Is 0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4 2 8 5 7 1 4 2 8 5 7 1 4 rational?
Note:
The notation
“
2
8
5
7
1
4
"
indicates that these digits in the decimal are being repeated. For example,
0
.
1
2
=
0
.
1
2
2
2
2
…
.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Good work. Up voted.
Log in to reply
Thanks for the compliment.
Log in to reply
I think for a level 1 problem , such an explanation is not required.
Log in to reply
@Rama Devi – But there is no harm in giving more explanation.
Log in to reply
@Nihar Mahajan – You could simply give the answer : )
Log in to reply
@Rama Devi – Dont be so mean we are the students of @Nihar Mahajan !!
This Type of explanation are superb !! I also try my best to give such explanation to others so people like me would get some benefit .
Cheers,
Be Generous !!
Log in to reply
@Syed Baqir – Excuse me , I am not a teacher , but a friend who likes to help others. I am just 14 and how could you say that you are a student of me? You are 5 years older than me and you are actually my teacher :)
Log in to reply
@Nihar Mahajan – Well, I am speaking philosophy :D
What I said heave insight meaning, even a friend or anyone older or younger teaches he should be respected as teacher from my point of view .
If you talk about age it will be different :)
@Nihar Mahajan – Keep it up Bhai, I also try my best to post solution so everyone would get benefit.
@Rama Devi – A level 1 student would need an explanation for the answer to a level 1 problem.
Well done.
Log in to reply
Then why don't you up vote?
Log in to reply
Why do u bother..
Log in to reply
@Venkata Nikhil – because its human tendency to up vote good work.If you are not a human, don't bother.
Very Well Explained
What will happen if we have :
XY . a 1 , a 2 , . . . . a n where X and Y are constants ?
Thank you my friend :D
Is 0.142857285714285714285714....... rational?
If it is rational number, let's check:
A = 0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 A = 2 8 5 7 1 4 . 2 8 5 7 1 4
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 A − A = 2 8 5 7 1 4
9 9 9 9 9 9 A = 2 8 5 7 1 4
9 9 9 9 9 9 2 8 5 7 1 4 = 7 2
You may want to fix the last line as 278514 is not correspond to the second to last one.
2/7 is rational dummy
This is simply 9 9 9 9 9 9 2 8 5 7 1 4 which implies it is rational.
If a number has finite recurring decimals, it is rational.
0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4 = 0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4 2 8 5 7 1 4 . . . . . . .
A number IS a rational number if it repeats a sequence of finite digits over and over.
∴ 0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4 ∈ Q
That is true. An irrational number will be 0.285714285714428571444...
How you know it is repeat itself ? because in the question we have a part of it ?
Log in to reply
Mehul Arora is pointing out that the line above the number indicates that it repeats. It's the method of expressing that information.
1/7=0.142857142857... 2/7=0.285714285714... 3/7=0.428571428571... 也就是说以7为分母的分数的循环结构由1、4、2、8、5、7构成 It's interesting.
All repeating decimals are all rational numbers.
0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4 2 8 5 7 1 4 ⋯ = 0 . 2 ˙ 8 5 7 1 4 ˙ = 9 9 9 9 9 9 2 8 5 7 1 4 = 7 × 1 4 2 8 5 7 2 × 1 4 2 8 5 7 = 7 × 1 4 2 8 5 7 1 2 × 1 4 2 8 5 7 1 = 7 2 .
If a decimal repeats, it is rational.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Lets generalize this.Consider a decimal 0 . a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n .Now lets prove that this is rational.So let
A = 0 . a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n … ( 1 )
If we multiply A by 1 0 n , the decimal point gets shifted to left by n places which gives us :
1 0 n × A = a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n . a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n … ( 2 )
Now lets subtract 1 from 2 because that will make the right side of decimal as 0 . Thus we get:
1 0 n A − A = a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n ⇒ A ( 1 0 n − 1 ) = a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n ⇒ A = 1 0 n − 1 a 1 a 2 a 3 … a n
Since A can be clearly seen to be equal to q p for p , q ∈ Z and q = 0 , we conclude that A is rational.
In this problem a 1 = 2 , a 2 = 8 , a 3 = 5 , a 4 = 7 , a 5 = 1 , a 6 = 4 and by our generalization we have 0 . 2 8 5 7 1 4 as rational number :)