Fluids in Action.

A U-tube has vertical arms of radii R R and 2 R 2R . The left arm has radius R , R, and the right one 2 R , 2R, connected by a horizontal tube of length L L whose radius increases from R R to 2 R 2R linearly.

The U-tube contains liquid up to height H H in each arm. The liquid is set oscillating by giving the left arm ( ( the one with radius R ) R) a small displacement of y y . Find the time period (in seconds) of oscillations of the fluid, if 2 L = 5 H 2L=5H with H = 20 m H=20 \text{ m} and the liquid doesn't pile up anywhere.


Source: MIT introductory physics course


The answer is 12.5663.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Sumanth R Hegde
Mar 10, 2017

Consider the system when liquid on left end is displaced by a small distance x x . Calculate the potential energy of the system ( it is convenient to assume the base level to be at zero Potential) . We get

U = 5 ρ g π R 2 x 2 8 + C \displaystyle U = \dfrac{ 5 \rho g \pi R^2 x^2 }{ 8} + C where C C is a constant.

Now to evaluate the kinetic energy :

It is mentioned that the liquid doesn't " pile up" anywhere . So , for the movement of the liquid in the horizontal part of the tube, apply equation of continuity . The total kinetic energy of the liquid comes out to be

K = ρ π R 2 ( L + 5 h 2 ) v 2 4 \displaystyle K = \dfrac{ \rho \pi R^2 ( L + \frac{5h}{2} ) v^2} {4} , where v v is the velocity of liquid in left end of the rod .

( Hints to evaluating the kinetic energy :

First evaluate kinetic energy of the liquid in horizontal part by taking a small element of length d x dx at a distance x x from left end of the rod and integrate . Now, evaluate the kinetic energy of the liquid in the vertical sections and add them up to get tge total kinetic energy. )

Total energy is constant ,that is ,

U + K = c o n s t a n t \displaystyle U + K = constant

Differentiate the above equation wrt time to get

a = 5 g x 2 ( L + 5 h 2 ) a = \dfrac{ -5 g x }{ 2( L + \frac{5h}{2} ) } , where a a is the acceleration of the liquid in the left end .

Comparing with the standard equation for S . H . M \color{#3D99F6}{ S.H.M } ,

ω = 5 g 2 ( L + 5 h 2 ) \omega = \sqrt{ \dfrac{ 5g }{ 2( L + \frac{5h}{2} ) } } .

Substituting L = 5 h 2 L = \dfrac{ 5h}{2} , time period of oscillations comes out to be

T = 2 π 2 h g = 12.5663 \displaystyle \color{#D61F06}{ T = 2 \pi \sqrt{ \dfrac{2h}{ g} } = 12.5663 }

@Spandan Senapati . Do mention the value of g g

Sumanth R Hegde - 4 years, 3 months ago

Ya exactly same here.I too did the same.BTW in which class are you??

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Currently in 12th

Sumanth R Hegde - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

You gave inpho this yr??Selected??

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Spandan Senapati Nope :( . I did very bad. Couldnt manage time and made some trivial errors

Sumanth R Hegde - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Sumanth R Hegde I too.I had done a lot modern physics and you know that only 1 mod physics q came.(only 3mk)Have one more chance nxt yr.

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Spandan Senapati Btw, Congrats for getting an awesome rank in kvpy!

Sumanth R Hegde - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Sumanth R Hegde Oh thanks...I expected a rank in the top 50...Again Thanks a ton.

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 2 months ago

@Sumanth R Hegde Congrats tonyou as well...You too have an awesome rank.Best of luck for Jee

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Spandan Senapati Thank you :p

Sumanth R Hegde - 4 years, 2 months ago

Try another related problem"Seiche"

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 3 months ago

Hey @Spandan Senapati @Sumanth R Hegde , I have a doubt. Why can't we use force method here?? I did using that first and got a wrong answer. Thanks!

Thomas Jacob - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Long time no brilliant. There aren't any subtle issues with the force analysis method here.Youre used,mainly used to using force analysis in case of Bent u-tube systems where the cross sectional area is mainly constant,or simple U-Tubes where speed of each part of fluid is same and therby their displacement.But here the displacements differ for each part of the horizontal tube so if you're thinking abt using F N = M Ω 2 x F_{N}=-M\Omega ^2x decide at first what's the x x you will set it simply isn't the displacement of either end.

Spandan Senapati - 3 years, 3 months ago

In retrospect you can do that as well,but then consider W m g = d m Ω 2 x W_{mg}=\int dm \Omega ^2 x , the first quantity denoted the restoring weight and the second consider it as a sort of loop integral evaluated throughout the fluid. In idealiy both energy conservation and the above method are the same, just that energy conservation is more powerful a tool in situation like these where it's easy to be get confused by force analysis.

Spandan Senapati - 3 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...