What is the value of 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ⋯ ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Your solution say first option is the answer.
but of course you are right.
Could somebody please help me rewrite this solution? I understand the concept but could not explain it well :(
Log in to reply
You may refer to the wiki I wrote: LINK
Log in to reply
Thank you VERY much and now I feel very clear about it!
Log in to reply
@Margaret Zheng – No worries , it was my pleasure :)
Did u c the video that numberphile posted on their channel on YouTube..https://youtu.be/PCu_BNNI5x4...above is the link..please explain this 2.. @Calvin Lin
I am not getting the option of writing the answer on brilliant.org, hence I am writing in the comment reply.
I would like to write a Note on this question and answrs,
1+1+1+1+1-1-1+1+1-1-1+1+1-1-1+1+1.......
and same way you can set that series in such a way that it can accumulate to other digits also.
Grandi Series: Surprisingly nobody has mentioned Grandi series, this question is a Grandi series, probably @Righved K has mentioned about the Youtube channel Numberphile video hence that video has given the details of the Grandi series. In year 1703 Italian mathematician Grandi has proved that 1-1+1-1+1....... = 1/2 and it has been accepted by the mathematicians and have been used to prove other theories and other proofs hence this answer can not be denied.
Current Question & its options: Now if I have above both facts I can not deny the option 1/2, which is given in the option of the question, hence person who choose that -The series does not converge and -1/2 are both true, because both are proven things.
Hence now question itself creates confusion, All given answers are correct in their term.
Option - 1 : It accumulates at 1-That is true, if you rearrange in one way.
Option - 0 : It accumulate at 0-That is also true, if we arrange the numbers in other way.
Option - The series does not converge : That is also true, No doubt
Option - 1/2 : That is also true, If you go by Grandi's series.
So, I am not understanding why this question and its option are given in such a way. Moreover this question with this options are not a candidate of MCQ questions. It is a Subjective question, more discussion type.
Log in to reply
Imran is correct - this is Grandi's series. It is, counterintuitively, both a divergent series and one that sums to 1/2. Both answers are correct.
Log in to reply
Congrats Christopher, you have understanding of this concept!!!!
S=1-(1-1+1-1...)=1-S is S=1-0=1-S. S=1=1-S If S is one half, 1/2=1=1/2 Not same
There is not given that the series is infinit or any more.. thats why u can't say s=1-s
Let A=1-1+1-1+1-1+....... Add -1 both side A-1= -1+(1-1+1-1+1-1+....) A-1=0-1+1-1+1-1+..... A-1= -(1-1+1-1+1-1+....) A-1= -A 2A=1 A=1/2 1-1+1-1+......=1/2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As this summation grows, its value forms another series: 1,0,1,0,1,0,1... This series does not have any limit, thus the summation does not converge.