Suppose an inverted cone of radius 3 and height 4 is filled with water. (The central axis is perpendicular to the ground, allowing the water to reach the entirety of the cone's rim.) A sphere of radius r made of a material denser than water is then placed gently in the water and allowed to come to rest in contact with the cone, displacing water as it settles. (That is, the volume of water displaced is the same as the volume of the settled sphere that lies below the plane that includes the rim of the cone.)
The radius of the sphere that results in the maximum displacement of water can be expressed as r = n m , where m and n are coprime positive integers. Find m + n .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You write the best solutions! Thank you for posting this.
You are welcome.
Here's a nice plot of the volume of the displacement as a function of r , with a clear unique maximum.
This plot assumes that the cone is deeper than 4 , but water level is at 4 .
Thanks for plotting the graph, Michael. It took me a minute to realize why it went to 0 for r = 6 ; with the cone continuing to extend upward past the water line as you have it, the water line would be tangent to a sphere of radius 6 . For 0 ≤ r ≤ 2 3 the graph is proportional to r 3 as the sphere will lie completely under the water level. For 2 3 ≤ r ≤ 4 1 5 the sphere will not "bulge' out past the extension of the slant line of the cone and thus will match Dr. Bretscher's formula, and for r > 4 1 5 without the side extension the curve would be flatter than your plot, stretching out so that the x-axis is an asymptote.
Log in to reply
Well, yes, if I worked with a "hard rim" at height 4 , then the curve would extend to the right indefinitely, as r → ∞ . But I was more interested in the behavior of the curve at r = 2 3 , where the differential remains continuous. Why this should be so is not immediately obvious in the equations.
Log in to reply
That is interesting. For 0 ≤ r ≤ 2 3 the displaced volume is of course V 1 = 3 4 π r 3 and for 2 3 ≤ r ≤ 4 1 5 the displaced volume is V 2 = 8 1 4 π ( 6 − r ) 2 ( 1 1 r − 1 2 ) . We then have V 1 ′ = 8 π r and V 2 ′ = 2 7 4 π ( 6 − r ) ( 3 0 − 1 1 r ) = 2 7 4 π ( 1 1 r 2 − 9 6 r + 1 8 0 ) .
As V 1 ( 2 3 ) = V 2 ( 2 3 ) and V 1 ′ ( 2 3 ) = V 2 ′ ( 2 3 ) both the curves and their first derivatives are continuous at the transition point, as you have noted. But with V 1 ′ ′ = 8 π r and V 2 ′ ′ = 2 7 8 π ( 1 1 r − 4 8 ) the second derivatives are not continuous at the transition point, with V 2 ′ ′ ( 2 3 ) < 0 < V 1 ′ ′ ( 2 3 ) , resulting in an inflection point, (by the sufficiency condition). I don't know what I was expecting here, but the fact that the first derivatives are continuous at the transition point is a curiosity.
Log in to reply
@Brian Charlesworth – One way to interpret this intuitively is to compare two spheres of the same radius which shrinks over time, the difference being that one of the spheres has a thin cap sliced off---until the critical value of r = 2 3 is reached. Since the rate of change of the volume is directly proportional to the surfaces of the spheres, we can see how as that thin cap grows thinner, the first order difference between the two surfaces vanishes. So, both functions would agree not only at that critical value, but their first derivatives as well.
Log in to reply
@Michael Mendrin – Makes sense. Thanks for the insight. :)
Lovely problem! Thanks, Brian! This will make a great bonus question for a calculus exam!
Let me jot down a solution; I'm sure it can be streamlined.
If the center of the sphere is a units above the water level (with a ≤ 4 9 ) , its distance from the cone is r = 5 1 2 + 3 a by the line-point distance formula (consider a vertical cross section), and a = 3 5 r − 1 2 . The height of the spherical cap below the water level is h = r − a = 3 1 2 − 2 r , and the volume is V = 3 π h 2 ( 3 r − h ) . A little calculus shows that the maximum is attained when r = 1 1 3 0 ; the answer is 4 1 .
Thanks for a clear, succinct solution! (+1) My approach was a bit messier, but I hope to post it later anyway just for sake of variety. I'm pleased to hear that this question will show up as a bonus exam question someday! :)
Log in to reply
The students may not be that pleased, however ;) I will let you know whether anybody gets it.
