Find the largest positive integer n such that we can fit a conic through any n points in R 2 .
Clarification : A conic is a curve in R 2 given by an equation of the form c 1 + c 2 x + c 3 y + c 4 x 2 + c 5 x y + c 6 y 2 = 0 , where at least one of the coefficients c k is nonzero.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
What's that ccomputation?
Log in to reply
The coefficients of 1, x , and x 2 must be zero since the curve runs through ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 1 , 0 ) , ( 2 , 0 ) . Likewise the coefficients of y and y 2 must be zero since the curve runs through ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 ) , ( 0 , 2 ) . Finally the coefficient of x y must be zero since the curve runs through ( 1 , 1 ) . Thus there is no such conic.
@Otto Bretscher Sir, could you please help me out and think about this........if we have 5 arbitrary non collinear points A,B,C,D and E......and now, the lines joining A-B , B-C , C-D , D-A are named L1 = 0 , L2 = 0 , L3 = 0 , and L4 = 0 respectively, we find that the general equation of the conic is (L1) (L3) + a (L2)*(L4) = 0............where a is a constant determined by the fifth point given to us..................Does this approach work??? Or did I just get lucky???
Log in to reply
Yes, this approach works for conics. Can you generalise the method to cubics and curves of even higher order?
Log in to reply
Well Sir, I tried and found out that for a cubic and a quartic, 9 and 14 points are needed.....(quartic took a bit of time!!)......so, if the general pattern holds, I think that for a degree n curve, a minimum of n*(n+3)/2 points are needed........I still need to prove whether the pattern holds tho.......!!!
Log in to reply
@Aaghaz Mahajan – The customary way to do this, at least since the time of Euler, is by solving linear equations (that's the approach I took in my solution). Since the equation of a curve of degree n contains 2 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) parameters, you can always fit an n th degree curve through one fewer points since you have fewer homogeneous linear equations than unknowns.
To make the solution complete, you also have to provide an example of 2 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) points in the plane through which you cannot but a curve (six points in the case of a conic).
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – @Otto Bretscher Yes Sir!!!!! I took the same approach which you have stated here.......!!! I was just confused whether this is a good method or not......because, even I found 9 points for a cubic by making linear equations......!! But I am so happy right now!!! Thanks a lot sir!!! :)
Also, the example for 6 points in a plane can be found very easily, so all in all the solution is completed!!!
Log in to reply
@Aaghaz Mahajan – Well, show us how you find the six points, please, just to make the solution complete.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Well sir, this was my approach..............We see that a conic needs 5 things to be determined exactly, viz. Eccentricity, Scaling factor, Rotation, absicca and the ordinate of the center..........So, 5 points will suffice to find a conic.......Now, if we take any 5 points lying on a conic, we can select the sixth point not lying on it, which won't give an equation for the curve........
Log in to reply
@Aaghaz Mahajan – This works only if we know that there is only one conic through the five points.
I agree that in the simple case of a conic this is all pretty obvious, but it gets more interesting in the case of a cubic. How many cubics run through nine given points? My country man Euler and Cramer had a spirited discussion about that issue ("Cramer's Paradox"), which contributed a lot to the development of linear algebra. See here
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – @Otto Bretscher Yes Sir, I agree!!!! And I read about Cramer's theorem and Cramer's paradoz after your reply!!
Sir, on the other hand, can I ask you for a small favor??? Could you share your email??? As I have some doubts regarding mathematical papers.........You see, I saw that you are a professor and also, you have published books, so I thought I could take your help.........Please tell me whether I should communicate further on email or this website only........Thanks in anticipation!!
Log in to reply
@Aaghaz Mahajan – Yes, of course, feel free to write at otto@post.harvard.edu . If we are addressing specific questions related to Brilliant, it may be better to write here, so that others can participate.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Thank you Sir........I have sent you an email...........!!
@Otto Bretscher – Umm.... Sir???
Is the formula correct tho??? I mean, is this problem solved by someone already??
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If we plug n points into the given formula of a conic, we end up with n homogeneous linear equations in 6 variables, c 1 , . . . , c 6 . If n < 6 , we have more variables than equations, and there will be non-trivial solutions (with at least one of the c k being nonzero), thus giving us a conic through 5 or fewer points.
However, a little computation shows that it is impossible to fit a conic through the 6 points ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 1 , 0 ) , ( 2 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 ) , ( 0 , 2 ) and ( 1 , 1 ) .
Thus the answer is 5 .