For positive coprime integers a and b are such that
∫ 0 1 x 2 0 1 8 ( ln x ) 2 d x = b 3 a
Find a + b .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Priyanshu Mishra , you forgot the d x for the integral. Don't use { ⋅ } . It can be confused as fractional part function. You still have not change the way you enter LaTex. I think you are using the editor. There are far too many { }, which are unnecessary. Why do need a space () after \large. When you are using the square brackets \ [ \ ], you don't need to use \displaystyle or \dfrac. Don't need to use \left( \right) when there is only one layer of text else the brackets are unnecessarily big.
I have changed your LaTex codes and question wording. You can actually see the LaTex codes by placing your mouse cursor on top of the formulas or click the pull-down menu " ⋯ More" under the answer section and select "Toggle LaTex". Check how few { } I have used. You can also check how I enter my solution.
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong , Thanks sir for correction. Now onwards I will try to write the codes on my own (without editor). But when the codes are too much like in this problem “London Mathematical Society!” By me, I am bound to use editor. So can you please suggest how to write it myself when the coding uses too many inner brackets?
Log in to reply
You can use this editor Daum Equation Editor but just to learn the codes. I also google to get the codes that I want. I disagree with you. I don't think there are many expressions that are tough to code. If I am like you how am I going to write long solutions. LaTex is designed to save keystrokes for example \frac 12 2 1 , \binom nk ( k n ) , \int_0^\frac \pi 2 ∫ 0 2 π . You only use { } only when necessary. For example, \frac {12}5 5 1 2 , \frac \pi {21} 2 1 π , \frac {23}{32} 3 2 2 3 .
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – ok now I understood the motto behind using LaTex code. I will do the same as asked by you.
Feynman's trick makes use of the
Liebniz Rule of Integration
, more often than not the specific case
d
t
d
∫
a
b
f
(
x
,
t
)
d
x
=
∫
a
b
∂
t
∂
f
(
x
,
t
)
d
x
where
a
and
b
are
not
functions of
t
. So the technique makes use of defining useful multi-variable integrals. First we must notice that
∂
t
∂
x
t
=
ln
(
x
)
x
t
,
∂
t
∂
ln
(
x
)
x
t
=
ln
2
(
x
)
x
t
.
So if we let
I
denote the integral in question, and
f
(
t
)
=
∫
0
1
x
t
d
x
then the second derivative of
f
evaluated at
t
=
2
0
1
8
will give us the value of the original integral
I
:
I
=
f
′
′
(
2
0
1
8
)
=
∂
t
2
∂
2
∣
∣
∣
t
=
2
0
1
8
∫
0
1
x
t
d
x
=
(
t
+
1
)
3
2
∣
∣
∣
t
=
2
0
1
8
=
2
0
1
9
3
2
b
3
a
=
2
0
1
9
3
2
∴
a
+
b
=
2
0
2
1
.
The twist is that usually one finds an integral that is easier to re-integrate back into an equivalent form of the original integral as a function of
t
, but in this case we find that an integral partial differentiated twice is equivalent to the original integral.
Let I ( t ) = ∫ 0 1 x t d x = ( t + 1 ) 1
Hence I ′ ′ ( t ) = ∫ 0 1 x t ( ln x ) 2 d x = ( t + 1 ) 3 2
Put t = 2 0 1 8 to get a = 2 and b = 2 0 1 9
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Gamma function & Factorial
I = ∫ 0 1 x 2 0 1 8 ln 2 x d x = ∫ − ∞ 0 e 2 0 1 9 u u 2 d u = ∫ 0 ∞ 2 0 1 9 3 t 2 e − t d t = 2 0 1 9 3 Γ ( 3 ) = 2 0 1 9 3 2 Let u = ln x ⟹ e u = x ⟹ e u d u = d x Let t = − 2 0 1 9 u ⟹ d t = − 2 0 1 9 d u Gamma function Γ ( z ) = ∫ 0 ∞ t z − 1 e − t d t Note that Γ ( n ) = ( n − 1 ) !
Therefore, a + b = 2 + 2 0 1 9 = 2 0 2 1 .