Fire up the hill

You have a potato cannon, located 30 m from the start of a hill. The hill is inclined at θ = π / 6 \theta = \pi/6 radians, and your cannon fires potatoes with v 0 = 40 v_0 = 40 m/s. If you want to hit a target located 80 m up the hill (measured along the hill), what is the smallest angle, ϕ min \phi_\text{min} , to which you can set your cannon (in radians)?

Details

  • g = 9.81 g = 9.81 m/s


The answer is 0.800372.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Suppose that you and your potato gun are at the origin of a standard x y xy -grid. The base of the hill is then at ( 30 , 0 ) , (30,0), (measured in meters), and the target is at

( X , Y ) = ( 30 + 80 cos ( π 6 ) , 80 sin ( π 6 ) ) = ( 30 + 40 3 , 40 ) . (X,Y) = (30 + 80\cos(\frac{\pi}{6}), 80\sin(\frac{\pi}{6})) = (30 + 40\sqrt{3}, 40).

The equations of motion of the potato projectile are then

x = v 0 cos ( ϕ ) t x = v_{0}\cos(\phi)t and y = v 0 sin ( ϕ ) t g 2 t 2 , y = v_{0}\sin(\phi)t - \dfrac{g}{2}t^{2},

where t = 0 t = 0 s at the time of launch and ϕ \phi is the launch angle. Substituting t = x v 0 cos ( ϕ ) t = \dfrac{x}{v_{0}\cos(\phi)} into the equation for y y and simplifying yields

y = x tan ( ϕ ) g x 2 2 v 0 2 ( tan 2 ( ϕ ) + 1 ) , y = x\tan(\phi) - \dfrac{gx^{2}}{2v_{0}^{2}}(\tan^{2}(\phi) + 1),

which when rewritten as a quadratic in tan ( ϕ ) \tan(\phi) becomes

g x 2 2 v 0 2 tan 2 ( ϕ ) x tan ( ϕ ) + ( g x 2 2 v 0 2 + y ) = 0 \dfrac{gx^{2}}{2v_{0}^{2}}\tan^{2}(\phi) - x\tan(\phi) + \left(\dfrac{gx^{2}}{2v_{0}^{2}} + y\right) = 0

tan ( ϕ ) = x ± x 2 4 g x 2 2 v 0 2 ( g x 2 2 v 0 2 + y ) g x 2 v 0 2 . \Longrightarrow \tan(\phi) = \dfrac{x \pm \sqrt{x^{2} - 4\dfrac{gx^{2}}{2v_{0}^{2}}\left(\dfrac{gx^{2}}{2v_{0}^{2}} + y\right)}}{\dfrac{gx^{2}}{v_{0}^{2}}}.

Plugging in x = X = 30 + 40 3 m , y = Y = 40 m , g = 9.81 m s 2 x = X = 30 + 40\sqrt{3} m, y = Y = 40 m, g = 9.81 \frac{m}{s^{2}} and v 0 = 40 m s v_{0} = 40 \frac{m}{s} gives us that

tan ( ϕ ) = 99.282 ± 37.176 60.3736 , \tan(\phi) = \dfrac{99.282 \pm 37.176}{60.3736},

and since we want to find the minimum possible launch angle we choose the - sign, yielding tan ( ϕ m i n ) = 1.0287 ϕ m i n = 0.7995 \tan(\phi_{min}) = 1.0287 \Longrightarrow \phi_{min} = \boxed{0.7995} radians.

Formula for answers is checked to be correct. Just the answer of 0.800372139477866 and 1.153421728742480 are not presented accurately.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

You're right. I recalculated to 8 decimal places and found that tan ( ϕ m i n ) = 1.03040552 , \tan(\phi_{min}) = 1.03040552, resulting in a value of ϕ m i n = 0.80037214 \phi_{min} = 0.80037214 radians, in agreement with your calculation to 8 decimal places. Since both this value and the posted answer of 0.7995 0.7995 radians are equal to 0.800 0.800 to 3 decimal places I don't think that the posted answer needs to be changed, since 3 decimal place accuracy is the generally allowed norm on this site.

However, if the question had asked for the value of, say, 10000 ϕ m i n , \lfloor 10000*\phi_{min} \rfloor, then the correct answer would have been 8003 8003 and not 7995 , 7995, in which case the calculation would have required more than 3 decimal place accuracy to obtain the correct answer.

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Hope I am not against purpose of keeping the answer confidential. So, the system shall have a default of taking 3 decimal places for every time not mentioned with specification. First time to know from you. Thanks.

Actually, we have slight problem to implement with the instrument as shown to start with. The starting portion of projectile become theoretical rather than practical. Nevertheless, we are doing mathematics rather than practice.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 7 months ago

Same solution. :)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

It is a wonder to me how you do it at 14!

Titas Biswas - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

I am a JEE aspirant , it is expected that I know all this at 14.

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Well,according to me what you are aspiring for is not a very big factor.For example,Calvin Lin is interested in Game Theory and Economics and I have a feeling that he can solve absolutely anything,any sum on the planet.It is about the zeal to learn that counts.Anyhow,merit appreciated.

Titas Biswas - 5 years, 10 months ago

@Nihar Mahajan Yup! High five!

Kishore S. Shenoy - 5 years, 9 months ago
Lu Chee Ket
Oct 25, 2015

Adjusted from most efficient of 54.4810315807003 degrees down to 45.8579456319378 degrees such that 0.800372139477866 radians. If a tall height of 1.5 m is considered in, then 44.7448867282823 degrees! Substitutions of time factors to eliminate time for equation of Sine and Cosine of angle of elevation, numerical substitution shall be easiest to obtain the angle without sorting out Cosine value or Sine value; not solving the equation really. Every item can be checked using Excel to confirm for logical correctness. 66.0861970556276 degrees is another greater one which shall take much more time, changed from 3.56391341736003 s to 6.12305020909730 s of higher peak.

Answer: 0.800372139477866

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...