If
1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + x 3 7 + x 4 9 + … = 9 1 ,
then evaluate
1 + x 4 + x 2 9 + x 3 1 6 + x 4 2 5 + …
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I was not able to get factors of that quadratic eq. Is their any easy way to find the factors.
Log in to reply
There is a sure way of perfect square method for quadratic roots. For a x 2 + b x + c = 0 , then we have x = 2 a − b ± b 2 − 4 a c . For rational roots b 2 − 4 a c is perfect square of a rational number. Using this example: x = 2 ( 9 0 ) 1 8 3 ± 1 8 3 2 − 4 ( 9 0 ( 9 1 ) = 1 8 0 1 8 3 ± 7 2 9 = 1 8 0 1 8 3 ± 2 7 = { 1 8 0 2 1 0 = 6 7 1 8 0 1 5 6 = 1 5 1 3
⇒ ( 6 x − 7 ) ( 1 5 x − 1 3 ) = 0
It is not easy to factor; however, if you suspect that the solutions are rational, consider that 9 1 = 1 ⋅ 9 1 = 7 ⋅ 1 3 are the only possible factorizations of the constant term. Thus we write ( a x − 7 ) ( b x − 1 3 ) = a b x 2 − ( 1 3 a + 7 b ) x + 9 1 . Next, consider that 1 3 a + 7 b = 1 8 3 implies that a ≤ 1 4 and b ≤ 2 6 . This limit the factorizations for a ⋅ b = 9 0 to 9 0 = 5 ⋅ 1 8 , 6 ⋅ 1 5 , 9 ⋅ 1 0 , 1 0 ⋅ 9 . We readily see that the second option is correct, so ( 6 x − 7 ) ( 1 5 x − 1 3 ) = 9 0 x 2 − 1 8 3 x + 9 1 .
Log in to reply
I didn't understand how it limits the factorizations for a.b=90
Log in to reply
@Praful Jain – Because a and b are both positive, and 13a + 7b < 183, we can rule out situations such as a = 45, b = 2.
A small error: the two terms in the arithmetic geometric progression formula need to be added not subtracted.
Log in to reply
Thanks, I have amended it.
Log in to reply
Haha thank you for posting the solution and linking the wiki so I could learn about this series.
Did the same way!
Let
S = 1 + x 4 + x 2 9 + x 3 1 6 + x 4 2 5 + ⋯ ⇒ ( 1 )
Multiplying with x 1 in equation ( 1 )
x 1 S = x 1 + x 2 4 + x 3 9 + x 4 1 6 + x 5 2 5 + ⋯ ⇒ ( 2 )
Subtracting equation ( 1 ) with equation ( 2 )
( 1 − x 1 ) S = ( x x − 1 ) S = ( x x − 1 ) S = S = 1 + x 4 − 1 + x 2 9 − 4 + x 3 1 6 − 9 + x 4 2 5 − 1 6 + ⋯ 1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + x 3 7 + x 4 9 + ⋯ 9 1 x − 1 9 1 x ⇒ ( 3 )
From Equation,
1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + x 3 7 + x 4 9 + ⋯ = 9 1 ⇒ ( 4 )
Multiplying with x 1 in equation ( 4 )
x 1 + x 2 3 + x 3 5 + x 4 7 + x 5 9 + ⋯ = x 9 1 ⇒ ( 5 )
Subtracting equation ( 4 ) with equation ( 5 )
1 + x 3 − 1 + x 2 5 − 3 + x 3 7 − 5 + x 4 9 − 7 + ⋯ = x 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 + x 4 2 + ⋯ = x 2 2 + x 3 2 + x 4 2 + ⋯ = 1 − x 1 x 2 2 = x 2 2 = x 2 2 = 2 = 9 0 x 2 − 1 8 3 x + 9 1 = ( 1 5 x − 1 3 ) ( 6 x − 7 ) = x = 9 1 − x 9 1 9 0 − x 9 1 9 0 − x 9 3 x 9 0 x − 9 3 , ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ < 1 ( x 9 0 x − 9 3 ) ( x x − 1 ) x 2 9 0 x 2 − 1 8 3 x + 9 3 9 0 x 2 − 1 8 3 x + 9 3 , x = 0 0 0 1 5 1 3 , 6 7
But ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ < 1 Thus, x = 6 7
Instead x with 6 7 in equation ( 3 ) that is,
S = 6 7 − 1 9 1 ( 6 7 ) = 6 1 6 6 3 7 = 6 3 7
Ditto same solution. Not even a step different.
