Free points!
The answer to this question is 1. Have fun! :)
The answer is 1.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
2 solutions
Hence proven
Log in to reply
coughing with bursts of laughter intensifies
welp, i dont wanna be the one to report this beauty (sans here)
Log in to reply
i assume/hope i finally understand how to get that mention id.
when a name is used in a note where this person was already mentioned, then this person appears in the selection list.
when the name is repeated in the same post, then it will be replaced by the mention id when posted. is that correct?
so to get an id a post has to be done, the id will not be visible before the post-button is pressed. correct?
Log in to reply
@Num Ic – Yes, you are right. I think I mentioned that in my post
Log in to reply
@Frisk Dreemurr
–
hm, somehow ...
i had to watch that gif several times to identify the key-points.
some weeks ago i found some mention id, but they appeared after a post was deleted. so i assumed that was the refered method.
sometimes when i typed a name it was replaced by the mention id without pressing "post", but i could not identify the conditions for that.
(what is a pitty bcs i tried to avoid spamming posts.)
but now i tried to address krishna and tried your method.
i tried to type "no instance of ..." then i just used @"his name" or
just typed the name and pressed "post" ...
it took me a while to find out that the key point is to repeat the name and(!) to press "post" to get the mention id.
sry, i could not reply on the "flatearther" post, since the comments were deleted.
ty for the insight on India and Australia. now i regret even more that i have never been to Australia.
it seems that Australia (the whole coutry) has less than 50 new infections per day - some cities in Germany have already more :(
btw nice pic of the unified theory ;-)
Log in to reply
I had literally no idea that it was the unified theory until Steven Chase told me 🤣🤣🤣 I just looked up complicated maths and physics lmao
@Krishna Karthik i try to get the mention id
Log in to reply
@Krishna Karthik , mention[6497226:Krishna Karthik]
Log in to reply
@Num Ic – Ah, here I am!
@Num Ic – You got the mention ID. I wonder, can I mention myself? @Krishna Karthik
@Num Ic – @num IC btw I just mentioned myself and got a notification 🤣
Who would have thought that the Lagrangian of the Standard Model would reduce so nicely?
Log in to reply
Yes; this is proof of unity, and therefore the existence of god (jokes; I'm agnostic)
Log in to reply
the real proof of god was done in the hitchhikers guide ;-)
The answer is one
Now people can boast that they just solved a hard level classical mechanics problem :)
lmao @Krishna Karthik I was binging your problems to get inspiration for a new problem, and this is what i found. Its really inspiring tbh :P
Log in to reply
@Percy Jackson Haha, this is perhaps my opus magnum; my masterpiece problem.
Log in to reply
The solution is very elegant as well. I was holding it in, until I read 'QED bitch!'...then I fell to the floor laughing :P
Lmfaoo, godamnit
Read the first question we have to do, then you have to complete the world's hardest math test to do this, otherwise you will find the wrong answer.after writing 1 in the answer part and you will find the laws of the whole universe
Therefore:
It is easy to see from the trivial exercise above that:
Therefore 1