Following Gauss's Path

Level 2

It is said that, as a child, Gauss completed the tedious assignment of adding the first one hundred natural numbers in a few seconds by realizing that 1 + 100 = 2 + 99 = = 50 + 51 1+100=2+99=\ldots=50+51 , so the answer must be 50 × 101 50\times101 , since there are 50 such couples. The general case can be written as: k = 1 n k = n ( n + 1 ) 2 \sum_{k=1}^{n}k=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}

So, the sum of the first n n natural numbers is a 2nd-degree polynomial.

It can be shown that 1 p + 2 p + + n p = a 1 n + a 2 n 2 + + a p n p + a p + 1 n p + 1 1^p+2^p+\ldots+n^p=a_1\,n+a_2\,n^2+\ldots+a_p\,n^p+a_{p+1}\,n^{p+1} , a polynomial of degree p + 1 p+1 .

What is the value of a 1 + a 2 + + a p + 1 a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{p+1} ?

1 1 p + 1 p+1 p 1 p-1 0 0 p p

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Gabriel Chacón
Nov 16, 2018

Notice that when n = 1 n=1 , the sum k = 1 n k p \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{n}k^p has only one term: 1 p = 1 1^p=1 . So 1 1 should be the value the polynomial yields when we substitute n n for 1.

Therefore, a 1 + a 2 + + a p + 1 = 1 \boxed{a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_{p+1}=1} .

But does it work for n 1 n\ne1 as well?

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

That certainly is this problem's bonus. By substituting n n for 1 , 2 , 3 p 1,2,3\ldots p and ( p + 1 ) (p+1) , you can build a system of linear equations to determine the coefficients.

Gabriel Chacón - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

No, my point here is that you have only demonstrated that the sum is 1 for a finite number of n n 's. How do you know that it works for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , n=1,2,3,4,\ldots ?

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh I don't know. Can you illuminate me?

Gabriel Chacón - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Gabriel Chacón I think there is a typo in Pi Han Goh's last reply. I think he meant if it worked for n<>1, 2, 3, 4... I suppose he points to the intermediate (decimal) values of n.

Félix Pérez Haoñie - 2 years, 4 months ago

I tried the shortcut by thinking on the n(n+1)/2 = (n^2+n)/2 formula but only considered the numerator, so I got the sum to be 2 and the answer for the general case to be (probably) equal to p+1. I failed since I missed the denominator. (It doesn't mean I could otherwise have reached the right answer).

Félix Pérez Haoñie - 2 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...