Log in to reply
Same here...i also solve it by same sequnce if steps..
I used calculus!
First, let z = x 1 . Then 1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + ⋯ = 1 + 3 z 2 + 5 z 4 + ⋯ = d z d ( z + z 3 + z 5 + ⋯ ) = d z d ( z ⋅ ( 1 + z 2 + z 4 + ⋯ ) ) = d z d 1 − z 2 z = ( 1 − z 2 ) 2 1 + z 2 = ( x − 1 ) 2 x 2 + x . This is equal to 91. Solving for x , x 2 + x = 9 1 ( x − 1 ) 2 ∴ x = 6 7 ∨ x = 1 5 1 3 , but the latter solution we reject because that would cause a divergent series.
Now let u = 1 / x . Then 1 + x 4 + x 2 9 + ⋯ = 1 + 4 u + 9 u 2 + ⋯ = d u d ( u + 2 u 2 + 3 u 3 + ⋯ ) = d u d ( u ⋅ ( 1 + 2 u + 3 u 2 + ⋯ ) ) = d u d ( u d u d ( u + u 2 + u 3 + ⋯ ) ) = d u d ( u d u d 1 − u u ) = d u d ( u ( 1 − u ) 2 1 ) = d u d ( 1 − u ) 2 u = ( 1 − u ) 3 1 + u = ( x − 1 ) 3 x 3 + x 2 = x − 1 x ⋅ ( x − 1 ) 2 x 2 + x = 7 / 6 − 1 7 / 6 ⋅ 9 1 = 7 − 6 7 ⋅ 9 1 = 6 3 7 .
Beautiful. I'm partial to calculus, so this solution makes me happy.
Could you please explain the 3rd step where you transform d/dz(z(1+z^2+z^4+...)) into the closed-form expression d/dz(z/(1-z^2) ? Thanks!
Log in to reply
Sure. In general, 1 + α + α 2 + ⋯ = 1 − α 1 . Substitute α = z 2 .
A lovely solution indeed
Observing that
1
=
1
4
=
1
+
3
9
=
1
+
3
+
5
...
I expressed
1
+
x
4
+
x
2
9
+
.
.
.
=
(
1
+
x
3
+
x
2
5
+
.
.
.
)
(
1
+
x
1
+
x
2
1
+
.
.
.
)
=
(
9
1
)
(
1
−
x
1
1
)
=
x
−
1
9
1
x
My approach to find
x
is the same as Ikkyu San's one.
Define f ( y ) = i = 0 ∑ ∞ y i = 1 / ( 1 − x ) Then, by differentiating the two equivalent expressions, we get f ′ ( y ) = i = 0 ∑ ∞ ( i + 1 ) y i = f ( y ) 2 f ′ ′ ( y ) = i = 0 ∑ ∞ ( i + 1 ) ( i + 2 ) y i = 2 f ( y ) 3
Let z = f ( 1 / x ) , then we know that 2 z 2 − z − 9 1 = 0 z = 7 o r − 6 . 5 z is clearly positive, so we accept the value z = 7 . We want to calculate
i = 0 ∑ ∞ ( i + 1 ) 2 x − i = 2 z 3 − z 2 = z ( 2 z 2 − z ) = 9 1 z = 6 3 7
Sorry for the formatting, I can't figure out how to get a LaTeX \align to work.
Its not a solution !!
Log in to reply
Exactly it's just the answer
Log in to reply
You may gain a short cut by thinking from reading an answer like this as a solution particularly to this question.
You know the solution. To me, yes. Just a clue is more than adequate. A sort of solution able to let people to think by themselves.
