Find the sum of the series

Calculus Level 3

1 1 + 1 1 + 2 + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + \frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{1+2}+\frac{1}{1+2+3}+\cdots

Find the value of the sum to 2 decimal places.


The answer is 2.00.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

7 solutions

Brian Moehring
Mar 3, 2017

Relevant wiki: Telescoping Series - Sum

Since 1 + 2 + 3 + + n = n ( n + 1 ) 2 1 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} the given infinite series has partial sums

n = 1 N 2 n ( n + 1 ) = n = 1 N ( 2 n 2 n + 1 ) = 2 1 2 N + 1 N 2. \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{2}{n(n+1)} = \sum_{n=1}^N \left(\frac{2}{n} - \frac{2}{n+1}\right) = \frac{2}{1} - \frac{2}{N+1} \xrightarrow{N\rightarrow\infty} 2.

May I know the steps to how from n(n+1)/2 when inserted in infinite series it became 2/n(n+1)? Thanks!

Sara Ho - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

The n n th term in the series is 1 1 + 2 + 3 + + n \frac{1}{1 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n} .

If 1 + 2 + 3 + + n = n ( n + 1 ) 2 1 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} , then what is 1 1 + 2 + 3 + + n \dfrac{1}{1 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n} ?

Pranshu Gaba - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

okay it makes sense now... thanks!

Sara Ho - 4 years, 2 months ago

I used the same fact but made it somewhat harder for my self to prove that the sum equal 2 n n + 1 \frac{2n}{n+1} which gives 2 for n near infinity.

Peter van der Linden - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

How about you post your solution?

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I actually did this while trying to get to sleep without any paper... So i can try and post it later on again.

Peter van der Linden - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Peter van der Linden I am looking forward to that

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 4 years, 3 months ago

Can someone explain 2/n(n+1)=2/n-2/n+1?

joshua ennis - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

The fraction 1 n ( n + 1 ) \frac{1}{n(n+1)} can be written as ( n + 1 ) n n ( n + 1 ) \frac{ (n + 1) - n}{n (n+1)} . Do you see how to proceed from here?

Pranshu Gaba - 4 years, 2 months ago

I couldn't understand a thing..please try and make things more clear..thanks

Fgh Fggccfcv - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Where are you lost? What are you struggling with?

The question asked us to find the value of the series, which can be found via partial fractions accompanied by telescoping sum.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago

Why we should 1+2+3...........+n and be n(n+1)/2?

Kexin Khoo - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

This result is proved in the sum of n, n², or n³ wiki. You may read the wiki to see how the expression is derived.

Pranshu Gaba - 4 years, 2 months ago

But the sum of the first 3 terms already adds up to 2: 1 + 1/3 + 1/6 = 2. Wouldn't the next terms increase the series?

Francis Kong - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

1 + 1 3 + 1 6 = 1.5 1 + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{6} = 1.5

Brian Moehring - 3 years, 8 months ago
Viki Zeta
Mar 13, 2017

Let a n refer the n-th term in the above sequence of sum a 1 = 1 = 2 2 2 a 2 = 1 3 = 2 2 2 3 a 3 = 1 6 = 2 3 2 4 a n = 2 n 2 n + 1 Add up all those, till n S = 2 2 2 + 2 2 2 3 + 2 3 2 4 + + 2 n 2 n + 1 S = 2 + ( 0 + 0 + 0 + + 0 + 0 ) Since, 1 = 0 S = 2 \text{Let }a_n \text{ refer the n-th term in the above sequence of sum} \\ a_1 = 1 = 2 - \dfrac{2}{2} \\ a_2 = \dfrac{1}{3} = \dfrac{2}{2} - \dfrac{2}{3} \\ a_3 = \dfrac{1}{6} = \dfrac{2}{3} - \dfrac{2}{4} \\ \large \ldots \\ a_n = \dfrac{2}{n} - \dfrac{2}{n+1} \\ \text{Add up all those, till } n \rightarrow \infty \\ S = 2 - \dfrac{2}{2} + \dfrac{2}{2} - \dfrac{2}{3} + \dfrac{2}{3} - \dfrac{2}{4} + \ldots + \dfrac{2}{n} - \dfrac{2}{n+1} \\ S = 2 + \left(0 + 0 + 0 + \ldots + 0 + 0\right) ~ \boxed{\text{Since, }\dfrac{1}{\infty} = 0} \\ S = 2

This approach is valid, but unfortunately, not rigorous. We cannot really take n = n = \infty . Can we? The sequence is only defined for elements in N \mathbb{N} . Also, what does it mean to divide 1 1 by \infty . \infty is not a real number.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

As n n approaches \infty ,

lim n 1 n = 0 \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \dfrac{1}{n} = 0

Viki Zeta - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

This is not the proper solution to show that the series converges to 2.

The proper way to do it is, is to show that the partial sum converges to 2. Setting n= infty is not the proper math notation.

Plus, you didn't explain why a(n) = 2/n - 2/(n+1) for all n=1,2,3,4,5,....

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Yeah but that was the fastest way

Viki Zeta - 4 years, 2 months ago

Shouldn't the answer be 1.9 repeating as we will never actually reach 2?

Blake Richardson - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

1.9 repeating is equal to 2.

Read up Is 0.999... = 1? .

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago

This sum will never be 2 in Real time. So the answer shoukd be 1.99. Am i wrong?