Do you consider my solution sufficiently complete, or do I need to address the case a ≥ 4 9 , when the sphere touches the rim of the cone?
Log in to reply
No, I think that's fine. As the radius of the sphere is increased so that a ≥ 4 9 then the volume of water displaced clearly starts to decrease, as the spherical surface below the rim plane "flattens out".
Log in to reply
@Brian Charlesworth – Yes, that's exactly how I thought of it! No need to find the exact volume of the cap.
Recognizing there is a 3-4-5 right triangle in the cone's cross-section, a formula relating the radius of a sphere tangent to the sides of the extended cone and whose center is at height p above the tip of the cone is r = 5 3 p .The depth of the spherical cap is h = Which [ p ≥ 1 0 , 0 , p < 2 5 , 2 r , True , 4 − ( p − r ) ] . This yields a formula of the spherical cap whose sphere center is a height p : f = { 1 2 5 3 6 π p 3 3 7 5 4 π ( p − 1 0 ) 2 ( 1 1 p − 2 0 ) 0 2 p < 5 2 5 ≤ p < 1 0 True
Maximizing f (the bit of calculus mentioned elsewhere -- computing the derivative and solving for 0) gives p = 1 1 5 0 , which gives r = 1 1 3 0 , which give a final answer of 41.
My plot looks similar Michael Mendrin's.
t a n ( a ) = 4 3 , from which s i n ( a ) = 5 3 Then easy trig shows that the radius of the sphere is 5 3 x … ( 1 ) The volume we are looking for is the spherical 'cap' lying under the water plane. I put cap in quotes because the way I'm using it it looks more like the rest of the head than a little cap on top of the head. However the formula invoked by other solvers, V = 3 π h 2 ( 3 R − h ) , still applies. We have the radius from (1) and it is easy to see that the height of the cap is 4 − 5 2 x . Putting this all together we see that we have to maximise
Let the radius of the circle be x, measured upwards from the apex of the cone. From the geometry of the cone we have3 π ( 4 − 5 2 x ) 2 ( 5 9 x − ( 4 x − 5 2 x ) )
This is an easy exercise (for folk working at Calculus level 5) and the maximum occurs when x = 1 1 5 0
Substituting in (1) then gives the radius as 1 1 3 0 and so the answer is 4 1
@Brian Charlesworth Sir, this is similar to a problem posted earlier.....
Yes, it is similar, but this one was originally posted two years before that one. I reshared this one as I thought newer members to Brilliant might enjoy giving it a try.
Log in to reply
Ohhh!!! I hadn't noticed that this was an even older problem!! I thought that it was new! Thanks for sharing it, Sir...:)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As shown in the figure, the volume of water displacement V by a sphere of radius r is given by the volume of the sphere minus the volume of the spherical cap with a height of h . In equation, we have:
V d r d V = V sphere − V cap = 3 4 π r 3 − 3 π h 2 ( 3 r − h ) = 3 π ( 4 r 3 − h 2 ( 3 r − h ) ) = 3 π ( 4 r 3 − ( 3 8 r − 4 ) 2 ( 3 1 r + 4 ) ) = 8 1 π ( 1 0 8 r 3 − ( 8 r − 1 2 ) 2 ( r + 1 2 ) ) = 8 1 π ( 4 4 r 3 − 5 7 6 r 2 + 2 1 6 0 r − 1 7 2 8 ) = 8 1 4 π ( 1 1 r 3 − 1 4 4 r 2 + 5 4 0 r − 4 3 2 ) = 8 1 4 π ( 3 3 r 2 − 2 8 8 r + 5 4 0 ) = 2 7 4 π ( 1 1 r − 3 0 ) ( r − 6 0 ) See note: h = 3 8 r − 4 Differentiate both sides w.r.t. r
Putting d r d V = 0 , then we have r = 1 1 3 0 or r = 6 0 . Since d r 2 d 2 V ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ r = 1 1 3 0 < 0 , V is maximum when r = 1 1 3 0 .
Therefore, m + n = 3 0 + 1 1 = 4 1 .
Note: Let the center of the sphere be O , the vertex of the cone be P and the point of contact of the sphere and internal wall of the cone be R , Then △ O P R is an right triangle with O R : R P : P O = 3 : 4 : 5 . Implying P O = 3 5 r and h = r + 3 5 r − 4 = 3 8 r − 4 .