1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + . . . = 9 1 Subtract 1 and multiply by x on both sides
3 + x 5 + x 2 7 + . . . = 9 0 x Subtract the first line from the second
2 ( 1 + x 1 + x 2 1 + . . . ) = 9 0 x − 9 1 This converges as ∣ x ∣ > 1 . Assume that is the case and multiply by x − 1
2 x = ( 9 0 x − 9 1 ) ( x − 1 )
0 = 9 0 x 2 − 1 8 3 x + 9 1
x = ( 1 8 3 ± 2 7 ) / 1 8 0
x = 6 7 ∨ x = 1 5 1 3 The latter value for x is not a valid solution, because we assumed ∣ x ∣ > 1 .
Let's dub the expression to evaluate t :
t = 1 + x 4 + x 2 1 6 + . . .
x t = x 1 + x 2 4 + x 3 1 6 + . . . Subtract from the line above
t ( 1 − x 1 ) = 1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + . . . = 9 1
t = 1 − 7 6 9 1 = 9 1 × 7 = 6 3 7
We set y = x 1 . So 1 + 3 y + 5 y 2 + 7 y 3 + 9 y 4 + ⋯ = 9 1 ⇔ n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n − 1 ) y n − 1 = 9 1 . Using derivative, we obtain n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n − 1 ) y n − 1 = 2 n = 1 ∑ ∞ n y n − 1 − n = 1 ∑ ∞ y n − 1 = 2 n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( y n ) ′ − n = 1 ∑ ∞ y n − 1 = 2 ( n = 1 ∑ ∞ y n ) ′ − 1 − y 1 = ( 1 − y ) 2 2 − 1 − y 1 , i.e. ( 1 − y ) 2 1 + y = 9 1 ⇒ y = 7 6 ∨ y = 1 3 1 5 . However, we reject 1 3 1 5 , because there must be ∣ y ∣ < 1 for the series to converge. Further we have 1 + 4 y + 9 y 2 + 1 6 y 3 + 2 5 y 4 + ⋯ = 1 + ( 1 + 3 ) y + ( 4 + 5 ) y 2 + ( 7 + 9 ) y 3 + ( 9 + 1 6 ) y 4 + ( 1 1 + 2 5 ) y 5 + ⋯ . There follows a = 1 + 4 y + 9 y 2 + 1 6 y 3 + 2 5 y 4 + ⋯ = ( 1 + 3 y + 5 y 2 + 7 y 3 + 9 y 4 + 1 1 y 5 ⋯ ) + ( y + 4 y 2 + 9 y 3 + 1 6 y 4 + 2 5 y 5 + ⋯ ) In view of the previous result, and replacing y = 7 6 , we find a = 9 1 + y ⋅ a ⇔ a = 1 − y 9 1 ⇒ a = 6 3 7 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let the first infinite sum be S 1 , therefore,
S 1 = 1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + x 3 7 + x 4 9 + . . . = n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 1 + 2 n ) ( x 1 ) n
We note that S 1 is an AGP (arithmetic-geometric progression) with first term a = 1 , common difference d = 2 and common ratio r = x 1 and its sum is S ∞ = 1 − r a + ( 1 − r ) 2 d r (see wiki ). Therefore, we have:
1 − x 1 1 + ( 1 − x 1 ) 2 ( x 1 ) x − 1 x + ( x − 1 ) 2 2 x x 2 − 2 x + 1 x ( x − 1 ) + 2 x 9 0 x 2 − 1 8 3 x + 9 1 ( 1 5 x − 1 3 ) ( 6 x − 7 ) ⇒ x = 9 1 = 9 1 = 9 1 = 0 = 0 = { 1 5 1 3 6 7 < 1 rejected; for S 1 to converge x > 1 . > 1 accepted.
Let the second infinite sum be S 2 , then we have:
S 2 ⇒ S 2 S 2 = 1 + x 4 + x 2 9 + x 3 1 6 + x 4 2 5 + . . . = 1 + x 3 + x 1 + x 2 5 + x 2 4 + x 3 7 + x 3 9 + x 4 9 + x 4 1 6 + . . . = 1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + x 3 7 + x 4 9 + . . . x 1 + x 2 4 + x 3 9 + x 4 1 6 + . . . = 1 + x 3 + x 2 5 + x 3 7 + x 4 9 + . . . + x 1 ( 1 + x 4 + x 2 9 + x 3 1 6 + . . . ) = S 1 + x 1 S 2 = S 1 + 7 6 S 2 = 7 S 1 = 6 3 7