we need to look at this from

Ethan Czereda - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ethan Czereda A square is just a special type of a rectangle, as mentioned above.

You can think of this similarly to real numbers. For example, an integer (e.g., 2) is just a special case of a real number. If you were asked how many real numbers were in { π , 2 , 1 2 , 1 } \left\{\pi,\ 2,\ \frac{1}{2},\ \sqrt{-1}\right\} , you would definitely count the 2!

Eli Ross Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

@Ethan Czereda Definitions: A Rectangle is an equiangular Quadrilateral. A Square is an equiangular, equilateral Quadrilateral. Therefore: All square are Rectangles. Some Rectangles are Squares.

btw: It is also true that : All Squares are Rhombi. A Rhombus is an equilateral Quadrilateral.

Mathematics isn't based on common sense. If you know the definitions and logic you will do all right.

Robert Lucas - 5 years, 7 months ago

Different perspectives on this I guess Eli. I prefer to define all of rectangles, rhombi, squares, parallelograms, trapezoids, isosceles trapezoids and kites* as special quadrilaterals.
Some texts will DEFINE rectangles, rhombi and squares as special parallelograms - not my choice. Doesn't really include their quadrialateralness in the definition and I think it belongs there. *Definitions of kites as a special quadrilateral seem to vary. A Kite is a quadrilateral with two distinct pairs of congruent, consecutive sides. This allows squares to be kites (two distinct ways the count the pairs of sides). A Kite is a quadrilateral with two distinct pairs of congruent, consecutive sides
but is not equilateral. This definition does not allow squares to be a subset of kites. I prefer the first. Your definition of rectangle goes beyond the definition (equiangular) Four right angles and opposite sides congruent are properties derivable from that definition.

I am sorry - I have strayed way off the original problem. They are a favorite of mine. I prefer a chart of the special quadrilaterals to show their relationships to each other. When I do Venn diagrams I use colored borders or cross hatched interiors.

Robert Lucas - 5 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...