Finite Quantum Well (Part 1)

A particle in a one-dimensional quantum well is governed by a variant of the time-independent Schrodinger equation, expressed in terms of wave function Ψ ( x ) \Psi (x) .

The quantities V V and E E are the potential energy and total energy, respectively.

d 2 d x 2 Ψ ( x ) + V ( x ) Ψ ( x ) = E Ψ ( x ) -\frac{d^2}{d x^2} \, \Psi (x) + V(x) \, \Psi (x) = E \, \Psi (x)

The potential varies as follows:

V ( x ) = 1 x < 1 V ( x ) = 0 1 x 1 V ( x ) = 1 x > 1 V (x) = 1 \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, x < -1 \\ V (x) = 0 \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, -1 \leq x \leq 1 \\ V (x) = 1 \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, x > 1

Assume that the wave function must satisfy the following constraints:

1) The wave function and its spatial derivative must be continuous for all x x
2) The integral of the squared modulus of the wave function over all space must be finite
3) The wave function must be even (ex: Ψ ( x ) = Ψ ( x ) ) \Psi(x) = \Psi(-x))

Given the constraints, what is the smallest allowable energy E E for this system?

Note: It also looks to me like this is the only E E value which satisfies the constraints


The answer is 0.546247.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Mark Hennings
Sep 21, 2019

Note that Ψ = ( 1 E ) Ψ \Psi'' = (1-E)\Psi for x > 1 |x| > 1 . Since Ψ \Psi is square-integrable, we deduce that E < 1 E < 1 , so that E = 1 k 2 E = 1-k^2 for some k > 0 k > 0 . But then Ψ = k 2 Ψ \Psi'' = k^2\Psi for x > 1 |x| > 1 , while Ψ + ( 1 k 2 ) Ψ = 0 \Psi'' + (1-k^2)\Psi = 0 for x < 1 |x| < 1 . Since Ψ \Psi is even, we must have Ψ ( x ) = { A e k x x > 1 B cos ( 1 k 2 x ) x < 1 \Psi(x) \; = \; \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} Ae^{-k|x|} & \hspace{1cm} & |x| > 1 \\ B\cos(\sqrt{1-k^2}x) & & |x| < 1 \end{array}\right. Since both Ψ \Psi and Ψ \Psi' must be continuous, we deduce that A e k = B cos ( 1 k 2 ) k A e k = B 1 k 2 sin ( 1 k 2 ) Ae^{-k} \; = \; B\cos(\sqrt{1-k^2}) \hspace{2cm} kAe^{-k} \; = \; B\sqrt{1-k^2} \sin(\sqrt{1-k^2}) and these conditions allow for nonzero solutions A , B A,B provided that 0 < k < 1 0 < k < 1 and k = 1 k 2 tan ( 1 k 2 ) k \; = \; \sqrt{1-k^2}\tan(\sqrt{1-k^2}) so that 0 < E < 1 0 < E < 1 and 1 E = E tan E \sqrt{1-E} \; = \; \sqrt{E}\tan\sqrt{E} Solving this equation numerically, we find that the only solution to this equation is E = 0.546247 E = \boxed{0.546247} .

I analyzed the equation in a similar way and deduced that the form of the solution outside the interval 1 x 1 -1 \le x\le 1 must be a decreasing exponential. Matching the boundary conditions at the point of potential discontinuity leads to the answer. This bit is fine. What I did was go the numerical route as well. I tried an arbitrary set of boundary conditions (I would have said initial conditions if the independent variable was time) and solved the equation using the value of energy obtained and I see that the wave function diverges.

I think this is because the general solution to the equation when E < 1 E<1 and when x > 1 \mid x \mid >1 is:

ψ = c 1 e ( 1 E ) x + c 2 e ( 1 E ) x \psi = c_1 e^{(1-E)x} + c_2 e^{-(1-E)x}

Assuming that the general solution is only a decreasing exponential just does not seem to be a very rigorous approach to the problem. I would like to know your thoughts on this @Mark Hennings @Steven Chase

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

We are looking fo what are called bound state solutions , namely ones for which the function Ψ \Psi is square-integrable. Square-integrability tells us that the most general solution of the differential equation must be of the form Ψ = { A e 1 E x x > 1 B cos E x + C sin E x 1 < x < 1 D e 1 E x x < 1 \Psi = \left\{\begin{array}{lll} A e^{-\sqrt{1-E}x} & \hspace{1cm} & x>1\\ B \cos\sqrt{E}x + C\sin\sqrt{E}x & & -1<x<1\\ D e^{\sqrt{1-E}x} && x<-1 \end{array}\right. with E < 1 E<1 . If E > 1 E>1 then Ψ \Psi would be oscillatory for large x x , and we would not get square-integrability. We could apply continuity of Ψ \Psi and its derivative at 1 1 and 1 -1 to find the relationships between A , B , C A,B,C and D D , and also derive an equation that E E must satisfy so that the only solution is not just A = B = C = D = 0 A=B=C=D=0 .

This question makes things a bit easier by looking for even solutions.

However, the important assumption is square-integrability, which is a standard requirement of QM.

A different family of solutions would occur when E > 1 E>1 , and Ψ \Psi would be linear combinations of e ± i x E 1 e^{\pm ix\sqrt{E-1}} for x > 1 |x|>1 . These equations would model beams of electrons of fixed momentum either being reflected by or transmitted through the potential well of the problem.

Mark Hennings - 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mark Hennings Sir can you please upload the solution of https://brilliant.org/problems/two-rings-attracting/ with a understandable explanation as always. Please sir. Your solution of every complex question impresses me. Please?

A Former Brilliant Member - 1 year, 7 months ago

Indeed, as Mark said, the growing exponential term outside the well has to be thrown out to ensure that the integral of Ψ 2 |\Psi|^2 is finite

Steven Chase - 1 year, 8 months ago

Thank you for the comments. My knowledge of QM is low but these exercises are helping me to build on it. So is there a way to numerically ensure that the solution has a finite L2 norm? I ask this as I could not validate the result by simply numerically solving the diff equation.

Karan Chatrath - 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

For the infinite well, we could disregard the requirement for continuity in the derivative, since that would force trivial solutions ( Ψ = 0 \Psi = 0 everywhere). It was also virtually guaranteed that the integral of Ψ 2 |\Psi|^2 would be finite, due to the finite integration interval. So the brute numerical methods worked very well for that case. Here, I believe it is much more difficult to brute search for a solution. Consequently, I did most of this one analytically.

Steven Chase - 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase Solving for bound state solutions and/or electron beam solutions for piecewise constant potentials is a standard part of any course in QM...

Mark Hennings - 1 year, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...