2 1 + 4 1 + 8 1 + 1 6 1 + 3 2 1 + 6 4 1 + 1 2 8 1 + 2 5 6 1 + x 1 = 1
Find the value of x satisfying the above equation.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Solution to bonus question:
2 1 + 2 2 1 + … + 2 n 1 + 2 n 1 = 1
Log in to reply
What is the question?
Log in to reply
It's in the solution
Bonus question: Can you generalized this pattern?
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – Ahh, sorry! I thought you're asking a bonus question. Never mind.
Great problem and solution! Thanks :)
Nice calculation. Extreamily.
Not really
Yeah may be ..but we have to see it
Relevant wiki: Geometric Progression Sum
We are given that ( 2 1 + 4 1 + 8 1 + 1 6 1 + 3 2 1 + 6 4 1 + 1 2 8 1 + 2 5 6 1 ) + x 1 = 1 .
Now using the formula for the sum of a geometric progression in the LHS of the equation, we get
⎝ ⎛ 1 − 2 1 2 1 [ 1 − ( 2 1 ) 8 ] ⎠ ⎞ + x 1 = 1
⇒ ( 1 − ( 2 1 ) 8 ) + x 1 = 1
⇒ x 1 = 2 8 1
∴ x = 2 5 6
Nice work ............
Great solution, thanks!
You can further improve this by putting "Note:..." after the first line of your solution that will make the solution moving in a peaceful rhythm. ;)
Log in to reply
Done.... :)
Log in to reply
Great! Adding some text to the solutions(problems) to connect the different statements makes them better.
I've modified your solution a little bit. I hope you would like it. Thanks :)
I DID IT EXACTLY IN THE SAME WAY!
I solved in the same way.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Note that we can calculate it with usual process(by using sum of n terms of Geometric progression) but I like to provide pattern used here.
2 1 + 2 1 = 1
2 1 + 4 1 + 4 1 = 1
2 1 + 4 1 + 8 1 + 8 1 = 1
2 1 + 4 1 + 8 1 + 1 6 1 + 1 6 1 = 1
2 1 + 4 1 + 8 1 + 1 6 1 + 3 2 1 + 3 2 1 = 1
. . . So on
2 1 + 4 1 + 8 1 + 1 6 1 + 3 2 1 + 6 4 1 + 1 2 8 1 + 2 5 6 1 + 2 5 6 1 = 1
Bonus question: Can you generalized this pattern?