Focused Electric Field

In the x y xy plane, there is a parabola described by y = x 2 y = x^{2} . The parabola has a uniform linear charge density σ \sigma .

The magnitude of the electric field at the focus of the parabola can be expressed as a b k σ \dfrac{a}{b}k\sigma , where k k is the Coulomb constant and a a and b b are coprime positive integers .

Determine a + b a+b .


The answer is 19.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Steven Chase
Aug 18, 2016

Recall that d E y = k d q r 2 cos θ dE_y = \dfrac{k \, dq}{r^2} \cos \theta .

So, what's left to do is to prove that 0 1 + 4 x 2 ( 1 4 x 2 ) [ x 2 + ( 1 4 x 2 ) 2 ] 3 / 2 d x = 8 3 \displaystyle \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sqrt{1+4x^2} \left(\frac14 - x^2\right) }{ \left[ x^2 + \left(\frac14 - x^2\right)^2 \right] ^{3/2} } \, dx = \dfrac83 .

Note that we can simplify the denominator of the integrand to

[ x 2 + ( 1 4 x 2 ) 2 ] 3 / 2 = [ x 2 + x 4 + 1 16 1 2 x 2 ] 3 / 2 = [ x 4 + 1 16 + 1 2 x 2 ] 3 / 2 = [ ( x 2 + 1 4 ) 2 ] 3 / 2 = ( x 2 + 1 4 ) 3 \left[ x^2 + \left(\dfrac14 - x^2\right)^2 \right ] ^{3/2} = \left[x^2 + x^4 + \dfrac1{16} - \dfrac12 x^2 \right]^{3/2} = \left[ x^4 + \dfrac1{16} + \dfrac12 x^2 \right]^{3/2} = \left[ \left(x^2 + \dfrac14\right)^2 \right]^{3/2} = \left (x^2 + \dfrac14\right)^3

We start by making the trigonometric substitution x = 1 2 tan y x = \dfrac12\tan y , then d x d y = 1 2 sec 2 y \dfrac{dx}{dy} = \dfrac12 \sec^2 y ,

0 1 + 4 x 2 ( 1 4 x 2 ) [ x 2 + ( 1 4 x 2 ) 2 ] 3 / 2 d x = 0 1 + 4 x 2 ( 1 4 x 2 ) ( x 2 + 1 4 ) 3 d x = 0 π / 2 1 + tan 2 y 1 4 ( 1 tan 2 y ) ( 1 4 ) 3 ( 1 + tan 2 y ) 3 1 2 sec 2 y d y = 8 0 π / 2 sec y ( 1 tan 2 y ) ( sec 2 y ) 3 sec 2 y d y = 8 0 π / 2 1 tan 2 y sec 3 y d y = 8 0 π / 2 cos y ( 1 2 sin 2 y ) d y , let y = sin y d y = d z cos z = 8 0 1 ( 1 2 z 2 ) d z = 8 [ z 2 3 z 3 ] 0 1 = 8 3 . \begin{aligned} \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sqrt{1+4x^2} \left(\frac14 - x^2\right) }{ \left[ x^2 + \left(\frac14 - x^2\right)^2 \right] ^{3/2} } \, dx &=& \int_0^\infty \dfrac{\sqrt{1+4x^2} \left(\frac14 - x^2\right) }{ \left( x^2 + \frac14\right)^3 } \, dx \\ &=& \int_0^{\pi /2} \dfrac{\sqrt{1+\tan^2 y} \cdot \frac14 (1 - \tan^2 y)}{\left(\frac14\right)^3 (1+ \tan^2 y)^3 } \cdot \dfrac12 \sec^2 y \, dy \\ &=& 8 \int_0^{\pi /2} \dfrac{\sec y (1-\tan^2 y)}{(\sec^2 y)^3} \cdot \sec^2 y \, dy \\ &=& 8 \int_0^{\pi /2} \dfrac{1- \tan^2 y}{\sec^3 y } \, dy \\ &=& 8 \int_0^{\pi /2} \cos y (1 - 2\sin^2 y ) \, dy \qquad, \qquad \text{ let } y = \sin y \Rightarrow dy = \dfrac{dz}{\cos z} \\ &=& 8 \int_0^1 (1 - 2z^2) \, dz \\ &=& 8 \left [ z - \dfrac23 z^3 \right]_0^1 = \dfrac83 \; . \end{aligned}

And we're done!

Awesome Question And Awesome Solution :) (+1)

Aniket Sanghi - 4 years, 7 months ago

It would be better if we chose parametric coordinates to work with.The approach is exactly the same although the integrals here look nicer and simple substitution of t = t a n β t=tan\beta and integrating gives the result.But anyways your solution is nice!!

Spandan Senapati - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Sure, go ahead and post the parametric solution

Steven Chase - 4 years, 1 month ago

Awesome question

rakshith lokesh - 3 years, 1 month ago

@Steven Chase if you don't mind I think you have forgot to write 3 3 in the power in the denominator in the last 6th step.
By the way big peoples often make small mistakes.

Talulah Riley - 10 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

I only did the hand-written part. The Brilliant staff did the Latex

Steven Chase - 10 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase so now you didn't correct it???

Talulah Riley - 10 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley I have amended it

Steven Chase - 10 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Chase @Steven Chase if you don't mind I am surprised that I am 33rd Upvoter and it is obvious more than 33 people have seen this solution , so why did anyone not pointed out that mistake??

Talulah Riley - 10 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Evaluating the integral analytically is a tedious chore, so I'm not surprised that people ignored the details

Steven Chase - 10 months, 1 week ago
Nitin Marwah
May 24, 2017

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...