x → 0 lim x 3 7 2 9 x − 2 4 3 x − 8 1 x + 9 x + 3 x − 1 = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Use "L'Hopital's Rule"
x → 0 lim x 3 7 2 9 x − 2 4 3 x − 8 1 x + 9 x + 3 x − 1
= x → 0 lim ⎝ ⎛ 3 x 2 3 x ( 3 x − 1 ) 2 ( 4 ⋅ 3 x + 2 ⋅ 3 3 x + 1 + 7 ⋅ 9 x + 1 ) ln ( 3 ) ⎠ ⎞
= x → 0 lim ⎝ ⎛ x 2 3 x − 1 ( 3 x − 1 ) 2 ( 4 ⋅ 3 x + 7 ⋅ 3 2 x + 2 ⋅ 3 3 x + 1 + 1 ) ln ( 3 ) ⎠ ⎞
= x → 0 lim ⎝ ⎛ 2 x 3 x − 1 ( 4 ⋅ 3 x + 4 ⋅ 3 5 x + 2 − 1 6 ⋅ 2 7 x − 2 5 ⋅ 8 1 x + 1 ) ln 2 ( 3 ) ⎠ ⎞
= x → 0 lim ⎝ ⎛ 2 x 3 x − 1 ( 4 ⋅ 3 x − 1 6 ⋅ 3 3 x − 2 5 ⋅ 3 4 x + 4 ⋅ 3 5 x + 2 + 1 ) ln 2 ( 3 ) ⎠ ⎞
= x → 0 lim ⎝ ⎛ 2 3 x − 1 ( 8 ⋅ 3 x + 8 ⋅ 3 5 x + 3 − 6 4 ⋅ 2 7 x − 1 2 5 ⋅ 8 1 x + 1 ) ln 3 ( 3 ) ⎠ ⎞
= x → 0 lim ⎝ ⎛ 2 3 x − 1 ( 8 ⋅ 3 x − 6 4 ⋅ 3 3 x − 1 2 5 ⋅ 3 4 x + 8 ⋅ 3 5 x + 3 + 1 ) ln 3 ( 3 ) ⎠ ⎞
= 2 3 0 − 1 ( 8 ⋅ 3 0 − 6 4 ⋅ 3 3 ( 0 ) − 1 2 5 ⋅ 3 4 ( 0 ) + 8 ⋅ 3 5 ( 0 ) + 3 + 1 ) ln 3 ( 3 )
= 6 ln 3 ( 3 )
Though a valid approach, your solution is unnecessarily long. Can you find a much simpler approach to this problem? Hints:
You're right about L'hopital Rule.
d x d ( a x ) = ln a ⋅ a x for a > 0 .
How many times do we need to apply L'H? Notice the denominator.
Express in terms of powers of 3 .
Bonus question: If the term x 3 is replaced by x , find the easiest way to solve this problem without resorting to L'hopital Rule.
Challenge Master: We need to differentiate 3 times.
So it's 6 1 × ( ( ln 7 2 9 ) 3 − ( ln 2 4 3 ) 3 − ( ln 8 1 ) 3 + ( ln 9 ) 3 + ( ln 3 ) 3 ) . Apply the logarithmic rule lo g a b c = c lo g a b and simplify, we would get the answer 6 ( ln 3 ) 3 .
Log in to reply
can you please show a clearer way to simplify the logs into 6ln(3)^3?
Sorry to bother you, but can you see anything wrong with my posted solution? I believe it is valid to partition the limit like this once we have shown that each component has a limit. Thanks. :)
Log in to reply
Haha don't need to apologize here!
It should be a > 0 because the function g ( x ) = x a x − 1 is not define for non-integer negative values of a . Though you don't need to invoke L'hopital rule in the first place, a simple first principle of derivative should have done the trick, that is considering the fact you have factorized it. And as long as you have partitioned your limit by not introducing multiplication / division of 0, then your limit is alright.
Unless you're taking complex numbers into account, I think your solution works fine. I'm surprised that the numerator could be factorized that way in the first place. And I thought this problem couldn't be solved without L'hopital rule. Kudos! +1
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Great! Thanks for checking over my solution. Good point about being able to avoid L'Hopital's rule entirely; I've made the appropriate edits. :)
@Pi Han Goh – Your statement "It should be a > 0 because the function g ( x ) = x a x − 1 is not define for non-integer negative values of a ." is not quite right in general, I'd say.
It is indeed defined even for a ≤ 0 . Hell, it's defined even for non-real complex values of a . The condition of a > 0 is appropriate if we're dealing exclusively with reals, i.e., considering g ( x ) to be a strictly real-valued function.
In general, the condition of a > 0 is not necessary.
The limit x → 0 lim x a x − 1 converges and equals ln ( a ) for all a ∈ C . You can confirm this using the Maclaurin series for a x which converges for all a ∈ C .
Log in to reply
@Prasun Biswas – I prefer to it keep it real. I don't like imaginary stuff.
[Response to Challenge Master Note]
For the bonus question, we can use an elementary limit which is x → 0 lim x a x − 1 = ln ( a ) .
Call the limit in the bonus question as L . We have,
L = x → 0 lim x 7 2 9 x − 2 4 3 x − 8 1 x + 9 x + 3 x − 1 = x → 0 lim x ( 7 2 9 x − 1 ) − ( 2 4 3 x − 1 ) − ( 8 1 x − 1 ) + ( 9 x − 1 ) + ( 3 x − 1 ) = x → 0 lim x 7 2 9 x − 1 − x → 0 lim x 2 4 3 x − 1 − x → 0 lim x 8 1 x − 1 + x → 0 lim x 9 x − 1 + x → 0 lim x 3 x − 1 = ln ( 7 2 9 ) − ln ( 2 4 3 ) − ln ( 8 1 ) + ln ( 9 ) + ln ( 3 ) = ln ( 3 6 ) − ln ( 3 5 ) − ln ( 3 4 ) + ln ( 3 2 ) + ln ( 3 ) = ( 6 − 5 − 4 + 2 + 1 ) ln ( 3 ) = 0
The proof for the elementary limit used is easily obtained using the Maclaurin series of a x which converges for all a ∈ C .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As an alternative, we could first factor the expression to obtain
lim x → 0 x 3 ( 3 x − 1 ) ( 3 2 x − 1 ) ( 3 3 x − 1 ) =
lim x → 0 ( ( x 3 x − 1 ) ( x 3 2 x − 1 ) ( x 3 3 x − 1 ) ) .
Now by the basic definition of the derivative we know that lim x → 0 x 3 a x − 1 is just the derivative of the function f ( y ) = 3 a y (with respect to y ) evaluated at y = 0 , which comes out to a ln ( 3 ) for real a > 0 .
and so our original limit becomes
( lim x → 0 x 3 x − 1 ) ( lim x → 0 x 3 2 x − 1 ) ( lim x → 0 x 3 3 x − 1 ) =
ln ( 3 ) × 2 ln ( 3 ) × 3 ln ( 3 ) = 6 ( ln ( 3 ) ) 3 .