Hasan İşlek - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

What do you mean by "real time"? The answer is equal to 1.99 if the sum is 1 1 + 1 1 + 2 + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + + 199 . \frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{1+2}+\frac{1}{1+2+3}+\cdots + \frac1{1+2+3+\cdots+199}. .

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

yes it will always be 1.99999999 never 2 unless we take infinite terms. :)

Rachit Pulhani - 4 years, 2 months ago

it will be 2 if terms as infinite if u take a biliion terms it is 1.99999 the limit of this is 2 as u take infinite terms it becomes 2 any less terms and answer is extremely close to 2 like 1.9999999999..

Rachit Pulhani - 4 years, 2 months ago

The limit tends to 2 as number of terms goes to infinity. This means that we can get as close as we want to 2 by adding sufficiently many terms.

Pranshu Gaba - 4 years, 2 months ago

Yes, I think you are right. Maybe the question should have asked the limit of the infinite sum as n approaches infinity rather than the actual sum of these terms.

Daniel Xian - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

There's a \cdots at the end of the expression, so it means that there are infinitely many terms.

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 6 months ago
Michael Nasti
Mar 15, 2017

1 1 + 1 1 + 2 + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . = 1 1 2 2 + 1 2 3 2 + 1 3 4 2 + . . . = 2 ( 1 1 2 + 1 2 3 + 1 3 4 + . . . ) = 2 ( 2 1 1 2 + 3 2 2 3 + 4 3 3 4 + . . . ) = 2 ( 2 1 2 1 1 2 + 3 2 3 2 2 3 + 4 3 4 3 3 4 + . . . ) = 2 ( 1 1 1 2 + 1 2 1 3 + 1 3 1 4 + . . . ) = 2 ( 1 1 ) = 2 \dfrac{1}{1}+\dfrac{1}{1+2}+\dfrac{1}{1+2+3}+...\\ = \dfrac{1}{\frac{1 \cdot 2}{2}}+\dfrac{1}{\frac{2 \cdot 3}{2}}+\dfrac{1}{\frac{3 \cdot 4}{2}}+...\\ = 2(\dfrac{1}{1 \cdot 2}+\dfrac{1}{2 \cdot 3}+\dfrac{1}{3 \cdot 4}+...)\\ = 2(\dfrac{2-1}{1 \cdot 2}+\dfrac{3-2}{2 \cdot 3}+\dfrac{4-3}{3 \cdot 4}+...)\\ = 2(\dfrac{2}{1 \cdot 2}-\dfrac{1}{1 \cdot 2}+\dfrac{3}{2 \cdot 3}-\dfrac{2}{2 \cdot 3}+\dfrac{4}{3 \cdot 4}-\dfrac{3}{3 \cdot 4}+...)\\ = 2(\dfrac{1}{1}-\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{2}-\dfrac{1}{3}+\dfrac{1}{3}-\dfrac{1}{4}+...)\\ = 2(\dfrac{1}{1})\\ = 2

Nice solution. I think it is worthwhile mentioning that the sum of first n natural numbers is n ( n + 1 ) 2 \frac{n(n+1)}{2} and actually explaining what the \cdots notation actually reflects.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 4 years, 2 months ago

Smart answer!

Zhi Yang Marcus - 4 years, 2 months ago

Nice algebraic manipulation!

Mohammad Hasan - 4 years, 2 months ago
James Pigg
Mar 13, 2017

for k=500..10000 by 500
{
set sum to 0
for i=1..k by 1
{
set den to 0
set num to 1
for j=1..i by 1
{
change den by j
}
change sum by (num/den)
}
print sum
}





// observe convergence for large n to 2

This is wrong. You have only shown that the series is approximately equal to 2, but you didn't show that the series is exactly equal to 2.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago
Ashwin K
Apr 18, 2017

In these problems, generalizing the series helps a lot.

denominator is nothing but sum to 'n' terms.

Then, we get, 2 n ( n + 1 ) \frac{2}{n(n+1)}

When we have product of 2 terms in denominator, splitting them into 2 individual terms helps most of the time.

So, we get 2 n 2 n + 1 \frac{2}{n}-\frac{2}{n+1} and n ranges from 1 to inf.

If we expand the series above, we get first term 2 and last term as (2/inf) and middle terms all cancels out.

We will get the final answer as 2 \boxed{2}

Hunter Edwards
Mar 16, 2017

1 + 2 + 3 + • • • + n = n( n + 1)/2 Simple, really.

Your solution is not clear. What does this formula have to do with the problem?

Christopher Boo - 4 years, 2 months ago
Hristo Krastevski
Mar 15, 2017

My Java implementation:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
double j = 0;
double p = 0;
for (double i = 1; i < 2000; i++) {
    j += 1 / (p + i);
    p += i;
}
System.out.println(Math.round(j));

This is a good start to guess if the numerical value of the limit.

However, you have only shown that the nearest integer to 1 1 + 1 1 + 2 + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + + 1 1 + 2 + 3 + + 1999 \frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{1+2}+\frac{1}{1+2+3}+\cdots + \dfrac1{1+2+3+\cdots+1999} is 2, which is different from what the question is asking.

Proving that the series is EXACTLY equal to 2 is not the same as proving that the sum of the first 1999 terms of this series is approximately 2.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...